THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM GUNSMITHING FORUM

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Guns, Politics, Gunsmithing & Reloading  Hop To Forums  Gunsmithing    removal feed ramp metal (or how much is too much)

Moderators: jeffeosso
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
removal feed ramp metal (or how much is too much)
 Login/Join
 
one of us
Picture of Tim_Ryan
posted
Need a third (and fourth and fifth and ...) opinion here! Picked up a Pre-64 H&H that had previously been rechambered to 300 Wby. Was showing it to a buddy and a gun show carnie (that I dont get along with anyway) butts in and says that I got screwed, the bottom locking lug abutment was garbage because metal had been removed from the locking lug seat. Got into a discussion with him about exactly what he meant and he insisted that metal had been removed making it unsafe. Problem is I could see where some metal had been removed but from the feed ramp itself. I used a bore scope to inspect the seat and it did not look like it had been messed with. Took it to a local smith and he agreed that material had been removed from the feed ramp but did not make it unsafe, just a shame that whoever did it did not know what they were doing as it was unnessisary! Said it was perfectly safe to fire. Here is a pic.


Not sure if it is good enough to tell what you are looking at but you can see material is removed from the edges but the center of the feed ramp still has the factory height. With the action out of the stock you can see that there is minimal clearance between the bolt and the feed ramp, just like on my 375. Gun has obviously been fired quite a bit. Bore is polished fairly smooth, it is bedded into a very nice custom stock. I bought it from a little old man who must have been near 75. He claimed it was his hunting rifle for years but it kicked so much he was having trouble shooting it with his arthritus. So what do you think? Too much material removed to be safe or fire away :-).

Thanks,
Tim


"I want to see you shoot the way you shout"

TR (the original)
 
Posts: 103 | Location: WA | Registered: 15 February 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I will let the true experts answer your safety question, but I also have one of my own:

Did the gun carnie offer to buy it from you after telling you what a POS it was?

Todd
 
Posts: 341 | Location: MI | Registered: 24 January 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Hi Tim,

Glad to here the locking lugs were okay. I was pretty sure when Kim and I looked at it that you would be okay but know knowing it is ggod to go, you got a heck of good action for a great price.

Jeff


"Only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you; Jesus Christ and the American Soldier. One died for your sins, the other for your freedom...."
 
Posts: 426 | Location: Yakima, Washington, USA | Registered: 30 March 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Westpac
posted Hide Post
The problem is, whenever you remove material from the feed ramp, you are reducing the thickness of the lug seat which can compromise the safety of the action. That said, I can't tell from the photo whether it's safe or not, and I wouldn't consider any advise given, based solely on a photo, to be too credible. I would recommend letting a competent gunsmith take a look. Maybe even two. Good luck.

FWIW, gunshows are a great place for folks to unload their crap. I know when a gunshow has been to town just by the size of the line forming at the shop door on the Monday following one. Big Grin Gotta be careful! Good luck...


_______________________________________________________________________________
This is my rifle, there are many like it but this one is mine. My rifle is my best friend, it is my life.
 
Posts: 3171 | Location: SLC, Utah | Registered: 23 February 2007Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Tim_Ryan
posted Hide Post
Gun carnie did not offer to buy it but suggested parting it out. I kinda felt he was leading up to that but I headed him off by telling him I had the tools to tear it down and part it out if it needed it. He did say that he and a couple of others had looked at it during set up but passed on it.

Jeff, Thanks for the kind words. I think it is ok too but still a little aprehensive (sp)!

Westpac, I agree it is hard to diagnose from a picture. I have had one qualified smith look at it (he has been doing this for many years and has a good local reputation) but there are no others in the area that I know of. Would love to have 2 or 3 more qualified smiths look at it hands on but not really possible without sending it out.

Thanks,

Tim


"I want to see you shoot the way you shout"

TR (the original)
 
Posts: 103 | Location: WA | Registered: 15 February 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
That looks like a fairly typical 300H&H M70 action to me. When Winchester lengthened the M70 to take the 300 H&H, that is how they did it. They opened it to the front. You had the experience of having someone who knew nothing prove it to you by speaking right up. Regards, Bill.
 
Posts: 3763 | Location: Elko, B.C. Canada | Registered: 19 June 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Bill,

Not neccesarily disagreeing with what you say. I agree that the M70 Long Mags were opened up as you say, but the conversion to the Weatherby factory ammo sometimes caused the ramp to be reduced and the mag box lengthened. Don't have the specs in fromt of me but I think the W'by was a bit longer.

I had a 300 mag m70 in the shop that had been converted to the W'by. One look at it and I told the owner to drive out into the middle of the lake and drop it in. The entire lower lug had been ground down along with the underside of the action up to and including part of the front guard screw hole. There was only the top lug left to bear in the action.


Jim Kobe
10841 Oxborough Ave So
Bloomington MN 55437
952.884.6031
Professional member American Custom Gunmakers Guild

 
Posts: 5521 | Location: Minnesota | Registered: 10 July 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Tim_Ryan
posted Hide Post
Thanks for all the replys guys. The two people that I feel were truely qualified who looked at it agreed that it would be OK. Took it out yesterday and put 10 rounds through it, didn't blow up! Strangly enough it looks to be the most accurate mdl 70 I have had, shooting around 1/2", go figure!

Thanks again,
Tim


"I want to see you shoot the way you shout"

TR (the original)
 
Posts: 103 | Location: WA | Registered: 15 February 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I think this one definitely qualifies! This action came into my shop already barreled up as a .375 Ruger. The other guy who did the barrel work tried to get it to feed, and it ended up like this. Needless to say, it got another action. Josh and I cut it open so we could see what was left of the bottom lug and also to keep anybody from using it. Here are some pictures.












 
Posts: 51 | Location: canyon lake,texas | Registered: 29 September 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Fjold
posted Hide Post
Great pictures, thanks Tip


Frank



"I don't know what there is about buffalo that frightens me so.....He looks like he hates you personally. He looks like you owe him money."
- Robert Ruark, Horn of the Hunter, 1953

NRA Life, SAF Life, CRPA Life, DRSS lite

 
Posts: 12695 | Location: Kentucky, USA | Registered: 30 December 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Nice photos.
 
Posts: 9207 | Registered: 22 November 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Dear Mr. Burns:

It breaks my heart to see an 1898 Mauser ruined like that, not to mention the insanity of putting something unsafe into a customer's hands. You did the right thing by destroying it, and taking it out of circulation.

Sincerely,

Chris Bemis
 
Posts: 2594 | Location: Pennsylvania | Registered: 30 July 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Tim_Ryan
posted Hide Post
Mr Burns,

Great photos, thanks for adding them to this thread. Thank goodness my mdl 70 is not cut anywhere near that much.

Tim


"I want to see you shoot the way you shout"

TR (the original)
 
Posts: 103 | Location: WA | Registered: 15 February 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I was inspecting some ZastavaM98 actions recently,that had been factory modified to accept .375H&H.
They had notably less ramp than on the cutup M98 posted by TipBurns(about 1/2-2/3rds of what you see). I mentioned my concerns about the big cut out, dealer said, they are made of modern steels and had all been proofed from the factory. Still, I DiDnot like it at all.
Pitty I didnt have a camera, I think what you would have seen, would have made many here nervous Eeker about using one.
Then on the other hand, premium companies like WaffenJung, seem to remove a fair amount of metal from std.m98 for rem.416, Im sure they know what their doing!...Its just that I need a little more reassurance/convincing!!!
Its really the last place I would like to begin removing metal from any action.
The feed ramps on New Kurz actions from H&W and GMA, are somewhat shorter than on their magnum mauser bigbrothers. Keep in mind, those Kurz are used for high Psi WSM cartridges.
 
Posts: 2134 | Registered: 12 May 2005Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Guns, Politics, Gunsmithing & Reloading  Hop To Forums  Gunsmithing    removal feed ramp metal (or how much is too much)

Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia