The Accurate Reloading Forums
Preferred standard and dual dovetail bases?

This topic can be found at:
https://forums.accuratereloading.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/9411043/m/52610934

28 July 2002, 09:44
<rigfer>
Preferred standard and dual dovetail bases?
What are the preferred standard and dual dovetail bases? Weight, style, finish, strength, material strength, rusting...
28 July 2002, 03:25
Ed
I have a number of dual dovetails on my rifles. They are hell-for-stout, fool-proof (nothing to loosen), good-looking (IMO) and weigh about the same as the STD's. I guess the only downside is there is no windage adjustability, but I have never needed it. They are definately my preferred non-detachable mount. I only wish they made them for my Mauser actioned rifles.
28 July 2002, 08:29
BIG SAM
Since LEUPOLD came out with the DDT, I find it hard to use any other set-up. I have a couple of Warne base/ring sets that are not QR, and they are working well also.

In my experience, I don't think that you could do better, only different and more expensive.


SAM
30 July 2002, 09:20
<Cossack>
Granted, dovetail rings are strong and clean looking. Some of my Contender setups
require the scope to be more forward than double dovetails allow without using extension rings. That's when Weaver base and Burris Z rings really shine. And the Signature Z rings have inserts that can compensate for vertical or horizontal allignment problems.