Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
one of us |
I just lapped and mounted my scope and it is hitting about 10" high with the ajustment turret bottomed out. How much does .001 shim give at a 100 yds? Regards, JASON | ||
|
one of us |
Jason, Your 0.001" shim should move the bullet approximately 1" at 100 yards, depending on ring spacing. If you need to move 10 inches, plus have some adjustment available, you probably need about 0.020". This would be a piece of cake with Burris Signature ring offset inserts - you might want to consider them. Regards, Bill | |||
|
one of us |
Signature Rings from Burris with the Insert Kit. Particularly if using 2 piece bases. Sure beats putting a 0.020 bend in your scope Wally | |||
|
one of us |
Bill - thanks for the help. JASON | |||
|
one of us |
Jason, You're welcome! Wally brings up another good point - if you have a one-piece base, put the shim(s) the under the front of the base. If two piece, I have put a shim between the ring and the scope, but don't like to. If that is what you have to do though, consider "bedding" the bottom half of both rings (if split horizontally), the top halves generally tilt with the scope. Good luck with it, Bill | |||
|
one of us |
I'm curious as to what the cause of your problem is/was. What model gun was this and whose rings did you use? Sounds like you either got the wrong rings for the gun or there was some mistake by the ring maker OR perhaps you overlapped the rings. And Bill M: couldn't shimming even a one piece base potentially cause the rings to misalign? Seems to me it could. Of course, the desired end result is two rings properly aligned with each other and in relation to the bore however you get there! [ 09-05-2003, 21:49: Message edited by: sonofagun ] | |||
|
one of us |
I'm curious as to what the cause of your problem is/was. What model gun was this and whose rings did you use? Sounds like you either got the wrong rings for the gun or there was some mistake by the ring maker OR perhaps you overlapped the rings. And Bill M: couldn't shimming even a one piece base potentially cause the rings to misalign? Seems to me it could. Of course, the desired end result is two rings properly aligned with each other and in relation to the bore however you get there! | |||
|
one of us |
My setup is a 700 SA, IOR HD 2 piece bases, Leupold PRW low rings, to mount a Zeiss conquest 3-9. IOR says the bases are std 0moa but the outcome showed somewhere around 20moa. JASON | |||
|
<G.Malmborg> |
FLORA66, Like Paul Harvey say's, "And now for the rest of the story". Based on this information, let me revise my previous post. The first thing I would do, would be to lay a straightedge across both front and rear base and make sure that the straightedge and the receiver are parallel. You will be able to see a 20 minute rake. If the base is not parallel, then you will need to start with one that is... Good luck, Malm | ||
new member |
Let's start from scratch. double check that the rings have not beem switched, front to back etc. When I have to shim rings that have already been lapped, I mount the rings to the scope, to maintain alignment, then put the selected shims under the base along with some J B Weld or epoxy to keep the proper angle that the shims have provided. (leave the base screws loose, or if you can not get to them do not forget to align the holes) You do not want to tighten the screws untill the epoxy hardens. Thinking back I have only done this on one piece bases, but I am sure that you can adapt it in some way to fit your problem. Bernie | |||
|
one of us |
quote:I guess if you put enough force on it (and the base is strong enough), it could cause the receiver to warp! So, I guess the short answer to the question is "yes". However, if the shim(s) are applied properly, located adjacent to and on both sides of the appropriate mounting screw (or between two closely-spaced screws), the shim should be under a relatively uniform compression force, and should not apply a moment, or torque, to the base, and thus should have the same alignment/straightness that it originally had. I have three scopes that are currently mounted with a shim placed/bedded in the bottom of one of the rings, between a lower ring half and the scope tube (couldn't get Burris signature rings for these applications). One of the scopes is on a target rifle and is regularly removed/replaced at the receiver (rings stay with the scope), with no noticeable change in zero. No problems thus far. Maybe not the "proper" way to fix it, but sometimes you do what you have to.... Bernie has my "procedure" down - if properly "bedded" nothing should be in a bind, as the bedding should ensure the loads are uniformly applied from the rings to the scope tube. A little bedding compound in both lower ring halves, place shim, coat shim with a little more bedding compound, place scope in bottom ring halves, put ring top halves on, ALIGN CROSSHAIRS, and "snug" the screws. Tighten the screws only after bedding compound has fully cured. Unfortunately (or fortunately, depending on how you look at it), I do not know what the rings/scope tube will look like if you ever take it apart, but I bet it ain't pretty.... G. Malmborg is correct, and I should have waited for him to weigh-in before I stepped up to the plate, or stuck to the original question - .001" shim will move POI approximately one inch at 100 yards.... Will I ever learn to keep my mouth shut?... Regards, Bill | |||
|
<G.Malmborg> |
quote:I see nothing wrong with your method of shimming a mount. If it provides solid, repeatable performance, then it is "proper". Regards, Malm | ||
one of us |
I believe I was assuming if you START with a one piece base which fits the receiver PERFECTLY (zero stress on base and receiver when tightened down without any shims)and PERFECTLY aligns the rings, and then shim either front or rear of the base, you WILL introduce stress and misalign the rings. Again, the desired end results are rings perfectly aligned with each other and in correct relation to the bore and with zero stress on any mount components. As I understand it, one piece bases are less desirable because of their inherent alignment and fit problems. Think about it - scopes are manufactured to millionth of an inch tolerances and then mounted with .001" - .01" allowances - ! In any case, have we figured out the cause of the original poster's problem yet? [ 09-10-2003, 04:32: Message edited by: sonofagun ] | |||
|
one of us |
sonofagun, I am not disagreeing with you, but if you're going to shim, you have to put it somewhere. I'd rather put the shim under one end of a one-piece base than between the ring and the scope tube. If you bed/shim it as described above, I'd be surprised if you could measure the change (with "common" inspection equipment). If you shim one of a two-piece base setup, I'd about guarantee that the rings wouldn't line up. And I am not aware of any ring/base combinations that readily allow you to shim between the base and the ring (still probably wouldn't line up). The best would be to check out everything that Malm suggested, and if the mount absolutely requires canting, re-machine the bottom of the one piece base to match the receiver, at the desired angle. Or use Burris signature rings & offset inserts - still the preferred method in my mind. Thank you, Malm - that is the bottom line! Regards, Bill | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia