I see many rifles with regular (chrome moly?) receivers with stainless barrels (e.g. Kimber varmit rifles, some Winchesters,...).

Is this done because it is cheaper or is there another reason?

I've heard of galling but don't know what it is.

Is one type preferred over the other relative to function?

Thanks for any info.

David

Great questions. I would also like to know the answers.

I suspect that part of the answer is that Chrome moly actions are the only ones available from certain mfgs. Further, they are more widely available and cheaper to obtain. Moreover, I did read about supposed galling problems with SS, though I never experienced this myself. Finally, stainless steel barrels may just be more popular due to their durability and other properties.

Let's have more experience chyme in here.

When ever I replace a rifle barrel I use stainless even if the action is blued. You end up with a rifle that is more weather resisted. Not as good as a all stainless but better than a all blued one.

just as a point of interest, i don't think i've ever had a stainless gun shoot as well as steel.

Thanks for your responses.

I would prefer all stainless unless there is some other reason that chrome moly functions better with regards to accuracy, reliability, etc.

Does anyone have any more thoughts?

David