08 November 2011, 20:49
uwavewhats old is new again
I thought these 50 cal snipers rifles were something new - Nothing new under the sun I guess!
Found a neat old article worth reading:
Go to page 16
http://www.gunsmagazine.com/1956issues/G1156.pdfThe author was some guy called Elmer.
09 November 2011, 06:37
BobsterThank you so much for the post! It was a treat to read those old articles and ads. I know that took some time for you to scan. If you add inflation, it tells us that we aren't getting such bad deals on milsurps today.
10 November 2011, 01:52
JTEXI wish I could go back and buy some of those rifles..................

10 November 2011, 08:22
Michael RobinsonOff the chart on the cool factor alone.
Many thanks.
10 November 2011, 09:00
Dago RedVery cool! I'm on a small screen right now will read later on the desktop, but it is cool not just because of the article but the old ads. Mexican mausers for 25 bucks, 1917's for 37. but I bet if we did the math that isn't so much dfferent than today, except the supply is really dried up. Can you imagine just buying as many as you wanted? who had the foresight?
Red
10 November 2011, 19:24
WoodhitsThere was also a discussion of that rifle in the December, 1970 "Gun Notes" column.
11 November 2011, 01:04
SmallCalThanks for posting the link, it's a great read. A bolt action, 25 lb 50 BMG with no break, etc. might be a little rough!
Now I see where the ideas for a compass in the stock and plastic stock inlays came from!
Too funny they have someone shooting African Dangerous game with "Deer Rifles". A cape buffalo with a 300 Weatherby, wow.
Two adds that were especially funny were the Canadian firm offering duty free shipping of Ross rifles among others to those of us in the US, but the one that I'd love to have just for the fun of it is the Anti-Tank gun that "only weighs 33 pounds" for $79.99.
11 November 2011, 05:53
kcstottI was thinking the same thing NO Break!! Holy crap thats gotta pack a punch.