One of Us
| Only if I were looking to buy it. On the other hand, one might include a mention of lines per inch and anything special regarding a particular pattern for the checkering, and maybe the finish, but measurements? Nope. |
| |
one of us
| I like to know such things, especially grip dimensions and various dimensions of the butt in relation to the center of the trigger.Also like to know fore arm length and if possible, length of tip, distance the swivel is from fore arm tip, etc. I may be weird, but I like to compare what I make with other guns that either "do it for me" or "don't do it for me."
Always tweaking things, plus I am a recovering engineer, so I like such measurements. |
| Posts: 2509 | Location: Kisatchie National Forest, LA | Registered: 20 October 2004 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| I'm with Mark, that kind of content turns an entertaining "eye-candy" article into something I cut out and file away. Irregardless of the quality of the phiotography, you need those critical measurements if you want to either incorporate a past master's ideas into your own projects or evaluate an arm you have in hand. Even if only presented in a sidebar, technical details elevate the quality of any article or book to another level.
Jay Kolbe
|
| Posts: 767 | Location: Seeley Lake Montana | Registered: 17 April 2002 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| Yeah I might can see where that might be of interest to those who like to compare dimensions. I myself would be more interested in the mechanical aspect of the firearm and how it actually performs. But if the writer is being paid by the number or words in the article, then I would definitely support his right to feed his family. |
| |
One of Us
| Michael, If I were reading an article about a custom gun, I would like to know the lpi of checkering. It the article, as you detailed, is about an early craftsman, I would like to know details about the grip, not to be able to copy it but to know what he liked to do. As far as the grip, a good way to detail it is length from the front edge to the center of the trigger, distance from the bore line to the front edge and the place where the plane of the trigger guard intersects the top line of the stock near the heel. |
| Posts: 4917 | Location: Wenatchee, WA, USA | Registered: 17 December 2001 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| Chic, I'm sure most figured it out but I think you meant the plane of the "grip cap" instead of "trigger guard".
Shane Thompson |
| Posts: 125 | Location: Soda Springs, ID 83276 | Registered: 25 August 2005 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| Shane you are right ... thanks. |
| Posts: 4917 | Location: Wenatchee, WA, USA | Registered: 17 December 2001 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| If this is a history of pre-1940 guns, it would be good to include all of the dimensions and details of the rifles. This would start a log of how the early custom makers worked. I would measure all fine guns that came into our shop to see the measurements. Style shaping of stocks have changed with the classic of today compared to the pre-1940's.
It would be good to add information about the makers from some of us older retired gunsmiths. I know of several makers from Texas that most of you probably have never read about. |
| |