one of us
| I don't understand your question. The spacing of the rear hole from what? |
| | | Posts: 1366 | Location: Houston, TX | Registered: 10 February 2003 | 
IP
|
|
one of us
| A couple of the early ones that I saw had a .330" hole spacing.. |
| | |
one of us
| Dan will tell us the whole truth, but I believe that if you have not yet received your action, you'll find mount holes for both the .330" and the .860" (I believe it is) spacing. I.e. 3 holes - of which one will be covered if you are sensible enough to use 2 piece base with a .860" spacing.
- mike |
| | | Posts: 6653 | Location: Switzerland | Registered: 11 March 2002 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| The M1999 is supposed to take many of its features from the "new" pre-1964 M70 action. My money is that the spacing is identaical to that of the original USRAC action. |
| | | Posts: 2758 | Location: Fernley, NV-- the center of the shootin', four-wheelin', ATVin' and dirt-bikin' universe | Registered: 28 May 2003 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| Sorry it took so long to get back to everyone on this one, I've been swamped!
I spoke with the owner and he stated that the Left Hand "LONG" actions will maintain the 3 holes on the rear bridge. He said that he is doing so in order for people to use a variety of bases on the rear. It will have both the .330 and .860 spacing.
On the "SHORT" actions we will go exclusively to the .860" spacing on the rear. |
| | |
one of us
| Thanks that is what I was after.
Chuck |
| | | Posts: 2659 | Location: Southwestern Alberta | Registered: 08 March 2003 |
IP
|
|
