THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM GUNSMITHING FORUM


Moderators: jeffeosso
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Muzzlebrakes
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted
Approximate cost if possible and have they ever been known to effect accuracy in a negative way?


sjadventures@cableone.net
 
Posts: 105 | Registered: 07 June 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
My muzzle brakes run $235 installed and are custom built one at a time for every gun.
 
Posts: 460 | Location: Auburn CA. | Registered: 25 March 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Westpac
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Jimmy Barnes:
Approximate cost if possible and have they ever been known to effect accuracy in a negative way?


Yes they can cause accuracy problems if they are not aligned with the bore.


_______________________________________________________________________________
This is my rifle, there are many like it but this one is mine. My rifle is my best friend, it is my life.
 
Posts: 3171 | Location: SLC, Utah | Registered: 23 February 2007Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I'm a looong ways from being a gunsmith but I've got quite a bit of experience using/shooting muzzlebrakes. As Westpac said, a brake, like almost anything on a rifle, can negatively affect accuracy if improperly installed. Also, while I've never tried it, shooting with a brake not screwed all the way on would likely be a negative.

On my everday rifle, a very accurate custom .300 WM, it seems to shoot about 1/2 MOA off zero with most loads with the brake removed. This is a small enough margin that I used it without a brake for 9 days of hunting that I just returned from. I only screwed it on for the last shot of the hunt, which was a 250 meter steep uphill very gusty dead crosswind shot on a mountain zebra. The shot was successful and the zebra then proceeded to a fall about 60 or 80 meters down the hill. In fact, the small margin of error, brake or no brake, probably would not have made any difference, but the confidence factor of knowing the rifle was "there" with the brake on made the extra noise worthwhile for me for those particular circumstances.

I like brakes, but with most designs there is a high price to pay in noise both for the shooter and anyone in his area. There are some brakes which are supposedly less noisy but I haven't used them so can't comment. I think brakes are wonderful inventions but recommend them for pre-hunt practice (the more the better) when you can be double muffed and then check your zero brakeless and hunt that way. My personal opinion is that if you are using a guide or PH it is damn inconsiderate to hunt with a brake. As has been noted many times, recoil when shooting a game animal is usually not a factor. YMMV.


xxxxxxxxxx
When considering US based operations of guides/outfitters, check and see if they are NRA members. If not, why support someone who doesn't support us? Consider spending your money elsewhere.

NEVER, EVER book a hunt with BLAIR WORLDWIDE HUNTING or JEFF BLAIR.

I have come to understand that in hunting, the goal is not the goal but the process.
 
Posts: 17099 | Location: Texas USA | Registered: 07 May 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I use the one-inch diameter Shrewd from Brownells. It turns my 300WSM into a 243Win. I can shoot it all day with no pain or flinching. I love it...
 
Posts: 16534 | Location: Between my computer and the head... | Registered: 03 March 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of 303Guy
posted Hide Post
Wouldn't a reflex suppressor have the same effect without the noise? I have one on my hornet and it reduces the rifle 'jump' when shooting off my rest. (I let it ly loosely when I shoot it).


Regards
303Guy
 
Posts: 2518 | Location: New Zealand | Registered: 02 October 2007Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia