222 Remington magnum
7mm TCU
7mm IHMSA
308x1.5"
300 WSM
In due course, we hope to build rifles for them and develop loads.
I think I will start with the 222 Remington magnum.
------------------
saeed@ emirates.net.ae
www.accuratereloading.com
What is the .308 x 1.5? I've never heard of it. Specialized cartridge, perhaps? Maybe a benchrest proposition.
------------------
Happiness is a 200 yard bughole.
quote:
Originally posted by Saeed:
We have just received teh following reamers.222 Remington magnum
7mm TCU
7mm IHMSA
308x1.5"
300 WSMIn due course, we hope to build rifles for them and develop loads.
I think I will start with the 222 Remington magnum.
Good choice on the 222 Magnum. I've had one for a long time, wonderful little cartridge. The 223 did it in, but I still love it.
This cartridge was developed by Barnes. I just thought it will be fun to shoot.
DB Bill,
I will gladly develop some loads for the 300 WSM, but we ahve no dies or cases yet.
------------------
saeed@ emirates.net.ae
www.accuratereloading.com
RR
What are the ballistics on the cartridge? Short or long action? Accuracy?
The questions pour forth, but these are the important ones.
------------------
Happiness is a 200 yard bughole.
quote:
Originally posted by Nobade:
With VV N133 it can easily equal factory .308 ballistics with the 168 Matchking and 175 Amax. Amazing little thing!
Nobade,
Shouldn't that read: "With VV N 133 and dangerously high pressure it can equal factory .308 ballistics"?
There are no free lunches.
-- Mats
R.G. Robinett at bibrob@pionet.net is a real guru with the 30BR. I'm sure he would love to talk about it (he won't quit talking about it). He also owns BIB bullet company http://benchrest.com/bib/ that produces some of the best benchrest bullets you can buy.
I know it sounds like an ad for him but the 30BR is really giving the 6PPC some competition and R.G is the guy to ask about it.