THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM GUNSMITHING FORUM


Moderators: jeffeosso
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Iron Sight Target Subtension
 Login/Join
 
one of us
posted
Does anyone have a formula to figure out the subtension(sp?) of a front sight on a target at X yards.
 
Posts: 273 | Location: Georgia | Registered: 24 May 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
It's just a similar triangles problem:

(sight width)/(Eye to sight distance) = (target coverage)/(Eye to target distance)

Remember to use the same units for all values, i.e. inches.

This is really why they taught us this crap in school. It wasn't so we could become rocket scientists or brain surgeons. I'd bet there are way more shooters than rocket scientists.
 
Posts: 276 | Location: Upstate NY | Registered: 16 December 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Thanks John, I should've thought of that myself but evidently had a brain fart.
 
Posts: 273 | Location: Georgia | Registered: 24 May 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I spoke too soon, looks like We'll have to modify the formula. I plugged in the following numbers sight width-.124, eye to sight-27.5, eye to target-1836, all in inches and ended up with a value of 8.278 inches, this is quite a bit more than my S&W covers at 50 yards. What have I done wrong?
 
Posts: 273 | Location: Georgia | Registered: 24 May 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of AZ Pete
posted Hide Post
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Lewis50:
I spoke too soon, looks like We'll have to modify the formula.

Have you tried it at the range? The formula seems to be correct, and as an example my 45-70 sight subtends 8" at 100 yards. That is on a 28" barrel. I haven't done the math on that rifle, but 8" at 50 yards seems reasonable on a pistol.


NRA Patron Life Member
 
Posts: 309 | Location: Arizona | Registered: 24 January 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
While target shooting yesterday at a 3" orange dot useing a 6-o'clock hold from the bench, I noticed the front sight was very close to that width when I superimposed it on the dot at 50 yards. The point of this exercise is to come up with the theoritical subtention so I can make a square box that is the same observed width as the sights at any given range, then with a 6-o'clock hold the horizontal sight displacement would be easier to see. I agree with you that 8" seems correct for 100 yards, just too wide for 50.
 
Posts: 273 | Location: Georgia | Registered: 24 May 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Mea Culpa,
I just set up a calibrated target at 50 yards and the formula is correct, the front sight appears to be a bit over 8" wide. I guess my memory from yesterday is failing as fast as my eyesight. Thanks again JohnD.
 
Posts: 273 | Location: Georgia | Registered: 24 May 2002Reply With Quote
new member
posted Hide Post
I wrote a very small & simple program to make the calculations. You just need to enter the sight radius (distance between front & rear sights)of your rifle and the program will tell you the rest.

I can e-mail it to you (or anyone else for that matter) if your interested. Me e-mail is Sean.Kettley@nscc.ca.

Cheers,

kettlesd
 
Posts: 7 | Registered: 19 January 2005Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia