Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
One of Us |
Anybody have any idea just how much pressure in cup a swede mauser 96 can handle. Have a action an looking to build but undecided on caliber. | ||
|
One of Us |
The Swede Mauser military rifles were designed for pressures in the 45,000 psi range. | |||
|
One of Us |
Sarco had a batch of 96s from Husqvarna in 270. The .270 is rated for 65,000 psi, but that is really too much for a Mauser case head cartridge in mass production guns and ammo. IMHO that is why the 260 Rem got registered at 62,000 psi. The proof pressure for the 270 is between 84,500 and 91,000 psi. | |||
|
one of us |
Not only the 270 but the 220 swift as well. I know the military swedes were built around the 45k pressure of the 6.5 x 55 but the factory chambered so many 60k+ round in the thirties and forties that they must have known something a lot of people don't about the safe working limit of their commercial product relative to comaparable '96 actions from other countries/sources or their own mil-spec receiver. if you include the second generation or "Improved Mauser" variants then there is no doubt they can handle anything SAMMI or CIP have. They are '96 actions in basic design but cylindrical above the wood line and no thumb cut. They are sort of a transition between the '96 and the FN 98 actions they used shortly thereafter. "Experience" is the only class you take where the exam comes before the lesson. | |||
|
One of Us |
Actual testing has showed that the 96 can easily handle the same cartridges as the M98, but it is not as well constructed as the m98 considering gas flows. But just as well as a M70..... Bent Fossdal Reiso 5685 Uggdal Norway | |||
|
One of Us |
Dear Bent: What pressure proof loads did they use on the 1896 Mauser actions? Have you barreled the 1896 Mausers for hot cartridges like the 270 Winchester, and did you have them re-case hardened and/or re-heat treated? The ones I have looked at by Carl Gustav are beautifully made, but as you said do not appear to have all the gas safety features as the 1898 Mauser. How's the 458 Win. Mag. Ackley project progressing? Did you get my reamer print? Sincerely, Chris Bemis | |||
|
one of us |
/ | |||
|
one of us |
No, all it really means is that they were safe when proofed. Aut vincere aut mori | |||
|
one of us |
/ | |||
|
One of Us |
They can import and sell CZ52 pistols in the USA. A lot of those wouldn't pass anything for proof test. The bottom of the chamber is paper thin and the metallurgy of the barrels is all over the map. They blow up regularly with factory ammo. The American load books have cut the pressure in half, but there is still plenty of surplus Tokarev ammo around. | |||
|
one of us |
Alf, this statement is what I am responding to. There is no guarantee that any rifle is safe, especially used. One should take care to inspect each rifle pior to use. As I said, those Husky's are used. They were safe when made but much may have transpired since then. I think you took my comment the wrong way. Additionally, it seems to me that Europeans take a different view on personal responsibility. Seems to me that they tend to acknowledge that shooting has certain inherent risks. Aut vincere aut mori | |||
|
one of us |
/ | |||
|
one of us |
Alf, None of what you said changes the validity of my statement. Interestingly, I have a Husky Sporter in my shop right now with setback. And it was chambered for the relatively sedate 6.5x55. Aut vincere aut mori | |||
|
one of us |
Z/ | |||
|
One of Us |
I think a swede rifle that setback with Hot handloads is very different from one set back with relatively sedate US manufactured ammunition. Then again, the hottest handloads I have assembled don't flatten OR crater the primer like any of the factory norma ammo does, much less the military issue ball ammo.... And my hottest handloads can be neck sized several times before I am forced to FL size to chamber it... I cannotsay the same thing about factory norma ammo... So I've gotta ask, what was fired in it? "Sedate" is a relative thing... the questions is "relative" to what? If I provoke you into thinking then I've done my good deed for the day! Those who manage to provoke themselves into other activities have only themselves to blame. *We Band of 45-70er's* 35 year Life Member of the NRA NRA Life Member since 1984 | |||
|
one of us |
As it was, no. The amount of setback did not leave enough extra case head unsupported to be an immediate concern especially at the relatively low pressures of US factory ammo. However, the setback would continue to worsen with continued use and at some point it could prove dangerous. Despite the relatively shallow setback there was noticable difficulty in opening the bolt after firing. The shop at the school in Susanville had several 96's sporterizied by Kimber. These were in .308 and maybe .270. They showed signs of serious setback. In these a case letting go would be a bad thing. Aut vincere aut mori | |||
|
one of us |
/ | |||
|
One of Us |
Allan, How can that be, doesn't Norma strictly follow those stringent CIP standards? | |||
|
one of us |
Alf, as do I. I really like the old Husky sporters, especially in 9.3x57. I recently got one of their 98's chambered in the same. No comparison, the 96 based sporter is much more nimble. I have a couple in 8x57 but I relegate those to Rem factory loads which they shot into tiny groups. If I need a hotter load I pull out one of my 98's in 8x57 or my 8x60S. I will continue to shoot 96's and will even build some but I will chamber them for cartridges that operate at about 45,000 cup. I've seen the aftermath of a case that let loose at 45,000 cup and one that was over 50K. the 45K failure required only another extractor to put it back into use. The 50K failure was not so pretty and brass did hit the shooter's glasses. Luckily he was wearing eye protection. Aut vincere aut mori | |||
|
One of Us |
Here's a quote from Harold McFarland in his book "Introduction to Modern Gunsmithing"
I'm in agreement that pre '98 actions should be used for 45,000 PSI cartridges at the most. /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// "Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." Winston Churchill | |||
|
One of Us |
Sorry, I know that the CZ52 was not CIP, and maybe what I wrote was misleading. Being a sleazy consultant, it is my nature to change the subject or research to something I know more about, so I can sell my old ideas If I had a point, it would be that the 96 can be shot all day at the threshold of Mauser case head yield with less danger than one shot of factory ammo with the CZ52 pistol.
vapodog, You wrote "quote" but you gave a rough paraphrase I am a big fan of MacFarland's book, what he actually wrote was:
There is no inner stop ring in M70s, Savage 110s, Rem 700s, or 91/30s after 1942. Companies that want to cut costs, often cut the inner stop ring out. They are not a good an action as a 98 Mauser, but that doesn't stop them from doing the 65,000 psi .270. I have taken 1895 Chilean Mausers and 1896 Swedish Mausers up to the sticky bolt load, and I feel confident that they are strong, but have the same crappy gas handling as American sporting arms. The Rem700 will hold the gas at the breech with the weak extractor, but is gassy with the good Sako extractor. The rem does not have the firing pin gas filter of the 98 Mauser. | |||
|
One of Us |
I appreciate all the feedback, but just to let you know I sold that action to jim kobe. my previous experence with the swede is in a sporterized military version with a shortend original steped military barrel. That particular gun at 90 plus years old shots 3/8 inch groups at 100 with handloads as long as they dont get over 2500 fps. The moral to this story is ( ah i changed my mind and order a montana rifleman barreled action in 338-06) | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia