One of Us
| 13 1/2" is not a bad LOP.....maybe it'll work for you.
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// "Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." Winston Churchill
|
| Posts: 28849 | Location: western Nebraska | Registered: 27 May 2003 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| I shoot 14" with a "T" shirt but 13-1/2" with hunting clothes on. It is easier to shoot a shorter LOP then one too long. |
| Posts: 4068 | Location: Bakerton, WV | Registered: 01 September 2003 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| I would use a leather covered pad. I like th elength of 14.25, but my favorite pads for covering (on my rifles or if the customer elaves it up to me) is the .8" Pachmayer Decelrator covered in black pig skin. The .8" looks better to my eye when covered. The leather adds to the length of th epad, as the thickness goes over the front and rear of the pad. So when you add double the thickness of the leather to the .8" pad, it looks right to me. I think this would be the best way to class the rifle up to its former standard |
| Posts: 2509 | Location: Kisatchie National Forest, LA | Registered: 20 October 2004 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| I am 6'3" with a sleeve length of 37" and LOP ona rifle isn't that big of a deal for me, within reason that is. A lot of scopes can't be set back enough or have enough relief to work well with a stock long enough to fully fit me. Now when I buy a shotgun that is a totally different matter! It must fit or I am a worse shot than normal.
Dennis Life member NRA
|
| Posts: 1191 | Location: Ft. Morgan, CO | Registered: 15 April 2005 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| I think most of my stocks are around 13.75 or just over, and I need to cut them all down when I get time. I am going to go to 13.5. with that being 14.25 over the pad, assuming 1" pad you would be a bit short for a skeleton buttplate, HOWEVER, I wouldn't shoot one with a plate anyways. why abuse yourself. get a good leather covered pad and you're good to go. I think it runs about 150 to install a leather covered pad.
Red |
| Posts: 4742 | Location: Fresno, CA | Registered: 21 March 2003 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| I know you didn't offer this as an alternative, but I really like the London Guns red pad, or the Griffin and Howe.
In fact, the only thing I could ever afford from Griffin and Howe is the pad.
It's virtually indistinguishable from the London Guns, and cheaper.
flaco |
| |
One of Us
| Awe come on Pre-War, who was the maker and lets see a photo of the gun. |
| |
one of us
| A properly built stock originally shaped w/ a 14" LOP is going to look funny when cut to 13.25" or less. The critical first step is determining your correct LOP. After you make this determination, I'd suggest sending the rifle back to the original maker and tell him your LOP. He can add a leather-covered pad with the correct thickness that will fit you or he may cut a little more off the stock and add a leather-covered pad that will fit you.
______________________________ "Truth is the daughter of time." Francis Bacon
|
| Posts: 5053 | Location: Muletown | Registered: 07 September 2001 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| Forrest, you have got it right--first determine the correct length of pull, then, if you can appropriately put on a butt plate put it on. If not, put on a leather pad. I would probably use goat skin. Although it scuffs easier than pig skin, I think it has a more refined look. One thing, I think I disagree on is the relationship of the lop and the overall length of the gun. In a perfect world, the overall length of gun and pull would be related, but what happens when a short armed person wants a 26" or even 24" barrel? |
| |
one of us
| You are almost certainly stuck with a pad now. When the fellow cut the stock down it changed all of the outside dimensions and a new plate will be quite a bit oversized. Forrest has it right. The stock won't look right with an inch off of it. Get the pad redone by the original maker.
Roger Kehr Kehr Engraving Company (360)456-0831
|
| Posts: 1634 | Location: Washington State | Registered: 29 December 2002 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| Here is a photo of an outstanding job on one by none other than Customstox. |
| |
one of us
| quote: Originally posted by Prewar70: What's a quick and easy way to estimate proper LOP? Keep in mind I am at the office and am armed with a 24" ruler only. I'd like to get an estimate at least.
A ruler won't tell you your proper LOP. Find someone with a try-stock if you can. If that's not available, try several rifles with different LOPs or use a slip-on pad on a few rifles and see what you come up with. Most factory stocks are right around 13-5/8". Most guys make-do with that and get acclimated to that LOP. It can be liberating to try a shorter or longer LOP for many people. You might be one of them. I like a 14 or 14-1/4" LOP and now factory stocks seem like they were built for midgets. Everyone is different and 1/4" can be a lot.
______________________________ "Truth is the daughter of time." Francis Bacon
|
| Posts: 5053 | Location: Muletown | Registered: 07 September 2001 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| quote: Originally posted by Prewar70: Thanks Bill, but I need a good recommendation for a gunsmith that will do a top notch quality job on a leather pad as the original maker is not available.
I don't know if he has time right now but Bill Soverns will do a fine job. Aut vincere aut mori |
| Posts: 4869 | Location: Lakewood, CO | Registered: 07 February 2002 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| Jack O'Connor once stated that, according to Tom Shelhamer, that combination looked like a man wearing a tuxedo and rubber boots. Doesn't bother me though. Thanks...Bill. |
| Posts: 188 | Location: West Virginia | Registered: 14 March 2006 |
IP
|
|