THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM GUNSMITHING FORUM


Moderators: jeffeosso
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Post Mauser 1896 Custom Rifles Here
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
Picture of 333_OKH
posted
Just curious. How many of you have either worked on them or have them? This has been mentioned to me many times as an alternative since I profess not to use anything stouter than factory Euro loads in my 6.5X55SE.

I have to admit that I have a 1906 made 1896 Swdish Mauser that wins military shoots right out of the box, but the action is the sweetest part of the gun: no bolt wooble, smooth as glass, and just the right size for a 6.5X55SE.

Lets see if you all have anything to show about these?
 
Posts: 3284 | Location: Mountains of Northern California | Registered: 22 November 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of 333_OKH
posted Hide Post
Will try, but these were direct links to the gunsmiths web page. I just clipped his link.
 
Posts: 3284 | Location: Mountains of Northern California | Registered: 22 November 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
 
Posts: 4821 | Location: Idaho/North Mex. | Registered: 12 June 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of 333_OKH
posted Hide Post
What is the opinion of this rifle? I am not concerned on critics of Ed's work, but rather the concept.
 
Posts: 3284 | Location: Mountains of Northern California | Registered: 22 November 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of TC1
posted Hide Post
I like Ed's work, it's the concept I have a problem with. Look at what had to be done to fit the safety. The safety lever almost hits the bolt handle and the back of the handle had to be notched to clear the shroud. Then there is the old stigma of a M96, fair or not, you can stick a small fortune in one of these and it won't have any value just because of what it is. If I wanted a small ring mauser I'd opt for a 1910 or 1936 Mexican, BRNO 21H, a G33/40 or that Peruvian that looks like a 33/40 without the lightening cut's. Others may feel different, but that's my opinion.

Terry


--------------------------------------------

Well, other than that Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?
 
Posts: 6315 | Location: Mississippi | Registered: 18 May 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
It looks nice but just a question.

Why was the Blackburn trigger piece removed and replaced with an original Mauser.
The Blackburn has a nice profile and sits in the rear of the TG bow. ??
Bob
 
Posts: 475 | Registered: 16 December 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of 333_OKH
posted Hide Post
I think the Blackburn bow had to be removed because they used a small ring Mauser box, and only the gaurd needed adjusted, but I am not sure.

I really like these little rifles, but has anyone else used them? No one is stepping up, but in the past I saw rifles on this site?







 
Posts: 3284 | Location: Mountains of Northern California | Registered: 22 November 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I don't think that is Ed's concept. Rather, I think its Jim Wisner's concept. Ask Jim about it.
 
Posts: 7090 | Registered: 11 January 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of ForrestB
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by TC1:
I like Ed's work, it's the concept I have a problem with. Look at what had to be done to fit the safety. The safety lever almost hits the bolt handle and the back of the handle had to be notched to clear the shroud. Then there is the old stigma of a M96, fair or not, you can stick a small fortune in one of these and it won't have any value just because of what it is. If I wanted a small ring mauser I'd opt for a 1910 or 1936 Mexican, BRNO 21H, a G33/40 or that Peruvian that looks like a 33/40 without the lightening cut's. Others may feel different, but that's my opinion.

Terry


thumb This pretty much sums it up.


______________________________
"Truth is the daughter of time."
Francis Bacon
 
Posts: 5053 | Location: Muletown | Registered: 07 September 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of 333_OKH
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by TC1:
I like Ed's work, it's the concept I have a problem with. Look at what had to be done to fit the safety. The safety lever almost hits the bolt handle and the back of the handle had to be notched to clear the shroud. Then there is the old stigma of a M96, fair or not, you can stick a small fortune in one of these and it won't have any value just because of what it is. If I wanted a small ring mauser I'd opt for a 1910 or 1936 Mexican, BRNO 21H, a G33/40 or that Peruvian that looks like a 33/40 without the lightening cut's. Others may feel different, but that's my opinion.

Terry


I hear you load and clear. I just like the little rifles. I will keep mine military for shoots and start the search for a suitable high quality action.
 
Posts: 3284 | Location: Mountains of Northern California | Registered: 22 November 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I've got a 96 mauser barreled action with a Shilen tube that I have been trying to sell, PM if interested...
 
Posts: 89 | Registered: 20 December 2005Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia