Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
one of us |
Need a .500" high weaver scope base, what number would that be? If there is one? Fred M. zermel@shaw.ca | ||
|
One of Us |
For what gun? You might be stuck with having to purchase the base material and machine it yourself. | |||
|
one of us |
Malm. I have a Win. low wall with Leupold bases. The front base is the cam-in type very difficult to remove. The back is opposing screws. You cant twist the ring out without bending the scope. I made a wrench to slip under the scope. I hate that mount, I like to get something to slide off like the Burris Z-rings or something simular. I have a Weaver rear base that fits on the action. A .500" front base would need a little fiting and new screwe holes. There is a blank Weaver base at .650 at Brownell lots of milling. Some of the Grand Slam bases look pretty high. Fred M. zermel@shaw.ca | |||
|
one of us |
If you can't find the base you want rings are made in various heights. Join the NRA | |||
|
One of Us |
I would contact the technical department at Brownells, or, Weaver directly at 1-800-635-7656 and ask them which grand slam base would fit and how high it is. I always keep stock material on hand just for such an occasion. Good luck! | |||
|
One of Us |
Leupold dovetail rings are meant to be installed in the base before you mount the scope. If they are loose enough to turn out without bending the scope, they aren't a good fit. Weaver bases come in various contours so it will be hit or miss to find one unless they have a set specificly for your action. You can always trim blank stock or a oversized base down with a flycutter reletively fast though. -Don | |||
|
one of us |
Thanks all of you. Perhaps Brownell has someting that will be big enough for fitting. Or else I make one from the solid rail. The oposing screws are no good either because they also bent the scope if you use them for a lot of windage adjust ments. Wonderiung how many people bent their scopes with these moumts. It was the only set of mounts I could find for this rifle. Whished I never saw them. Fred M. zermel@shaw.ca | |||
|
One of Us |
I'd say, "nobody" but I'd have been wrong.... what you are supposed to do is to install the front ring and work it back and forth a few times to "settle" the rings and base together. then install the rear ring, and THEN install the scope. I usually use a 16" piece of 1" diameter round stock to"work in" and align the rings before scope installation... your problem with the leupold style base I must sadly file under "operator malfunction". AllanD If I provoke you into thinking then I've done my good deed for the day! Those who manage to provoke themselves into other activities have only themselves to blame. *We Band of 45-70er's* 35 year Life Member of the NRA NRA Life Member since 1984 | |||
|
one of us |
Allan DeGroot. You can file it under whatever category you want, but I have done it exactly as you describe it. The front ring is still tighter then the hubs of hell. I even applied STP and moly paste. If I crank them any more back and forth they will be loose. You can have them real cheap, how about 1/2 price, since you know how to install them and I don't. Fred M. zermel@shaw.ca | |||
|
one of us |
They are Redfield jr. style,Leupolds are only copies.Too loose,too tight,windages screws getting loose. You can hunt longer with the wind at your back | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia