Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
one of us |
TO all, I am just getting started and have been experimenting and researching different set-ups used when chambering barrels. Lookin gthrough the older manuals it seems that the preferred method back then was to use a live center to get teh barrel true and then support the barrel in the thread area with the steady rest and chamber that way. More recent text says to chuck the breech end in the chuck, extending the barrel though the spindle bore and out the rear of the bore, then use some type of simplt work support mounted in the back of the bore to center the muzzle end of the barre. Here is my question, when I found the lathe I though would do everything I wanted, I decided on a Jet 14x40ZX with the big 3 1/4" spimdle bore. I chose this machine because I will be doing 50 BMG work where barrels are often 36 inches long and sometimes over 2.5" in diameter. This machine is a big gear head machine and the spindle bore length is quite long. I coulduse a rear spindle support if the barrel is 30 inches or longer but for conventional barrel lengths, they will not reach though the bore. IS using the steady rest to support the breech end an accurate system or is it out dated? Will this technique produce results that would result in extreme range accuracy. Most of the rifles I will make will be for extreme range varminting and target work. What are your opinions on teh prefered work set up. Also will the steady rest provide an accurate enough hold to do extreme accuracy work? Thank for the opinions! Good Shooting!!! 50 | ||
|
one of us |
I always use a steady rest instead of holding the future chamber in the chuck jaws. I have heard that you may cut an out of round chamber because of the pressure of the jaws on the chamber section while cutting the chamber. When the jaw pressure is released the chamber section may spring out of round. Never wanted to possibly ruin a good barrel blank to test this theory. Any input welcome. | |||
|
one of us |
quote:You'd have to have a chuck key the size of the wrenches some guys are using to torque their barrels to 300ft/lbs Wally [ 07-28-2003, 09:35: Message edited by: wallyw ] | |||
|
One of Us |
Both methods will work very satisfactorily...through the chuck, or between centers. I certainly would not worry about chambering with the barrel chucked through the headstock. If you took all the benchrest barrels that have been been chambered that way and then have won benchrest matches, set records, etc., you'd likely have enough to fill a long freight train. Centering with the barrel in the headstock is probably best done by indicating the bore, or by indicating a range-rod placed in the bore, but properly centered I think the roundness of the chamber will be determined by the quality of the reamer and the quality of the workman. AC [ 07-29-2003, 00:09: Message edited by: Alberta Canuck ] | |||
|
one of us |
Thank you for the replies, I do have one other question for you, if I mounted the barrel in the chuck for chambering which you state is also very accurate, do I need to use some type of work holding devise on the back of the spindle bore to provide a two point hold, or will a centered barrel simply held in the chuck provide enough accuracy to do a quality chambering job? Thanks for the thoughts! Good Shooting!!! 50 | |||
|
one of us |
A spider is usally used on the back side of the spindle | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia