Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
one of us |
I wasn't sure which forum to post this in, but thought I'd give this one a try. My cousin has a Winchester model 70 and we were going to order Leupold dual dovetail bases for it tonight but he isn't sure if it's pre-64 or not. Does anybody know how to tell the difference? On the barrel it says model 70 XTR, and in a book I have it shows the XTR being made from 1978 on, but for some reason my cousin seems to think it's a pre-64. If the serial number will help, it is G1387xxx. If anybody can help with this, I'd really appreciate it! | ||
|
one of us |
The prefix "G" in the serial number was only used on post-64 guns, and is still in use. It is certainly a post-64. | |||
|
One of Us |
XTR is a push feed, post 64. | |||
|
Moderator |
the difference between pre and post 64 model 70? the SAME difference between SUCK and DOESN'T SUCK With the exception of the "classic" action (return to pre-64 kinda) every post 64 is a push feed. Easist way to tell... take the bolt out of the gun. turn it a full 360 degree turn along the long axis (like you are working the bolt) if there's not a strip of springy metal (extractor) running just about the full length of the bolt, it's post 64. XTR model is post 64. what happened was the bean counters determined that their competition was remington, and the remington was cheaper to make. the pre64 required quite a bit more time and fitting, which costs more to produce. They came up with several "improvements" and like most improvements from bean counters, it SUCKED. The Controled round feeding, a la mauser, was replaced with a shoving action, copied from the the remington, to a degree... the gas handling may or maynot have been improved then, it certainly is on the classic, net effect, the best mass produced american made action downgraded themselves to the next CHEAPEST action, without regard to quaility... and for 30 years, the winchester name just meant another pushfeed bolt action rifle jeffe | |||
|
one of us |
Wow..thanks so much. You guys really know your stuff. I was aware the pre-64's are somehow better than the post-64 guns, but I wasn't quite sure why. I think I will just tell my cousin it's post-64, and leave out the part about how it really sucks! | |||
|
one of us |
There are some good things about the post 64 action and they are favored by target shooters in my area. I was here when the pre/post 64 debacle happened and I did not buy another Winchester product for decades. Winchester cheapened their other guns as well at that time. | |||
|
One of Us |
I don't happen to feel that they suck, they just don't have some of the better features of the pre 64 and "new" pre 64 models. | |||
|
One of Us |
I've owned pre-64s and post 64s and classics as well.....all of them fine guns IMO.....However there's a lot of folks that demand the CRF feature on their DG rifles.....The best feature is the three position safety which has always been on the M-70. I've never had any trouble with push feed guns either but then I haven't taken one after dangerous game. When you have a feeding failure hunting deer the consequences seem trivialized compared to a failure to feed while shooting at a wounded cape buffalo. | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia