Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
one of us |
Gents, I understand how a rifle can jam if a loose cartridge (or even a case) is laying loose on top of the magazine, and the bolt is pushed forward, stripping off the next cartridge, and then trying to feed both of them into the chamber. What I'm trying to figure out is how it can happen while extracting a fired case and trying to reload the next round. I would think the brass would fly free long before the next cartridge was picked up. The rifle in questions is an older Sako owned by the guide who got mauled on Admirality Island last week. Here's the story again... Petersburg guide survives attack by wounded bear By PETER PORCO, The Associated Press ANCHORAGE (April 28, 8:36 am ADT) - Scott Newman of Petersburg says he's naturally a calm person. He proved it Monday night as a wounded brown bear on Admiralty Island crunched the bones of his left foot and moved up to chew on his leg while Newman methodically tried to free a jam in his rifle. By the time the bear chomped on his inner thigh, Newman let go of the rifle and his hope for another shot and tried pushing the animal away with his hands. The bear then began cracking the bones of his right hand and forearm. Newman, a 39-year-old hunting and fishing guide, told the story of his mauling Tuesday by telephone from his bed at Sitka Community Hospital. He was bandaged and in splints. Doctors had yet to close his puncture wounds, so as to let them drain. He was in a lot of pain, he said. Nevertheless, he spoke matter-of-factly, going over details with precision, and blaming himself for two mistakes, neither of them very rare on guided hunts. Newman has been guiding for 17 years, 12 of them as proprietor of his own business. He is called a "superb guide" on the Web site of Field & Stream magazine. Monday was the last day of a 10-day bear hunt in the vicinity of Pybus Bay in the southeast corner of Admiralty, about 75 miles south of Juneau. His client was a textile businessman from Mexico City. Others on the trip included the client's wife; Newman's 15-year-old nephew, Levi Newman, who worked as his assistant guide; and a cook. "We saw only 10 bears for the whole trip," Newman said. That included a decent-sized bear on the fifth day, which they let go. On Monday, from Newman's skiff on Little Pybus Bay, they spotted a boar along the beach of the small peninsula that separates the smaller bay from the bigger one. "I parked the skiff downwind of the bear and we did our final stalk on foot," Newman said. The bear busied itself behind a bunch of driftwood logs. They'd see a leg, then its head. It seemed to back away. Newman next made the first of his mistakes, he said: He left the side of his hunter and crawled toward the water for a better look. When the bear started climbing over the logs, the client became excited and fired two or three rounds. "I wasn't able to whisper, 'Wait 'til he turns his side,'" Newman said. He now fired several rounds of his own, big 400-grain bullets from a .416 Remington Magnum. "I think I got a frontal shot," he said. "I thought I really hit him hard. I was pretty confident he'd be dead" in the brush where the animal ran. Now came what Newman considers his second mistake. It was 7 p.m. and would be dark in two hours. He didn't want to wait until morning to skin the bear, not with another hunt coming up in a few days. He decided then to follow it, to ensure it was dead and to skin the carcass while they had light. Newman found a large pool of blood where the bear had been hit and a spoor leading away from the beach into the brush. He zigzagged across the trail, circling quietly. It was clear the bear was bleeding from both sides. Newman guessed it had been hit as many as half-a-dozen times. "I was fairly concerned because he'd gone quite a ways. There was dark blood. I knew he was hurt, but I didn't think he was mortally wounded, so I probably had a live animal on my hands." Newman was looking at the ground when he heard a twig break. He slipped the safety off and heard a low roar. "He was ticked off," he said. "He appeared instantaneously. He looked like a freight train coming at me. I knew I had to make the shot really count. I took an extra split second, leaned into it and torched it off. I was fairly certain I hit him in the chest." He worked the bolt to chamber a second round but "short-stroked it," jamming the rifle. "Damn," he said as the bear barreled forward, knocking him down. "Now I'm on my back kicking this bear in the head, trying to get him off me. He's biting my left foot, giving me a compound fracture, crunching the bones in my left leg. I'm trying to get my gun to work." Newman feared that a bad tear in his thigh could sever the femoral artery, so when the bear bit him there, he switched tactics. After the boar chomped his hands, however, it broke off suddenly, turned to the side, turned back as if still interested in Newman, but finally walked away. "When he dropped down, he appeared very sick," Newman said. He thinks the bear, found dead later just yards from that spot, was then only moments from dying. "It was that frontal shot at 10 feet," Newman said. "It was a mortal shot, and he had just another 30 seconds to live, and in the meantime he chewed on me very good." As soon as the bear turned away, Newman grabbed his rifle and ran 25 yards away - on Adrenalin, he said. "I sat down and started yelling for help, then realized I had my hand-held (radio) and called the Coast Guard. ... 'I need a helicopter now,'" he told them, worried still about the femoral artery. The artery was intact, although Newman did lose a lot of blood. But he never lost consciousness. "I had a definite sense of calmness. I was very calm about the whole thing. I don't know where it came from. That's just the way I am. I was never freaked out about it. I just knew what I had to do to get out of that situation." Levi Newman and a man from a nearby lodge helped stabilize him until he was evacuated by Coast Guard helicopter 90 minutes after the mauling. Levi also worked to skin the bear and get the hide and the others back to Petersburg on Tuesday evening. PLEASE!!! Let's stick to the mechanics of the issue, and not debate pushfeed vs crf. Thanks | ||
|
one of us |
The Sako has a fixed ejector. Not pulling the bolt back all the way will cause the case to remain in the rifle. Pushing the bolt forward and trying to rechamber an empty expanded case may not allow the bolt to return to battery, especially if the small extractor does not hold the case perfectly in line. I didn't read anything in the report about a double-feed. | |||
|
one of us |
Thanks Kurt, I titled the post 'short stroke jams' because that's how the guide described it. I mentioned double feeds because I understand those, but wasn't sure it was the cause of this jam. | |||
|
one of us |
BW: I've seen this happen a few times when the shooter is under stress. It happens as you describe in your original post. A lot of factory rounds are made short so they'll fit in any brand of magazine. During recoil these rounds in the magazine slide forward with the bullet against the front of the magazine. Depending on the rifle, this can leave quite a gap at the back of the magazine. When the bolt is short stroked before ejecting the fired brass, it will pick up the next in line. | |||
|
one of us |
Quote: Allen, I'm afraid that I don't follow your reasoning here. The two times that I have been around short-stroke jams in the hunting field both involved controlled round feed rifles. Both, incidentally, were Mauser '98 type actions. In both cases the hunters did not bring the bolt far enough to the rear to eject the fired case, and as the bolt moved forward with the fired case stayed on the bolt face, but at a slight angle to the right (over the top of the next round obviously). The mouth of the fired case hit the right side of the front action ring. This effectively "jammed" the action until the hunters realized what had happened, and fully retracted the bolt to eject the fired case in one instance ( manually removed the fired case in the other). Certainly this can happen to a push feed as well (particularly with a fixed ejector), but it would be less likely with the spring plunger ejector that many push feed actions have since the fired case is ejected as soon as the mouth clears the front action ring. I could see where you might be referring to the type of jam that could occur after the fired case is ejected in a push-feed action and the bolt starts to move forward without going fully to the rear. In this case IF THE FEEDING IS NOT QUITE RIGHT it could allow the next round to sit high enough to be forced forward part way into the chamber causing a jam. This could be due to the feed rails, magazine follower, or in combination with the magazine spring being too strong. This could also happen to a controlled-feed action if the ejector is a little long, allowing the empty to be ejected before the bolt is fully to the rear and the bolt moved forward before getting back past the rim of the following round. No, I am not saying that a push feed is better for hunting. What I am saying is that this type of jam falls more under the heading of user error or poor quality control than design error in the majority of instances. Jim | |||
|
one of us |
Jim, I just checked my two M70's. One a 1950 30-06 the other a 1991 Classic in .270. With both rifles the ejector hits the chambered cartridge before the bolt is far enough back to pick up the next round from the magazine. Could the two rifles you have seen fail like this have had shortend ejectors? | |||
|
one of us |
Quote: dSmith, Both of these rifles were unaltered since they came from their makers. One was a Brno in 458 Win Mag, and the other was a German Mauser '98 "Guild Gun" that I don't recall the caliber on. Some Mark X actions seem prone to this problem as well (you are on the right track with your short ejector question). I have personally owned a Whitworth 375 (which I bought new in about 1974), that I could induce this problem in when not working the bolt forcefully. I also had the same problem with a new Whitworth action in 375 length, and a 404 Jeffery built on a Mark X magnum length action. In these cases the extractor claw seemed to be exerting a little too much pressure on the cartridge rim(if that is possible ), and was not allowing easy release of the fired case. This was compounded by the ejectors not acting on the fired case until the very end of rearward bolt travel. In all three of these cases I solved the problem by using a longer ejector rather than altering the extractor, as I didn't want to make any changes that might lead to extractor failure. I started with a standard length Mark X ejector, and shortened it a little bit at a time until a loaded round would just clear the front receiver ring on ejection. Now they all function reliably, but they still require more force to release the case from the bolt face than most Mauser type actions. Jim | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia