06 March 2006, 22:23
woodsracerHELP, is there a width diff. in the M1913 accessory rail and the Weaver/Picatinny?
I know that Weaver/Picatinny/AR-15 rings will fit on my CZ550 Safari Mag in .416 Rigby, because I have experimented with them.
What I am wondering is if
Barrett's Adjustable Scope Rings that are designed to fit the M1913 rail, would also fit on the CZ action?????
IF SO, THEN, I could adjust them for longer range shooting!!!
Since the
Barrett .416 is being released, and I already have Rigby dies, and with 400 grain LR bullets with a .943 BC being available soon; I am thinking about building a Quick Twist .416 Rigby on my CZ to play with!!!
07 March 2006, 21:09
woodsracer*BUMP*
Does anyone know? jeffeosso?
07 March 2006, 21:22
Rick 0311The terms Picatinny and 1913 are interchangeable when referring to scope bases...they are the same product.
07 March 2006, 22:07
KurtCPicatinny and M1913 are the same.
Standard and Weaver are the same.
From what I have seen, the width is very close. It is the shape of the beveled edges and the grooves that is different.
07 March 2006, 22:12
woodsracerquote:
Originally posted by KurtC:
From what I have seen, the width is very close. It is the shape of the beveled edges and the grooves that is different.
It looks like I need to just order the rings and see if the bevels on the edges of the rings and the groove on the receiver work together.
