The Accurate Reloading Forums
358 Win to 350 Rem mag

This topic can be found at:
https://forums.accuratereloading.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/9411043/m/269100441

19 July 2004, 16:56
Dr. Lou
358 Win to 350 Rem mag
How much would I have to open the feed rails to accommodate the 350 mag? Is it worth the effort? It actually works well as a 358, but I am board and curious. Lou
19 July 2004, 17:32
<9.3x62>
What kind of rifle is it?

I love the 358 and am looking to build another one - I'd leave it, especially if it works well. If you're bored (I know the feeling), score a used action and start a new project. JMO...
19 July 2004, 18:02
Dr. Lou
Sorry, I forgot that little detail. It's a Sako AII action. I know I will have to open the bolt face and the feed rails, but I am not sure if it's worth the risk. If it can be done as a matter of routine, then I may consider it. Nothing wrong with the 358 it's one of my favorite rounds. I am always looking to screw with something, just because. Lou
20 July 2004, 00:56
<eldeguello>
I would not think the slight increase in MV you get would be worth the effort. But if it will relieve your boredom, why not? I'm sure that SAKO action can be made to feed the .350 R. mag. pretty well. You COULD get a couple of .350 rounds and try feeding them from the magazine to see how much metal needs to be removed from the action rails.
20 July 2004, 01:12
jeffeosso
Lou,
man, as a 358 lover, let me give you my STRONG advice.
1: the MOST you will pick up is 250 fps
2: it should cost you 200-300 bucks to have it done, the high end is if he has to reblue and/or buy the reamer
3: while not scarce, 350 rem isn't all over the place
4: ODDS ON, it will not feed as well as it does right now.

Now, if you found another one to make a matched pair out of...

jeffe
20 July 2004, 07:28
Savage99
How heavy is the Sako now and in particular the barrel? When I think of the 358 Win it's with light barrels and the rifles carry so well.

A friend had a couple of custom 358 Wins for sale. Both of them had heavy barrels. They seemed out of context for me.

To think about it his rifles would be more interesting in a more powerful cartridge as the weight would be an advantage.

In general if it is not broken then don't fix it.
20 July 2004, 09:24
Stonecreek
Dr. Lou: I would suggest building a .35-284 Wildcat as an alternative. You wouldn't have to alter the bolt face, the beltless case would require just a little milling of the feed rails, and the ballistic performance would be virtually identical since the two cases are within a grain or so of the same capacity. I know that the .284 case will work in the L579 because Browning used to build a .284 Safari on that action (I had one until a collector offered me more money than it was worth.)
20 July 2004, 18:43
Bill Leeper
I would not convert a Sako to the 350. Even with 284 based cartridges the removal of metal at the bottom of the locking lug raceways can cause problems. This is not speculation, I've seen it often even on factory built rifles in 284. Also, the small diameter bolt of the Sako short action would not lend itself well to opening to the magnum boltface. Regards, Bill.
21 July 2004, 03:24
Dr. Lou
Thanks all for the advice. It will stay a 358 Winnie. I will find something else to do. Lou
21 July 2004, 06:18
Paul H
As a 35 fan, I'd say get a 358 STA built If you really want a faster 35, then go fast.
21 July 2004, 09:41
Dr. Lou
Paul, my next magnum will either be a 358 Norma or the STA.