THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM GUNSMITHING FORUM


Moderators: jeffeosso
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Barrel length question?
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
Picture of Wookie316
posted
I know longer barrels add to your FPS.

My question is 2 parts.

1. How many FPS per inch do you loose on average?

2. How does barrel length affect max load pressure? Does a longer barrel with the same load have higher pressure or is it affected?


______________________
Did I mention I love Sako's

 
Posts: 138 | Location: Border City (On the poor side)}:-( | Registered: 16 May 2009Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
1. Hard to pin that down to a rule of thumb. And to get technical I'd say it depends on the expansion ration of a particular cartridge. For example a cartridge with a low expansion ratio like a 7mm STW stands to lose more velocity from a two inch barrel reduction than a something like a .458 Lott where two inches probably won't amount to much reduction in velocity. But if you want a number I can randomly say you'll lose an average of 30 fps per inch of barrel reduction.. stir


2. No
 
Posts: 1250 | Location: Golden, CO | Registered: 05 April 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of kcstott
posted Hide Post
I've found 10 to 20 FPS to be about right per inch of barrel but 30 FPS is not unlikely.

Barrel length and all else being equal will have zero effect on the peak pressure a cartridge generates. you will how ever have a longer pressure curve though


www.KLStottlemyer.com

Deport the Homeless and Give the Illegals citizenship. AT LEAST THE ILLEGALS WILL WORK
 
Posts: 2534 | Location: National City CA | Registered: 15 December 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Wookie316
posted Hide Post
Dad's 7mm is 24 1/2" long & my 264 Win Mag is just over 26". You wouldn't think the extra 1 1/2 would be much of an issue in the field, but I find it somewhat clumsy & awkward compared to Dad's 7mm, especially going through light bush.

1 1/2" shorter on a 264 Win Mag shouldn't make much difference?


______________________
Did I mention I love Sako's

 
Posts: 138 | Location: Border City (On the poor side)}:-( | Registered: 16 May 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of kcstott
posted Hide Post
I doubt it's the barrel. but that could be a balance issue. The fit of the stock is more likely the cause of the one rifle feeling clumsy compared to the other.
Stock fit to the shooter is something that is quite often over looked. and in this day and age of off the shelf one size fits all rifles. The stocks are built to fit about 75% of the general population but may not fit you.
Then there's balance. if the rifle is weight forward it will feel big and clumsy and slow to shoulder but if it's balanced correctly it will feel like it has a magnet in the but and your shoulder is a steel plate. it will just naturally point well. I bet you if you laid the rifles side by side and checked the drop at the heal, comb, and length of pull you will find some difference and they may only be a 1/2" or so but that is enough to feel wrong or right.

I have a single shot rifle that just points perfect but my wing master 870 shot gun feels like it has a lead weight attached to the end of the barrel. Those to are balanced differently And I need to correct the wingmaster.


www.KLStottlemyer.com

Deport the Homeless and Give the Illegals citizenship. AT LEAST THE ILLEGALS WILL WORK
 
Posts: 2534 | Location: National City CA | Registered: 15 December 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Wookie316
posted Hide Post
I think you mis-understood me. The rifle fits me fine, no issues in that respect.

I am referring to maneuverability you gain with less inches. The shorter barrel is nicer for simple stupid things. Getting in & out of the truck without jamming the barrel somewhere. Walks through light bush & not getting hung up. I use a boonie packer sling & that extra length on the barrel although be it small sometimes can be a pain.

Being the FPS is minor in a shorter barrel, I'm considering knocking an 1 1/2 off of it, but that is not written in stone.

Here is the 264.



Here is the 7mm



______________________
Did I mention I love Sako's

 
Posts: 138 | Location: Border City (On the poor side)}:-( | Registered: 16 May 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
26 inch barrels are definitely a pain in the woods(another place as well LOL). It is unreal how many more things you bang, clunk, and get tangled in! I'll take a 21.5" or 22" 30-06 anyday over a 26" 300 H&H in the woods! 24" guns aren't too bad.


PA Bear Hunter, NRA Benefactor
 
Posts: 1632 | Location: Potter County, Pennsylvania | Registered: 22 June 2005Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia