THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM GUNSMITHING FORUM


Moderators: jeffeosso
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
How much rifling?
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted
Gents,

If a 20 inch barrel, only had the last 6 inches rifled, what probems would I be looking at?

Roger QSL
 
Posts: 4428 | Location: Queen Creek , Az. | Registered: 04 July 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Why do you ask, Grasshopper?
If you're experimenting, don't, the barrel makers have already done that for us.
If you have a worn barrel, I can't imagine how it got that way, but a jump of that far before hitting the rifling would have to deform the bullet quite a bit when it did hit, ruining accuracy. It might even cause a pressure spike at the wrong point and you might be looking for gun parts, maybe with a red and white cane.
 
Posts: 619 | Registered: 14 November 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Actually guns were made like that at one time. They were called "Paradox" .
The Idea was that you could shoot either a round ball, or use it as a shotgun.
Greener made these up for hunters in Africa.
To make such a bore you would have to rifle it then ream out the rifling as far as you wanted. Otherwise the rifling would not engrave the bullet.
Sounds like the ultimate in "frebore".
Good luck!
 
Posts: 217 | Location: Michigan | Registered: 20 December 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Gents,

I was curious along the lines of a pressure spike. The reaming sounds plausable.

Just how much rifling does it take to stabalize a slug? Especially, a heavy 458.

Roger QSL
 
Posts: 4428 | Location: Queen Creek , Az. | Registered: 04 July 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Lets look at the difference between a bullet starting from zero revolutionary velocity hitting the leadin to the lands,and the same bullet going 2000 fps straight down a smoothe bore, and then hitting a restriction in the barrel in the form of a spiral set of lands that want to make it go from a forward vector to a spinning vector at 100,000 or 200,000 rpm ):

I fear the rifle would want to twist from your hands, or fly forward, or just generally resist the acceleration from a straight flight into a spinning flight. This would most likely just rip the jacket off the bullet, or separate it from the core. WIth lead bullets sometimes this is just a stripped bullet.

It would be rather bad news all around.

However, this is just based on my understanding of physics, as I have never tried it.

However, try a simple experiment: start running from standing, and then jump off a pickup truck going 10 mph and see how you make the transition.

anyway, have someone take pictures if you try it. They could be entertaining.

[ 10-08-2003, 05:25: Message edited by: Jameister ]
 
Posts: 902 | Location: Denver Colderado | Registered: 13 May 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Sounds like a good way to reduce felt recoil - having the bullet pull the rifle forward when it hits the lands. [Roll Eyes]

In all seriousness, you would have to cut a forcing cone at the beginning of the rifling. Much the same way as a forcing cone is cut into the barrel of a revolver, and for the same reasons.
 
Posts: 2036 | Location: Roebling, NJ 08554 | Registered: 20 January 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Big Bore
posted Hide Post
Sort of apples and oranges, but I have fooled with a 20 ga. shooting slugs through a smooth bore, rifled choke tube, and a rifled barrel. Accuracy through the tube, shooting sabot slugs, was much better than shooting through a smooth bore, but not near as good as shooting through a fully rifled barrel. There was no twisting, or anything else out of the normal when you shot. I also tested Brenekie full bore slugs through the smooth bore, rifled tube, and rifled barrel, giving roughly the same results. By going from a rifled choke tube to a fully rifled bore, I was able to gain another 25 yards of usefull accuracy. While the tube would hold 3" at 50 yards, then shooting patterns after that, the fully rifled bore would hold 3 inch groups out to 75 yards, and "only" opened up to 11 inch groups by 100. Too big to hunt with, but with the rifled tube, after 50 yards the slugs started tumbling and more often than not missed the target completely at 75 yards.
 
Posts: 641 | Location: Indiana, U.S.A. | Registered: 21 October 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Gents,

Well some interesting posts. Didn't quite solve my questions though. Hoping to hear from someone with technical knowledge of barrel rifling.

The response with the long leade aiding with recoil reduction, appeals, but not sure of the science.HI

The old paradox rifling was something that interested me. Slow start with increasing rotation. Seems this should aid in reducing pressure spikes.

Has anyone tested this system. Especially with big heavy slugs?

Thanks for your inputs but still not enlightened as to the original questions.

Roger QSL
 
Posts: 4428 | Location: Queen Creek , Az. | Registered: 04 July 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of 45LCshooter
posted Hide Post
This is just an idea, not advise; but if you were to decide to experiment with this, you may want to start out shooting a fully rifled barrel and add freebore in small increments. If you shoot through a chrony, I would suspect that you would see an increase in velocity with the useful addition of freebore and then a decrease when it begins to lose its utility. This if just off the top of my head. from what I keep hearing about freebore, accuracy will likely errode somewhat through the whole experiment.

If I were to offer advise, I would say to start with very small increments.
 
Posts: 381 | Location: Kiowa, AL | Registered: 08 April 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Paradox rifle/shotguns were fairly accurate out to 75 yds,as they used bullets weighing up to
900 gr in some 10 gauges. The last 3 inches of barrel was rifled.ED.
 
Posts: 27742 | Registered: 03 February 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I had similar experience to Big Bore. I have a 12 gauge smooth bore barrel into which I can put a rifled choke tube. I don't see any difference in recoil or accuracy (using Remington Slugger non-saboted rifled slugs), and I don't feel any twist when I shoot.

H. C.
 
Posts: 3691 | Location: West Virginia | Registered: 23 May 2001Reply With Quote
<eldeguello>
posted
quote:
... but I have fooled with a 20 ga. shooting slugs through a smooth bore, rifled choke tube, and a rifled barrel. Accuracy through the tube, shooting sabot slugs, was much better than shooting through a smooth bore, but not near as good as shooting through a fully rifled barrel. There was no twisting, or anything else out of the normal when you shot. I also tested Brenekie full bore slugs through the smooth bore, rifled tube, and rifled barrel, giving roughly the same results. By going from a rifled choke tube to a fully rifled bore, I was able to gain another 25 yards of usefull accuracy. While the tube would hold 3" at 50 yards, then shooting patterns after that, the fully rifled bore would hold 3 inch groups out to 75 yards, and "only" opened up to 11 inch groups by 100. Too big to hunt with, but with the rifled tube, after 50 yards the slugs started tumbling and more often than not missed the target completely at 75 yards.
I have owned two 12-ga. Ithaca Deerslayers of the original design that would put Remington Foster-type slugs into 3" to 4" groups @ 100 yards with scope sights on them.

In tests of this kind, experimenters have gotten a wide range of results. Some smoothbore guns using a screw-in rifled choke tube produced accuracy as good as that obtained with a barrel rifled the full length. Other guns using the rifled screw-in tube didn't shoot at all well! At one time, (maybe still??) Williams Gunsight Corp. made an aluminum "add-on" rifled tube that clamped over the muzzle of smoothbore shotguns, supposedly to add accuracy to the Foster-type slugs. This was essentially before the advent of most "sabot" type slugs. Results of testing these indicated that they didn't improve accuracy much, if at all!

It seems to me that the "paradox" approach would work better with relatively low-velocity, softer projectiles than it would with a jacketed bullet at high-powered rifle velocities. I suspect that the faster the bullet is moving when it hits the rifling, the longer the rifled section needed to get it to start spinning! But one would have to conduct some experiments to see what would happen. Also, as pointed out above, deformation of the bullet by the rifled portion of the barrel might prevent any kind of accuracy. It would probably cost some dough to find out, and if the results were unacceptable, you'd be stuck with a useless experimental barrel, at least! [Confused]

[ 10-09-2003, 17:31: Message edited by: eldeguello ]
 
Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia