one of us
| this could be an interesting post, but think you forgot the pic, but maybe I missed something |
| Posts: 1868 | Location: League City, Texas | Registered: 11 April 2003 |
IP
|
|
Moderator
| GG, he's talking about the shilen DAmn Good Action DGA..
I have one, target solid bottom... great action.. other than my savage 99, i think it's the only push feed I own.
Mine is in 222, huge barrel, shoots in the 2's...
it's an interesting action, and i've only seen one other one.. It's more or less a model 700 with a savage extractor, and a nicer looking top than either...
400ish? for the action, add 100 for a trigger... 50-100 for a solid bottom, if youwant a target rifle... you can use rem stocks for them
jeffe |
| |
one of us
| I remember, the old shilen flat bottom actions, I havent seen on of them in long time. They had flat target bottom and mdl 70 like lug if I remember correctly. I think they quit making them 10 yr ago. I tried to buy one, but could not get one, they didnt make that many. |
| Posts: 1868 | Location: League City, Texas | Registered: 11 April 2003 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| They are nice. I owned two of the short action DGA Varmint rifles with light varmint contour barrels, a .220 Swift and a 6mm Rem. Very nice Claro walnut came on these rifles, and the triggers were superb. Mine were purchased in 1977, and at that time a complete rifle was in the $750-800 range if I recall correctly. Tight shooting rifles. The Swift accounted for more vermin than any rifle I've owned since.....but, alas, I sold them a few years ago. |
| Posts: 122 | Location: Halstad, MN USA | Registered: 24 October 2001 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| The DGA was an investment cast action and an action I admired. Although a bit heavy, it was attractive and looked to be ultra rigid. I ordered one in 1979 (it was about 275.00 at the time as I recall. When it arrived I fondled it for a bit then selected a Hart barrel to put on it that night. The threads were so far out of line there was a .006 gap on one side when the barrel was screwed in. On top of that, there was nearly .001 difference in thickness in the recoil lug from one side to the other. I had a mandrel turned on centers from a piece of barrel. When I slid this into the receiver I couldn't see light through the barrel! It was that bad. I called Ed Shilen and, after some discussion, we agreed I would return the action and receive another. The new one was better but not perfect. All in all I would have to classify the DGA as a disappointment to me. This was, after all, supposed to be a precision action and was priced as such. In essence the DGA was almost a Damn Good Action but fell just a little short IMO. Regards, Bill. |
| Posts: 3837 | Location: Elko, B.C. Canada | Registered: 19 June 2000 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| You had one of the early ones. I think they got all of that worked out later on. I was thinking that the later DGA's were milled, not investment cast, but I'm not sure. |
| Posts: 852 | Location: Austin | Registered: 24 October 2003 |
IP
|
|