19 April 2004, 04:11
bartscheThanks,Courtney,
I guess I was lucky. When I got my 527 it came with a target with three holes in it close together. There are no other sights on it so I figured they had a scope with rings that they proffed every rifle with. Well being fat dumb and happy I mounted the rings and scope ,and from the back yard bore sighted it. The next day I took it to the range and the fist shot was within 2" of center.What indication did you get that the rings were soft? The rings I received were steel but I know not the hardness or what future trouble that they may cause. Do you think the light recoil of the .222 will adversly affect them?

roger
19 April 2004, 07:54
courtney platerIIRC it was the screws that deformed and stripped the hex heads when I tried to loosen them and adjust the rings. I guess the rings themselves may have been ok temper wise but as they did not line up anywhere near the bore centerline so I tossed them. It may just have been a bad set of screws but I've been happy with the Millet rings and have always liked Warne too. I glad everything is working out for you. The experience did not sour me on CZ just their rings. I was able to best the included target at 200 yards yesterday with 55 grain white box Winchester factory loads and 50 grain Hornaday V-max factory reloads doing about 3300fps. It hated the 68 grain A-max though. Maybe 10 inches at 100 and I could see evidence of bullet yaw in the targets. Too long a bullet I guess for the 1-9 twist. I loaded up a 100 Remington 50 grain PLHP rounds and Ball-C and got decent results too. If yours is mounted fine, don't worry, be happy, go shoot.
