Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
Moderator |
Read the 35 whelen 338-06 thread. I would further emphasise the point I made regarding 338 bullets not being as suitable for reduced velocities, as you'll be loosing ~400 fps over what the 338 win mag can do. You will also be paying a premium for reloading dies, vs std price for 358 win dies. It is my firm belief, the average lower 48 hunter can field no finer round then the 358 win for shots inside 200 yds, which compromise most folks hunting. The 35's just had the misfortune of being labled "woods rounds" which is horrible for marketing. That said, you'll find 35 shooters are a loyal lot, and used 358's, 350 rem mags and 35 whelens are a rare beast, cause they work, and you don't need to move them for something better. | |||
|
<Mike Dettorre> |
If you want a wildcat for the pleasure of a wildcat then get 338/08. The 338/08 and the 358 will have very little practical difference. Becuase of case capacity your 338/08 is probably going to limited to 210 grn bullets may be 225. The 358 is an honest 225yd-250yd round before drop starts to get pretty dramatic. the 338/08 probaly adds 20 yds to each of those numbers. If I wanted a wildcat and wanted 'efficient' non missle 338 I would look at a 338/284. Yes, of course you could do a 338 WSM which is just going to be a short 338 win mag. If you want a practical economical round that will take anything up to elk/moose to 225 yds and brown bear to any distance that your should be shooting one then get the 358 win. ------------------ The sole purpose of a rifle is to please its owner | ||
one of us |
The August issue of Petersen's Rifle Shooter has an article where the .338-08 is mentioned. There are a few handloads for it in the article. It should be a great deer to elk cartridge, pretty close to the .338-06. One of the handloads for it (in the article) develops around 2,670 fps with a 200-grain bullet. It shoots faster and flatter with some of the 180-grain Barnes X. There are numerous .338 bullets. Most are tough to handle high velocity and impact, but there are plenty of slightly softer bullets should you want to shoot the heavier ones. You could shoot the standard NOS Partitions, Barnes Original, Speer GS, Norma, Woodleigh, and a few others. Also, you could shoot a lightweight Barnes X without any problem. Go for it. I would if I had the extra money, but then I just love wildcats. | |||
|
<Don Martin29> |
I have been killing whitetails since 1966 with the .358 Winchester. It's "my" cartridge. For a long time I used the 200 gr Silvertip but all were handloads. This bullet is really a good performer but hard to get. Now I am using the 180 gr Speer Flat Point. This bullet kills deer faster than a 06 or a 7 mm Mag out to 240 yards. I suppose that the .338-308 will have some slight edge at long range over the .358 Winchester but not any big deal. You can load a 180 gr bullet in the .358 Win to at least as fast as out of the .338 bore or so common sense tells me. As long as the bullet is matched to the game results should be similar but given .338 vrs .358 I will go with the bigger bore anyday for killing power. | ||
one of us |
Don, it would be impossible to kill deer faster than my 7mm Rem mag, it has been nothing less than spectacular on deer. My hunting buddy, had a .358 for years, he switched to a 7mm Rem mag, said he never dropped a deer in it's tracks with the .358! | |||
|
<Oldmodel70> |
Been shooting a 358 for years, and have never been disappointed in it's performance. As a matter of fact, this caliber was the first of the old model 70s I acquired. And there is a large selection of great hunting bullets available for reloading. Also any of the 38-357 bullets will work too...I've reloaded everything from 90 grain lead wadcutters for plinking or starlings, up through the 140-150 hollowpoints for stray cats and other varmints, to the full metal jacketed slugs used for the steel animals. I remember a sly old crow sitting in an old maple 150 yds away, jeering at me, thinking he was safe. At the shot, a 140 gr 38 special jacketed hollowpoint in front of a max load of 4895, traveling close to 3000 ft per second, literally disintegrated that crow. And conversely an old heavy northern Minnesota buck, jumped out of heavy brush, and going straight away, took a 250 grain Silvertip right smack in the middle of his fat rear end, and piled up so fast he almost ran over his nose. The bullet being found later under the skin just below the neck. Yes, I think you would be well pleased with the good 358 Winchester. Grant. ------------------ | ||
<Mike Dettorre> |
GSF, Never dropped a deer in its tracks...hmmm. Lets see my 358 has 1 shot kills on 2 elk, 2 pigs, 1 kudu, 1 zebra...and you're right not in their tracks...the Zebra went 20 yds. ------------------ The sole purpose of a rifle is to please its owner | ||
<Gary Rihn> |
I've never seen so many 358 fans at once. [This message has been edited by Gary Rihn (edited 01-11-2002).] | ||
<Kimmo E> |
You guys have a lot of problem to create a 8*57 it works with 180-225grbullets to about 220y on moose. But it might be a better choise for you overseas with 338*57 or 9*57 with heavy bullets in standard actions. | ||
one of us |
I would go with the 358 Win, no special dies, and factory brass available. And yes, I have had "drop in their tracks" kills with the 358 using 250 RN Hornadys. | |||
|
one of us |
Every deer I have shot with my 8x57 has dropped in it's tracks, something I can't say for my .308 win. | |||
|
one of us |
Check out (www.sixgunner.com). There's a two part article by Paco Kelly on the .358 Win. that is an interesting read. Paul B. | |||
|
one of us |
I see no reason to own a wildcat when the 358 will do that same thing exactly and you can get factory ammo if you get seperated from your ammo...the advantage the 338 cal has over the 358 cal. is only in ones mind. both equal and both nice calibers in their various modes. ------------------ | |||
|
<Don Martin29> |
GFS1200, I have had only two deer go right down when hit with the 7mm mag and that was in the base of the neck with a 140 Nosler Partition at 50 ft. Shots like that do not really count. The other was hit in the ribs with a 120 Hornady at max velocity in the ribs at maybe 30 ft and it did not go far either. But the others all got up and ran. Most were shot at 50 to 100 yards with the 140 Sierra or the 130 Speer, all flat bases. All of these deer either ran, ran a long way or got up and ran. The one that ran a long way was hit in the lungs with a 160 gr Sierra BT at 50 yards. It was a big doe in Maine and she ran into a swamp. That took two hours to find. With the .358 Wincester I have used only the two bullets I mention above. They both have a lot of lead exposed and are suited to the game which is whitetails in the forest. Over and over I continue to be amazed at the knockdown and keep down power of this bullet. Back it 1967 I recall shooting a buck with a running snap shot at maybe 30 to 50 feet. I saw the cross hairs go off on it's belly as it quartered away. I said to myself "oh no I gut shot it" The buck did a nose dive and was down before I could eject the cartridge and if you have ever fired a 99 Savage you will know how fast they are to cycle. The only deer that ran was a buck that I shot it's LF leg off running at long range (I know it was too far) But there was lots of blood and it layed down and I found it. They all fall right down and stay right down when hit with the right bullet in the .358 Winchester. Not so with the 7mm Mag or the 30-06. And for that matter I rate the 30-06 as a better killer than Rem's 7 mag at woods ranges. | ||
one of us |
I've killed dozens with my 7mm Rem mag, I've only used one load, Hornady Custom 139gr Bt's, they chrono at 3200fps from my 26" Win Classic Stainless, it will put 3 shot's inside 3/4" at 100yds. Largest deer shot was 190lbs, longest range 287 yds, shortest 40yds, all were instantly dead, I mean slammed to the ground, never a twitch from any of them. Some were running, some wern't, some were neck shot, most were broadside lung shot's, the largest deer was running at about 90 yds, hit him a little far back, barely hit his lungs, didn't matter, he was dead as soon as the bullet hit him. I've shot deer with .243, 270, 308, 30-06, 7mm Rem Mag, and 12 guage buckshot. Nothing kills like the 7mm for me, the .270 was excellent, 308 a joke, never dropped anything in it's tracks, not a deer, or boar. | |||
|
<leo> |
The 8x57 and 57 types won't fit in a short action. How about going really wild and getting an 8mm-08, cool! | ||
one of us |
8-308 would be cool, how about 9.3-308 | |||
|
<Kimmo E> |
I�ll tink that a 9,3 or 9 or 8*08 would not be a good option for short actions because heavy (250-285) isnt fitting Kimmo | ||
one of us |
quote: A 9.3-308? It would be a rather slow cartridge: the slightly longer 9.3x57 has 2067 fps with 286 grains. And this wildcat would be still slower - as fast as a snow-ball. Fritz | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia