15 February 2008, 05:35
KabluewyCharles Daly Mauser Quality???
Under another discussion the following was posted:
quote:
Originally posted by z1r:
I don't like the M48's for building on, they are pretty roughly machined and often out of square by a lot. I had one that measured .003" off just accross the boltface. The only actions I've seen that are worse are the Charles Daly Mausers made coincidentally in the same plant.
I would like to know what others think of the Charles Daly Mausers quality. I have two of the actions, and considering having something built using them. I just want to be sure they are worth the effort and cost, or should I get rid of them.
Thanks,
KB
15 February 2008, 06:13
vapodogI've owned several of them.....One I turned into a .257 Weatherby and two others were turned into .25-06 riflesand I wasn't complaining about any of them.
There were a few minor issues I had to fix and it was irritating as I expected them to be better but in the net result they were well worth the asking price.
I can't get by the Remington offering of the same barreled action as the price went way up and the fit of the wood is atrocious.....screw em!
15 February 2008, 06:18
z1rLet me correct myself here, the bad CD actions I encountered were not actually worse, they were just as bad. Measuring up to .003" off across the boltface.
15 February 2008, 08:47
HerrMesserI picked up a CD rifle in 06 and ended up getting a set of wendage adjustable set of scope rings in order to sight it in, couldn't move far enough to the right.
Rad