The Accurate Reloading Forums
Which do you like?
16 April 2009, 10:12
Michael PetrovWhich do you like?
No reason needed, just let me know the one that looks the best to you. Thanks.
16 April 2009, 10:15
22WRFC, although I might be tempted to tone down the real bright highlights just a bit with photoshop.
(Edit: Background in A looks muddy and the gun is too flat. Same in B. gun is too flat but better than A (look at difference in checkering detail) C shows good detail in the sight but highlights too bright. Metalwork in C has good contrast and detail.)
16 April 2009, 11:27
maxbearA
16 April 2009, 11:41
GatogordoI'll make it unanimous.....B.....

which really is my preference.
xxxxxxxxxx
When considering US based operations of guides/outfitters, check and see if they are NRA members. If not, why support someone who doesn't support us? Consider spending your money elsewhere.
NEVER, EVER book a hunt with BLAIR WORLDWIDE HUNTING or JEFF BLAIR.
I have come to understand that in hunting, the goal is not the goal but the process.
16 April 2009, 11:45
RG RhodesNumber two.
RG
16 April 2009, 12:05
Dr. LouB
****************
NRA Life Benefactor Member
16 April 2009, 12:14
ShopCartRacingA
16 April 2009, 12:30
IdaredI actually like
A the best.
Is this a test for your new book?
******************************
"We do not exaggerate when we state positively that the remodelled Springfield is the best and most suitable "all 'round" rifle".......Seymour Griffin, GRIFFIN & HOWE, Inc.
16 April 2009, 12:43
LuckyduckerDoor #3
Dennis
Life member NRA
16 April 2009, 13:18
Steve LathamB for me!

16 April 2009, 15:56
darwinmauserI would go with A Michael , B looks like there is to much reflection from the bottom metal and C looks chrome plated. whats your favored image??
It's mercy, compassion and forgiveness I lack; not rationality.
16 April 2009, 16:03
peterdki would like somewhere between B and C, if that is not possible then B
best regards
peter
Put me down for
A. It's easier on the eye's.
Terry
--------------------------------------------
Well, other than that Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?
16 April 2009, 17:17
Oz3006No contest. It has to be A.
I like
A Maybe do a
C with white back ground
16 April 2009, 18:01
bpesteveA
A black background seems "unnatural" to me and I have a more difficult time determining just what colors the wood really shows. Dark backgrounds also make the glare problem stand out more.
Yummy wood in that one!
16 April 2009, 18:33
nosualcGo with a light background. Much more forgiving of mask inaccuracy. I find that edge distracting. Sample C seems unnaturally saturated.
Forgive me for taking a small liberty. I took 'A' and added a little fill flash.
-nosualc
Beware the fury of an aroused democracy. -Ike
16 April 2009, 18:47
clowdisBest looking wood in A & B but I can see more detail in C. So I reckon it would depend on what I was after in a photograph and which depicts the truest colors.
"Peace is that brief glorious moment in history when everybody stands around reloading".
16 April 2009, 18:54
AllenBoselyA
Allen
It's a Mauser thing, you wouldn't understand.
16 April 2009, 18:56
darwinmauserquote:
Originally posted by nosualc:
Go with a light background. Much more forgiving of mask inaccuracy. I find that edge distracting. Sample C seems unnaturally saturated.
Forgive me for taking a small liberty. I took 'A' and added a little fill flash.
-nosualc

It's mercy, compassion and forgiveness I lack; not rationality.
16 April 2009, 19:15
craigsterA.
16 April 2009, 19:25
DuggaBoyequote:
Originally posted by peterdk:
i would like somewhere between B and C, if that is not possible then B
best regards
peter
+1
or dawrinmauser's flash fill.
DuggaBoye-O
NRA-Life
Whittington-Life
TSRA-Life
DRSS
DSC
HSC
SCI
16 April 2009, 19:49
zimbabweA --- seems more detailed,crisper if you could actually use that to describe a photograph.
SCI Life Member
NRA Patron Life Member
DRSS
16 April 2009, 20:26
fla3006A, better constrast against the light background, detail shows up better.
NRA Life Member, Band of Bubbas Charter Member, PGCA, DRSS.
Shoot & hunt with vintage classics.
16 April 2009, 20:36
new_guyA looks the best.
B and C look a little out of place because of the white light bouncing off of the edges of the rifle.
Some black cards placed around the edge of the rifle while photographing it would correct that.
With less white relfecting on the edges, the rifle would blend with the black background better.
16 April 2009, 21:01
Ian (VA)I like "A" the best.
16 April 2009, 22:21
loud-n-boomerC for seeing the details.
A for pure aesthetics.
One morning I shot an elephant in my pajamas. How he got into my pajamas I'll never know. - Groucho Marx
17 April 2009, 00:32
Bent FossdalA, absoulutely.
Bent Fossdal
Reiso
5685 Uggdal
Norway
17 April 2009, 01:38
Doc224/375I prefer this one ; Doctor photo special !.
17 April 2009, 01:48
srtraxI think A with a black background would be interesting? Of the three I would have to say A.
_____________________
Steve Traxson
17 April 2009, 02:05
Dago Redb and c both look unnatural, very flat at the edges. the highlight looks weird. I think this is because you are tkaing you picture then manipulating the background. I'd go A or better take the picture with a different background.
IMO photoshopping is for when you have to improvise or make due, if you can change your setup to begin with I think you are better off. I always really liked scrollcutter's pics that had the french blue cloth background.
Red
My rule of life prescribed as an absolutely sacred rite smoking cigars and also the drinking of alcohol before, after and if need be during all meals and in the intervals between them.
-Winston Churchill
17 April 2009, 03:12
Frank MartinezI like A but I (and I hope it is just my eyes) think they are all three a touch soft in focus.
I like a sharper focus with longer depth of field.
Frank
17 April 2009, 03:22
richjI like A
17 April 2009, 04:42
HarrisB
The price of knowledge is great but the price of ignorance is even greater.
17 April 2009, 05:33
D HumbargerB makes that springfield pop! (stand out)
Doug Humbarger
NRA Life member
Tonkin Gulf Yacht Club 72'73.
Yankee Station
Try to look unimportant. Your enemy might be low on ammo.
17 April 2009, 06:01
Sendero300B
Sendero300>>>===TerryP
17 April 2009, 06:30
Michael RobinsonI would say B. But if you could get rid of the light reflecting off the underside of the rifle it would be better.
Maybe a long, aperture-controlled exposure in natural light?
Mike
Wilderness is my cathedral, and hunting is my prayer.
17 April 2009, 06:43
ted thornThey all look the same to me....the only dif. I see is background color.
________________________________________________
Maker of The Frankenstud Sling Keeper
Proudly made in the USA
Acepting all forms of payment
17 April 2009, 08:03
GeoffM24D) Take the photo again with an actual black background.
17 April 2009, 08:48
SR4759I don't like any of them.
I would prefer the dark back ground if the rifle was properly lit.