I haven't shot it. It is a military surplus gun and I cleaned it up and found the defect when inspecting it. Is the gun worth keeping with this defect??
To give an opinion on whether it's worth keeping it would nice to know what you have and what you want to use it for.
The ring was caused by shooting the rifle with a bore obstruction. Sometimes the very best M-98 actions are found on bent, bulged, or rusted barrels.
Remember-- The country that got rid of that rifle did it for a reason. The ring in the bore may have been that reason and the gun is excellent otherwise.
If the ring is only 3 inches from the muzzle, then you've likely got enough length left for a viable barrel if you cut and recrown. As Belk says, it may shoot just fine like it is, and is not dangerous in any way. At any rate, nothing about the rifle is in any way affected other than the last 3 inches of barrel.
Posts: 13334 | Location: Henly, TX, USA | Registered: 04 April 2001
I have had to scratch my head at times over how well guns with barrels that are buldged back a short distance from the muzzle shoot. You would also be amazed how many spiders webs have screwed up good barrels.
As a general guide for those new to the sport, if you store ANY weapon for any period of time, it would not hurt to give it a "once thru" with a patch before taking it out shooting...
Probably caused by shooting with oil in barrel. My friend bought a rifle with 2 such rings mid way along the bore despite me warning him to inspect for that exact thing. Shot fine.
Posts: 2258 | Location: Bristol, England | Registered: 24 April 2001