It has been beat up here a bit; check some of the past posts. I have done several refinish/clean-ups and have settled on the Dorian (sp?) carbide tools; they seem to last forever. I like the 'pull' tool for cleaning up old checkering along with a 'see thru' handle (Brownells). One problem I haven't solved adequately is getting into the really tight places where the lines are very short. Maybe some of the heavy hitters that haunt this site could give us some help here? C.G.B.
Posts: 238 | Location: Colorado | Registered: 05 June 2001
Yes. If it is sharp the grain direction is not a big factor. Getting it to run stright is tougher. Be aware of the direction you push it and how deep you are going.
Posts: 813 | Location: Left Coast | Registered: 02 November 2000
I agree that you have shown a very nice looking piece of work (and I would go so far as to state that I would not be qualifed to comment on how good it is because I don't checker)
But what I wanted to ask about from an aesthetic point of view (because I know you built the stock) is why (and I am not saying it is right or wrong or anything for that matter) you leave that Winchester rear tang in its full configureation (if that is a word). I have seen them where the rear tang is reshaped with some of that metal removed. What is your view on that?
Blue, This is my third rifle that I've restocked (I've checkered a dozen or so). I've been trying to do one or two new things per rifles as I learn to make custom stocks. Reshaped tangs are something that I may try in the future......DJ
Posts: 3976 | Location: Oklahoma,USA | Registered: 27 February 2004
dj, Rest assured, you did a great job on that stock. Can't see what the one gentleman said since **** You are ignoring this user **** keeps popping up for his posts. I like your finish, your checkering, the shape of the stock. Great job
Posts: 4917 | Location: Wenatchee, WA, USA | Registered: 17 December 2001
[/url]
