One of Us
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e1dc7/e1dc7ed1836d7992cac0188a1b2c5c3fe4592bdd" alt="Picture of dpcd Picture of dpcd"
| Pre 64s are not the same. Especially if made for H&H caliber. I will check my book later on the details. |
| |
One of Us
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e1dc7/e1dc7ed1836d7992cac0188a1b2c5c3fe4592bdd" alt="Picture of dpcd Picture of dpcd"
| Your rifles were made in 1950 and 1951. the later one should have the standard hole spacing. Those made in 1950 in H&H calibers may or may not be drilled at all on the ring; so could have been done post factory. None of the pre-war rifles were drilled on the bridge; only the ring. If yours isn't an H&H action, then I don't know. Uness it has a clip guide in which case it wasn't drilled either. |
| |
One of Us
| They're both defective. Pack them up and send to me and I will make sure they are properly disposed of!!!!!!
US Navy RETIRED NRA LIFE MEMBER
|
| Posts: 526 | Location: Seattle | Registered: 17 June 2010 | data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f43c/9f43cfbee273e5f910094f8ed81926fb9375812d" alt="Reply With Quote Reply With Quote"
IP
|
|
One of Us
| Both are 300 H and H one orginal and one shooter with a plastic stock. Im excited about working up a load for the old classic round. Thanks elton |
| Posts: 239 | Location: branson mo | Registered: 28 April 2010 | data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f43c/9f43cfbee273e5f910094f8ed81926fb9375812d" alt="Reply With Quote Reply With Quote"
IP
|
|
One of Us
| I really enjoy my 300 H&H. Fun to shoot! It's my favorite hunting rifle. Really likes them 200 gr. Accubonds from Nosler.
US Navy RETIRED NRA LIFE MEMBER
|
| Posts: 526 | Location: Seattle | Registered: 17 June 2010 | data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f43c/9f43cfbee273e5f910094f8ed81926fb9375812d" alt="Reply With Quote Reply With Quote"
IP
|
|