THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM GUNSMITHING FORUM

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Guns, Politics, Gunsmithing & Reloading  Hop To Forums  Gunsmithing    Confused about front sight height /Lyman 48 sight

Moderators: jeffeosso
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Confused about front sight height /Lyman 48 sight
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted
I see very often pics of Mauser rifles (unaltered) with a Lyman 48 peep sight mounted in combination with the normal dimensioned Mauser original front sight ramp and a more ore less standard dimensioned front sight.

Whereas the G&H rifles for example have considerably higher front sight ramps (what seems to be logical for me).

Even the highest front side blades actually available attached to the standard ramp are not high enough to meet the point of impact even in the lowest position of the peep.
Am I wrong?
Any elegant solution if a Lyman should be mounted ?
 
Posts: 230 | Location: Germany | Registered: 02 December 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
You may have been seeing G&H rifles built on the 1903 Springfield action, or at least the tall front ramps intended for use with the 1903. The 1903's awkwardly-tall rear bridge means that its Lyman 48 sight is made taller than their model for the Mauser, and so requires a taller front sight. I imagine that G&H used the same ramps on most of their rifles simply for convenience and economy, and so that may be the reason.

IMO normally a usual-US-height ramp front will be OK on a Mauser with a 48, for instance I think the NECG front sight is fine with a Mauser while in my (limited) experience it is usually somewhat short for a 1903.
Regards, Joe


__________________________
You can lead a human to logic but you can't make him think.
NRA Life since 1976. God bless America!
 
Posts: 2756 | Location: deep South | Registered: 09 December 2008Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of wildcat junkie
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by heavenknows:
I see very often pics of Mauser rifles (unaltered) with a Lyman 48 peep sight mounted in combination with the normal dimensioned Mauser original front sight ramp and a more ore less standard dimensioned front sight.

Whereas the G&H rifles for example have considerably higher front sight ramps (what seems to be logical for me).

Even the highest front side blades actually available attached to the standard ramp are not high enough to meet the point of impact even in the lowest position of the peep.
Am I wrong?
Any elegant solution if a Lyman should be mounted ?


I had a 48 Foolproof on a 98K. I had to put a considerably higher front sight on it.

I used a Williams "Firesight" front bead made for .22 rifle replacement.

The dovetail is just a bit larger than the GI Mauser sight.

You can find links & other info HERE.

If a "Firesight" is not your cup of tea. You can use the sight hieght info on that thread to find the proper "iron" front sight.


GOOGLE HOTLINK FIX FOR BLOCKED PHOTOBUCKET IMAGES https://chrome.google.com/webs...inkfix=1516144253810
 
Posts: 2440 | Location: Northern New York, WAY NORTH | Registered: 04 March 2001Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Guns, Politics, Gunsmithing & Reloading  Hop To Forums  Gunsmithing    Confused about front sight height /Lyman 48 sight

Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia