Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
one of us |
Carcano, I understand perfectly what is being said here. .257 equates to 6.5mm. I just don't agree with some of the statements that have been made here. They are confusing and misleading to someone who might be just starting out in reloading and I don't think we are doing those people any favors here with this discussion. I'm glad that we can agree on one thing though and that is the fact that good beer should not be wasted. As for the crow pie.....I don't eat it unless I'm wrong!! Jim | |||
|
one of us |
Carcano91, I think the point Jim was making was to save someone from taking their head off. A new reloader could easily get confused and have a serious problem. I think some of the sarcasm could be put on the shelf in the interest of safety. Stepchild | |||
|
one of us |
Well, ya'll had me second guessing what my buddies .257 Roberts really was. I see lots of 6.5mm dia bullets, and they all say .264" on them too, not once did I see a .257" say 6.5mm. I'd think someone could have in all their efforts here, as Jim did, spelled it out for the guys reading that wouldn't know. Seems that reloading manuals do not recognize the 257 Roberts as a 6.5mm in the sense most understand it... that it shoots the commonly recognized 6.5mm/.264" bullet, to me that's the important thing here, and you all had plenty of opportunity to admit. You're right tho, we all have a responsibility to know what our guns shoot, regaurdless of what might be typed or spoken to make a point, claimed or whatever. I certainly take responsibility for my actions, and blame no one for my lack of brains when I make the ultimate decision and pull the trigger. I ain't here to babysit, but I try and do my best not to mislead. Ultimately, it's in your court... Damnit, I thought my buddies was a 6.5 after all, why the hell they don't make a 140 SMK for the 257 is beyond me, but it sure could use one. [ 09-25-2003, 12:10: Message edited by: Brent Moffitt ] | |||
|
one of us |
There's a whole world of confusion and danger awaiting those who misunderstood my post. To be clear, The following combinations must not be attempted: 260 Remington with .260" bullets. 340 Weatherby with .340" bullets. 380 Special with .38" bullets. 404 Jeffery with .404" bullets. 6.53 Scramjet with 6.53mm bu - oh, wait, that works. 7mm Remington Magnums, with 7mm bullets. 577 T-Rex with .577" bullets. 577-416 Martini Henry with EITHER 577" or .450" bullets. Bullets for your 9.3x63 Brenneke with those for your 9.3x72 Rimmed. I'm tired of typing, so the rest of you will just have to slug your barrel! To be ultra clear, the bullets that go in "6.5mm" guns are .264", which is NOT equal to 6.5mm. The reason they say "6.5mm" on the box is NOT because the bullets measure 6.5mm, but because the gun they are to be shot in has a 6.5mm HOLE in the barrel. {I say this all in good fun! Forgive me for not worrying about "new, impressionable reloaders." like I said, if they screw this up, there's no telling what else they're going to to do.) | |||
|
one of us |
quote:They don't, Brent, and may I serve you too a plate of the remaining pie and a few black feathers ? Not a single 6,5mm diameter bullet measures or says on its box .264". Period. You are confusing bullet diameter with caliber indication - which are two *very* different shoes. Bwana-be has pointed that out. And it was - as appears - quite necessary that he pointed it out. Carcano [ 09-25-2003, 19:31: Message edited by: carcano91 ] | |||
|
one of us |
quote:So true Brent. I think this fascination with 6.5, 7 or even 8mm is a purely European thing. Don't ask me why, but in Europe there are a bunch of people putting a lot of stock in bullet diameter in milimeters (mm). So, we have 6.5 mm bullets, 7mm bullets and 8mm bullets - none of which actually measure either 6.5mm (.264" = 6.7mm), 7mm (.284" = 7.2mm) or 8mm (.318 = 8.08mm, .323 = 8.2mm). Confused? Don't worry, just join the club. So to make matters worse, sometimes Europeans insist on speaking about calibers in terms of (fairly) exact mm diameters. Because when you convert from inches to milimeters, a .257" bullet is actually pretty close to 6.5 mm (.257" = 6.53mm) and a .270 cal bullet actually becomes a 7mm (.277" = 7.04mm). In these situations Europeans love to talk about the "other" 6.5mm caliber (meaning the .257" - a caliber little used or offered in Europe). Confusion reigns supreme! But what else could you expect from somebody who knowingly created two different 8mm calibers: 8mm (.318") and 8mmS (.323"). I mean, that is a pretty dumb idea as well, and bound to confuse the heck out of people forever. So, my suggestion is just to forget about the whole thing. Europeans like to think their system for cartridge denomination is better than the US system - after all it is more systematic/scientific since it contains the "actual" dimensions of the cartridge: look the dimensions are right there -> 7x64. But in reality it is questionable how much more that REALLY tells you compared to the totally non-systematic US cartridge nomenclature. Other than that I'm sure it is an interesting discussion which 6.5mm caliber is the *REAL* 6.5mm. Have fun discussing this. - mike [ 09-25-2003, 20:59: Message edited by: mho ] | |||
|
one of us |
Ok, they say 6.5mm or 6.5mm caliber one or the other along side the .264 dia on the box, as I'm sure you knew that was my point. The .257 dia do not say 6.5mm on them, the .264's do. True, they do not say 6.5mm "dia" next to the .264" dia. I'll eat my pie now. | |||
|
one of us |
Hmmmm, not that this may interest anybody, but since I posted yesterday I went home and had a look at my reference material. It actually transpires, that there was a period (maybe from end of the 19th into about the middle of the 20th century) where no less than 2 caliber groups were actually designated "6.5mm" in Europe. This was a bit surprising to me, but at least it provides an explation for why the Europeans seem to have a tendency to talk of 6.5mm for both .257" and .264" calibers. I found at least the following "6.5mm" caliber designations with .257" bullets: 6.5x52R (apparently equivalent to a US caliber 25-35), 6.5x58R and 6.5x70R. Amazingly, during the same period, at least the following .264" caliber cartridges were also designated 6.5mm: 6.5 Carcano, 6.5x54 Mannlicher Schoenauer, 6.5x55, 6.5x57. Cartridge history never ceases to amaze me - mike | |||
|
one of us |
And just for shits and giggles, the 256 Newton, which uses 264 bullets. - Dan | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 2 |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia