THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM GUNSMITHING FORUM

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Guns, Politics, Gunsmithing & Reloading  Hop To Forums  Gunsmithing    Please Help! M70 "Classic" Ejection Problem

Moderators: jeffeosso
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Please Help! M70 "Classic" Ejection Problem
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted
My Classic Safari Express Model 70 (375 H&H caliber) is crushing case mouths almost half shut when I eject the cases at normal (fairly brisk) speed. The cases leave brass marks on the outside of the receiver, and they are mostly smacking the rear edge of the receiver, just in front of the where the bolt handle is when the action is closed. I have verified this is actually where the cases are hitting by putting layout dye here and seeing marks in the layout dye and blue dye on the ejected cases.

I asked Winchester customer service, and they said, yes, that this is how they are designed. I asked my gunsmith, and he asked why I don't pull the bolt back more slowly so the cases don't get crushed.

I practice shooting the way I shoot in the field (cycling the action quickly after a shot), but I want to get more than two or three shots out of a case before the mouth splits from work hardening.

What would you do to the rifle so that the cases can be ejected briskly without getting damaged?

Thanks,

H. C.
 
Posts: 3691 | Location: West Virginia | Registered: 23 May 2001Reply With Quote
Moderator
posted Hide Post
Bitch, bitch, bitch! [Big Grin] Honestly, Henry, just practice the way you want and don't worry about the cases!

You know, when hunting mbogo in the bush, there's never time to pick up your empies anyway! [Wink]

George
 
Posts: 14623 | Location: San Antonio, TX | Registered: 22 May 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by GeorgeS:
Bitch, bitch, bitch! [Big Grin] Honestly, Henry, just practice the way you want and don't worry about the cases!

You know, when hunting mbogo in the bush, there's never time to pick up your empies anyway! [Wink]

George

 
Posts: 3691 | Location: West Virginia | Registered: 23 May 2001Reply With Quote
<JBelk>
posted
HenryC470---

Isn't that the CRF Winchester?? If so, all you have to do is alter the angle on the ejector.

I suspect they're crushing on something other than the rifle ...... unless that rifle has a 30-06 ejector in it. The case mouth shouldn't touch anything on the rifle at any time.
 
Reply With Quote
<JBelk>
posted
HenryC470---

Isn't that the CRF Winchester?? If so, all you have to do is alter the angle on the ejector.

I suspect they're crushing on something other than the rifle ...... unless that rifle has a 30-06 ejector in it. The case mouth shouldn't touch anything on the rifle at any time and the neck just the chamber.
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
The new 375s do this mostly because the ejector is too long I think although I don't dispute Jack's thinking re. the angle of the ejector. It may also have to do with the way the receiver is cut away at the rear. Anyway, for whatever reason, the case does flip right around and hit the receiver if operated quickly. I don't know if theother long cartridges (like the 300Wby) do this or not because I havn't checked one. Make small changes and test often. Regards, Bill.
 
Posts: 3763 | Location: Elko, B.C. Canada | Registered: 19 June 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by JBelk:
HenryC470---

Isn't that the CRF Winchester?? If so, all you have to do is alter the angle on the ejector.

I suspect they're crushing on something other than the rifle ...... unless that rifle has a 30-06 ejector in it. The case mouth shouldn't touch anything on the rifle at any time and the neck just the chamber.

I am absolutely positive the cases are hitting the outside of the receiver.

I put purple-blue layout dye on the outside of the receiver (on the spot I saw brass marks), and not only does the layout dye come off the receiver when cases are ejected, the dents in the cases have purple-blue layout dye in them.

Yes it's the "CRF" Winchester. Which angle needs to be adjusted? Do I make the top of the ejector's face shorter, or do I incorporate a side-to-side slope? Or am I misunderstanding the angle business?

Right now, the face of the ejector is about flush with the plane of the rear wall of the magazine box. I am guessing that a 30-06 ejector would be so long as to make it difficult to load cartridges in the magazine.

Thanks JBelk

H. C.

George,

[Mad] The baboons can eat my cases when I'm hunting,* but I like to reload them when they have only been used at the range. Are you saying that Winchester is right about this dented case business and that a properly functioning "Classic"
Model 70 is supposed to mess up the brass like this? Nobody told me this before I bought the rifle.

H. C.

*I hate them as much as an aspiring African hunter hates any animal, except cats [Wink] .

[ 08-21-2002, 13:44: Message edited by: HenryC470 ]
 
Posts: 3691 | Location: West Virginia | Registered: 23 May 2001Reply With Quote
Moderator

Picture of Mark
posted Hide Post
A simple half assed solution might be to stick a little piece of adhesive foam where they are hitting and see if that prevents them from getting deformed. I'd be tempted to try some peel-and-stick stuff which you could remove after shooting, and when hunting either put it on or just leave it off.
 
Posts: 7774 | Location: Between 2 rivers, Middle USA | Registered: 19 August 2000Reply With Quote
<JBelk>
posted
HenryC470---

Without seeing and trying the gun I can't say *how* to change the ejector.

I can picture how it could come out of the action and flip 180 degrees and ding the neck......it seems like it wouldn't take much change to stop that....it doesn't on a 45 auto.

The older M-70 H&H actions had a severe bevel on the inner-right bridge surface. That transferred the pivot point of the ejecting brass outward. I don't have a new one here to compare it to, though.
 
Reply With Quote
Moderator
posted Hide Post
Henry,

I'll check my M-70 .375 tonight. I don't remember ever having a problem with the case mouths, and I practice the same way you do.

Whose brass are you using?

George
P.S. There is nothing wrong with hating baboons or cats! It's what you do about it that matters [Wink]
 
Posts: 14623 | Location: San Antonio, TX | Registered: 22 May 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by GeorgeS:
Henry,

I'll check my M-70 .375 tonight. I don't remember ever having a problem with the case mouths, and I practice the same way you do.

Whose brass are you using?

George
P.S. There is nothing wrong with hating baboons or cats! It's what you do about it that matters [Wink]

Remington. I've got a case of 270 grain soft point factory loads, 350-odd unfired cases and 50-odd once-fired handloaded cases (got carried away an ordered 200 unfired cases twice). Now I suppose I'll get no sympathy for damaged brass.

H. C.

I can't do much about baboons where I live. Making those bow-season feral cat kabobs takes the edge off though.

[ 08-22-2002, 16:28: Message edited by: HenryC470 ]
 
Posts: 3691 | Location: West Virginia | Registered: 23 May 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
A friend has one of these and it does the same thing -- I don't know if he's gotten it worked on or not by now.
 
Posts: 1246 | Location: Northern Virginia, USA | Registered: 02 June 2001Reply With Quote
<David>
posted
I've got M70 Classic Safari Express in 416 Rem. Basically the same rifle and it does the same thing. When the bolt is cycled quickly, the case mouths hit the rear bridge just below the point where it flattens out for the scope base. I can see the where some brass scuffs off onto receiver.
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I also have the Safri Express Classic in 416 and do not have that problem. My Whitworth mauser in 375 h&h however has the identical problem. Sometimes closing the case mouth half shut. It doesn't bother me much though because it feeds reliably and ejects the shells well out of the way.
 
Posts: 740 | Location: CT/AZ USA | Registered: 14 February 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I gathered that you did not mind the brass damage while hunting, just while practicing. I find that I can control the speed/force of the ejection by slowing down my operation of the bolt. If shooting from a bench, I'll even stop it with my left hand so that it is not ejected. Ku-dude
 
Posts: 959 | Registered: 27 February 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
This doesn't help the .375 question but I was brought up to believe the most important thing in any shot was NOT did I hit him....but WHERE is my case? (True story) Thus it followed that very few of my cases in life ever touch the ground. I just eject into my left hand automatically Don't even think about it.

Obviously I'm not a Cape Buffalo hunter. [Big Grin] Otherwise I might take reloading a bit more seriously.

I'd like to tell everyone that one shot is all I EVER need [Cool] ...but that would be a crock I'd never live down. [Roll Eyes]
 
Posts: 19677 | Location: New Mexico | Registered: 23 May 2002Reply With Quote
Moderator
posted Hide Post
Henry,

I tested the ejection on my 1997-vintage M-70 .375. I could not get it to hit the receiver no matter how hard I worked the bolt. It must just be some slight difference in geometry.

George
 
Posts: 14623 | Location: San Antonio, TX | Registered: 22 May 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Well, the rifle has been to my gunsmith to take out the factory hot glue bedding job and put in glass and pillars. (Do M70's ever melt in the hot African sun?)

I also had him shorten the ejector. He ground off material until the ejector is nearly flush with the bolt face, and the cases still strike the back outer edge of the rear receiver bridge. The ejector is now too short, and the bolt must be slammed to the rear to get a case to eject. I ordered another ejector from Winchester (they sent me an extractor instead [Roll Eyes] ), and I will play with grinding the angle when I get the new ejector. I've done some geometric calculations, and I think I know what angle to try.

Curiously, the new extractor Winchester sent me, with the ground-down ejector, makes the brass hit a different spot (middle of the outer face of rear receiver bridge). I'll try combination of the factory-length ejector and new extractor before I do any grinding. Are these ejectors stainless? The one I just got is "in the white", but the one that came on my rifle is Teflon-coated rather than blued.

JBelk:

I think I understand what you mean about a 30-06 length ejector. With the shorter case, the bolt doesn't come so far back, so the ejector needs to be a litle longer to hit the case head, right?

How far should a (CRF) M70 ejector protrude from the bolt face?

Thanks,

H. C.
 
Posts: 3691 | Location: West Virginia | Registered: 23 May 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Henry, After reading your post I thought hmmmmmm. So I got out my Reminton 700 in .270 and tried slamming the bolt back to eject a fired case and it does the same thing. It does it about half the time and it also hits the rear of the receiver and dents the case mouth.

Just thought you might like to know it's not just Winchesters that do that.
 
Posts: 65 | Location: Upstate New York | Registered: 06 October 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Nitroman
posted Hide Post
Henry,
Sounds like a lot of trouble. I too would just get a small black piece of the fuzzy hook and loop fastener fabric and glue it to the outside of the receiver. Would make it quiet too. You can then tell people your rifle so forcefully ejects it smashes the cases, good for cool factor.
 
Posts: 1844 | Location: Southwest Alaska | Registered: 28 February 2001Reply With Quote
<Rod@MRC>
posted
It's not just the ejector that must be changed but also the bolt stop, which has a shorter arm in long magnum rifles. The shorter arm engages the gas block at the rear of bolt travel.

If you change the ejector length without changing the the bolt stop - no ejection.

Since the extractor acts like a fulcrum on one side of the case and the ejector on the other, there must be a relationship between the two and the arc the case follows when leaving the port. It is certainly hard to visualize imparting enough spin to the case such that it's mouth dings the rear bridge upon leaving the port.
 
Reply With Quote
<Buliwyf>
posted
Henry,

I have tested my M70 416 Safari Express and do not have the problem. In my rifle a hard rack of the bolt kicks the case out about 90 degrees to the ejection port.

Let me know if I can take any measurements for you.

B
 
Reply With Quote
<JBelk>
posted
I'm with Rod.......I can't visualize a case turning 180 degrees before it gets more than two and a half inches from the bridge.

I'm guessing the ejector is WAY too long. It should stick out a M-70 bolt face about .100. A M-98 is even with the guide lug at the full back position.

Turkeyshooter--

A M-700 ejects the same no matter how fast the bolt moves. It's a plunger.
 
Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Buliwyf:
Henry,

I have tested my M70 416 Safari Express and do not have the problem. In my rifle a hard rack of the bolt kicks the case out about 90 degrees to the ejection port.

Let me know if I can take any measurements for you.

B

B-

If you could measure how far the ejector protrudes from the bolt face (with the bolt all the way to the rear), that would be great.

H. C.
 
Posts: 3691 | Location: West Virginia | Registered: 23 May 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Roger Rothschild:
Henry,
Sounds like a lot of trouble. I too would just get a small black piece of the fuzzy hook and loop fastener fabric and glue it to the outside of the receiver. Would make it quiet too. You can then tell people your rifle so forcefully ejects it smashes the cases, good for cool factor.

RR-

I bet that would look just great. There are several people here with the same problem, and I'd love to see the picures of the first guy's rifle that has had this treatment.

Hey, you know... I could put the non-fuzzy (male Velcro) hook and loop stuff on the outside of the cases, and instead of throwing them in the grass when they eject, they'd be right there stuck to the side of the rifle. That would be beyond cool.

No, wait, there's a problem with that. The velcro would get full of corn cob media every time I tumble the cases, and that would just be a nightmare to clean out. Oh well, back to the old drawing board.

H. C.

Actually, I can explain my calculations with a diagram anyone here can draw (because I don't know how to post pictures). This is for a right-handed rifle. Imagine the case head, viewed from behind, as a circle. When the case is thrown free of the rifle, there are two points of contact between the empty case and the rifle: one on the ejector and one on the extractor.

The point of contact between the case head and the ejector can be represented as a dot at 6:00, a little above the bottom of the circle (because the ejector reaches vertically above the bottom of the case head, and if the case is tilting upward, it is touching the top edge of the ejector).

The point of contact between the case head and the extractor is at about 3:00. You can verify this by holding the bolt with the ejector slot at 6:00 and a case under the rim. If you use a narrow punch (in the ejector slot) to push the case forward from the bolt face, you'll see that the case tilts away so it is only touching at the bottom part of the circular portion of the extractor claw that surrounds the case. This part is at about 3:00 when the ejector slot is at about 6:00.

From the time the case starts to tip away from the bolt face, the point at which the case head contacts the extractor moves in an arc around the stationary point at which the case contacts the ejector. This arc is in a plane containing the two points of contact. The plane can be represented by drawing a line on your diagram through the high 6:00 dot for the ejector and the 3:00 dot for the extractor.

If a slight bevel (these ejectors are cheap, don't worry) is ground on the top edge of the ejector, the point of contact between the case head and the ejector is still at 6:00, but it is slightly lower. If you draw another dot on the diagram just below the high 6:00 dot representing the point of contact on a factory ejector, and if you then draw another line through the new ejector contact point and the 3:00 extractor contact point, it is easy to see that the case will be thrown in a more upward arc out of the ejection port. It should not take much grinding (it had better not!) to make the case miss the rear receiver bridge, because the path the case mouth has to take will be longer than it is currently.

The 3:00 extractor contact point (which should not change) and the near horizontal arc the cases have to execute to whack the receiver where they're whacking it means the case mouths are taking the shortest arc possible (around the outer edge of the bolt face to the outer edge of the receiver). It the new, lower ejector contact point directs the cases slighly toward the top of the receiver instead, the path from the outer edge of the bolt face will be just a little longer, and the case ought to miss the receiver entirely.

I'll probably file a slight radius to begin with, changing that to a bevel if the radius is no good. Then I'll do something very drastic to the ejector before I install a new factory ejector and a smiley face puffy sticker on the receiver, and then I'll report back.

[ 12-04-2002, 07:19: Message edited by: HenryC470 ]
 
Posts: 3691 | Location: West Virginia | Registered: 23 May 2001Reply With Quote
<JBelk>
posted
HenryC470--

The ejector is actually at 7:00, but the process you describe is correct.

The best fix for an over aggresive ejection, which is the only thing I can think of, would be to slow down the bolt. The shooter here says he doesn't want to do that. (I haven't had a case hit the ground in 20 years.)

....... So we have to slow the *action* down but keep the bolt speed and energy the same.

The first step would be to limit the amount of time the ejector had to act on the case. Cut it shorter. I've got three pre-64s here. They are all .100 + or - .010 from the bolt face.

The second thing to do would be to reduce the amount of leverage. That's easy, as you said. Just cut an angle on the face of the ejector to move the contact with the case head as far OUT towards the rim as possible.

While you're rooting around in there, take out the bolt stop. If the end is flared you're too rough on the bolt. Slow it down and the problem will be solved. [Smile]
 
Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Yeah, I was using "about 6:00", because I don't have the rifle in my hands, and once I started trying to figure out where the ejector would be on a right handed rifle (5:00 or 7:00?), I got confused.

I'm going to go ahead and measure my own ejector protrusion, but I'm pretty sure it's ground down too short now, because cases don't eject at all if the bolt is worked slowly. There is a range of speeds in which ejection takes place without damaging cases, but it's about the same as when the ejector was ~0.080" longer than it is now.

I'll keep an eye on the bolt stop. I've owned the rifle since about March, but it's been in the shop or in transit almost all of that time. I haven't had lots of time to bash the bolt stop, but Colonel Cooper has advised me to always work the bolt very vigorously and forcefully.

An outdoor-writer friend of mine says I should ask Winchester for some substantial compensation for my all troubles. Does anyone here know about what the distributor price is for a Classic Safari Express M-70? Is Winchester just going to laugh at me for asking? I wouldn't mind building a 458 Lott out of one of these (in spite of recent and ongoing experience). Winchester only sells the LH Safaris in 375 H&H.

H. C.
 
Posts: 3691 | Location: West Virginia | Registered: 23 May 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Nitroman
posted Hide Post
Henry,

Oh well...(scuff my feet on the floor) it works on my FN-FAL...
 
Posts: 1844 | Location: Southwest Alaska | Registered: 28 February 2001Reply With Quote
<JBelk>
posted
HenryC470--

"Colonel Cooper says" ......What's up with that?

A fixed ejector gun ONLY ejects the shell if the bolt comes back against the ejector....Period. You work the bolt like YOU want to. That's why they're made that way. You don't *have* to do anything.

As I said, I haven't had a case hit the ground on purpose in 30 years, but the rifles I shoot are capable of ejection if I want them to. (I remove the plunger ejectors from all my push feed rifles and stop the bolt before ejection on the CFRs)

Winchester owes you nothing. The ejector works just fine. If you want to alter the way it works, that's up to you, not Winchester.
 
Reply With Quote
<Buliwyf>
posted
Henry,

The ejector in my M70 416 Safari Express protrudes .100 from the bolt face with the bolt all the way to the rear.

B

[ 12-05-2002, 03:16: Message edited by: Buliwyf ]
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I been waiting for this to come up! You know the Peanuts commic strip? Charles is going to kick the football and Lucy jerks it away just as he is into the kick. Now change the drill. Lucy doesn"t press the pointy end tight to the ground. Ball doesn't get much velocity OR direction.
The ctg must be gripped under some tension to get the brass kicked out properly. Winchester uses a larger diameter extraction cannelure on ther Magnum cases. Remingtons are smaller in diameter. Cases I just looked at, probably 15 years old the difference is about .006" When you set up a 70 Win extractor to properly hang on to the case so that the ejector can do its thing -PROPERLY- there will be a difference of about .004 to.006" in a micrometer measurement from the L.H. lug to the same point on the extractor(opposite) -being greater with the case on bolt face under the extractor hook versus the measurement taken with empty bolt face. When you try this you will readily see the difference between the Rem and Win cases and the Norma's will be different again but closer to Rem. This makes it interesting for we custom gun smashers because if you must outfit the safari special to handle mixed brass you will also have feed problems to solve. An Extractor with enough spring tension to handle the Rem case( only just) may make it difficult to close over a ctg dropped (in a Hurry) into the chamber if at all and in feeding up out of that damned bent tin box the extractor may not allow the ctg to jump up into bolt face any where near the first 3d of forward bolt travel relying in stead on the receiver at top of bullet ramp to complete the job. This is a scary thing for some rifle operators because they start picturing a bunch of cow elephants standing ther watching you, spotting the hitch in feeding, bellowing (Translation) Yo! Girls we got us a pilgrim! followed by you looking like one of those car bodies at the crusher site your local land fill. Having to juggle all of those things into the mix is what makes the custom safari type rifles so damned expensive. Theory be damned it still ends up cut and try. After the smith has cranked out varied and diverse rifles he tends to appreciate those two prongs on the L.H> bolt lug side of the 98 Mauser. They were put there to aid in ejection back when it was more difficult to control dimensions in the old days of ctg. making.
What to do? quit screwing with the ejector ,get the extractor tensioned to properly hang on to the cases of your choice Remington. Stick with them and... In Nomine Patris et filiis et Spiritui Sanctis, Go in peace my son!
In all seriousness........Tom Burgess
 
Posts: 199 | Location: Kalispell MT. | Registered: 01 November 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by JBelk:
...Winchester owes you nothing. The ejector works just fine. If you want to alter the way it works, that's up to you, not Winchester.

The ejector on this rifle is the least of the problems I've had with it. I paid for the rifle over a year ago, and I am still working the bugs out of the lemon replacement they gave me after I returned the lemon original, and after they worked on the lemon replacement and after my gunsmith fixed most of the remaining problems on the lemon replacement. I think Winchester would like for me to be able to say something nice about them.

quote:
Originally posted by JBelk:
......"Colonel Cooper says" ......What's up with that?

Jeff Cooper, the guy who founded Gunsite, teaches a rifle course and instructs students to work the bolt forcefully at all times. That way, the student will be working the bolt hard enough, should he encounter sticky extraction in a stressful situation. It's a "practice the way you fight, fight the way you practice" sort of philosophy that I don't follow 100% of the time.

I do make it a habit to eject the empty case and chamber another round immediately after I shoot and before (or while) I start to confirm where my shot went. I stand in the grass to limit case dents when I can.

H. C.

(added in an edit)

To clarify things, I'm not really smacking the bolt stop all that hard. My hand knows about where the bolt stop is, and I'm really just trying to get the bolt cycled quickly. I make sure I feel the contact with the bolt stop (so I don't short-stroke), but it's not a hard, jarring contact that moves the sights off target.

[ 12-06-2002, 05:18: Message edited by: HenryC470 ]
 
Posts: 3691 | Location: West Virginia | Registered: 23 May 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Well, I measured it, and my ground-down ejector only protrudes 0.048" from the bolt face. I am pretty sure this is too short. The case is still held in place by the extractor if the bolt is pulled all the way to the rear slowly.

The good news is that with a little filing and sanding (on this too-short ejector), I've finally got the rifle ejecting cases without any dents in them [Smile] [Smile]

I beveled the top edge and corners of the ejector with a file, and then I shoe-shined the bevel to a radius with 400 grit sand paper.

I guess the real test will be whether this treatment works on the new factory ejector Winchester is supposed to be sending me.

I am anything but discouraged at this moment.

H. C.
 
Posts: 3691 | Location: West Virginia | Registered: 23 May 2001Reply With Quote
<Rod@MRC>
posted
Tom Burgess:

Welcome neighbor. It is great to see you here.
 
Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Guns, Politics, Gunsmithing & Reloading  Hop To Forums  Gunsmithing    Please Help! M70 &quot;Classic&quot; Ejection Problem

Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia