THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM GUNSMITHING FORUM


Moderators: jeffeosso
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
If you like the pre-war classics
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted
I'm trying something new at the invitation of Steven Dodd Hughes.

I've posted some information and pictures at his web site. As we both have time I will expand with questions & answers with articles.

I've posted pictures of a couple dozen of the better known pre-war makers.


http://www.finegunmaking.com/
 
Posts: 808 | Location: Anchorage, Alaska | Registered: 04 January 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Michael,

Thanks for the info! Is there a new book in the making? I sure hope so.


Jim
 
Posts: 1210 | Location: Memphis, TN | Registered: 25 January 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Michael,

Looking at your fine collection of rifles reminds me of a question I have raised with European friends. They seem to think that the 22mm German scopes (Zeiss Zielklein, Hensholdt, etc.) were meant for .22 caliber rifles and not for high power sporting rifles. Noske and Lyman obviously thought otherwise.

I have always preferred the small diameter scope tubes because they don't overwhelm the design of the rifle and don't make a beautifully balanced rifle/stock combination look top heavy.

All of the scoped rifles you display are using the 22mm scopes, although the larger diameter German scopes were clearly avaliable at the time. Do you have any comments?
 
Posts: 1748 | Registered: 27 March 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Thanks Michael Great stuff as always

Michael J


Michael J
 
Posts: 485 | Location: Lakewood Colorado | Registered: 17 February 2008Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Prewar70
posted Hide Post
Mike,

Beautiful stuff there, just amazing. It seems like the custom makers forgot or intentionally dsimissed Winchester's Model 54 action. Springfields, Mausers, and then the model 70s but the 54s are rare. You know way more about it than I do as it's just an observation on my part. Have you had any discussions or research on why the 54 action wasn't in favor?

When you acquire a rifle, do you always refinish or if the overall condition is of a certain level do you leave it as is? I'm not very old, but the older I get the more I appreciate originality and character.

The next time you post pictures throw some good prewar Model 70 actions in there. Maybe a Swift with a 10x Unertl on a G&H stock or the like!
 
Posts: 895 | Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota | Registered: 13 July 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
boy oh boy - michael & steve together, what a great combination
 
Posts: 13466 | Location: faribault mn | Registered: 16 November 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Very Nice collaboration Very Nice indeed . Spectacular examples an pictures !. tu2

salute archer archer
 
Posts: 4485 | Location: Planet Earth | Registered: 17 October 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Prewar70:
Have you had any discussions or research on why the 54 action wasn't in favor?


``````````````````````````````````````````
Stewart Otteson, in the first volume of his work "The Bolt Action" enumerates the weak points of the Model 54:

1. Springfield breech and gas handling.
2. Direct pull trigger
3. Sear bolt stop
4. Two-piece firing pin
5. Steel strap floorplate assembly.
6. Lack of a low-profile bolt and safety.

When you consider these drawbacks, together with the fact that the Model 54 came out in 1925 and the Model 70, which dealt with all of these issues except the first, was on the market in 1936, I would think that the custom gun makers of the time preferred to stick with the 1903 Springfield, rather than switching to the Model 54, since the Springfield shared only three of these weak points.
 
Posts: 1748 | Registered: 27 March 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by xausa:
Michael,

Looking at your fine collection of rifles reminds me of a question I have raised with European friends. They seem to think that the 22mm German scopes (Zeiss Zielklein, Hensholdt, etc.) were meant for .22 caliber rifles and not for high power sporting rifles. Noske and Lyman obviously thought otherwise.

I have always preferred the small diameter scope tubes because they don't overwhelm the design of the rifle and don't make a beautifully balanced rifle/stock combination look top heavy.

All of the scoped rifles you display are using the 22mm scopes, although the larger diameter German scopes were clearly avaliable at the time. Do you have any comments?



Well, Like you said they look better Wink.

These smaller scopes preform well on the 30-06 class of rifle and I've never had or heard of a problem.

I'm not sure how much bearing this has on the subject but most of these early scope were not carried on the rifle but in a belt holster. I've seen many of the holsters and they are all made for the smaller Hensoldt and Zeiss scopes.
 
Posts: 808 | Location: Anchorage, Alaska | Registered: 04 January 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Prewar70:
Mike,

Beautiful stuff there, just amazing. It seems like the custom makers forgot or intentionally dsimissed Winchester's Model 54 action. Springfields, Mausers, and then the model 70s but the 54s are rare. You know way more about it than I do as it's just an observation on my part. Have you had any discussions or research on why the 54 action wasn't in favor?

When you acquire a rifle, do you always refinish or if the overall condition is of a certain level do you leave it as is? I'm not very old, but the older I get the more I appreciate originality and character.

The next time you post pictures throw some good prewar Model 70 actions in there. Maybe a Swift with a 10x Unertl on a G&H stock or the like!


I've seen 54's by most of the custom makers who were working at the time the 54 came out. The main reason they were used in the first few years IMO was because the stock was badly designed. Many writers of the day suggested that they be restocked. There is a pictured 54 by G&H on page four of my book.
 
Posts: 808 | Location: Anchorage, Alaska | Registered: 04 January 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Michael Robinson
posted Hide Post
As you say, Michael, "classics" indeed.

Great fluid lines on those stocks. Those reddish stocks with oval cheek pieces and schnabel fore ends are a delight to the eye.

The scopes are odd anachronisms, IMHO, but the rifles themselves are timeless.


Mike

Wilderness is my cathedral, and hunting is my prayer.
 
Posts: 13830 | Location: New England | Registered: 06 June 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Thanks guys!
We get an awful lot of traffic from here and it's much appreciated!
Best,
Steve


ACGG Life Member, since 1985
 
Posts: 1858 | Registered: 07 February 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Aaron Little
posted Hide Post
Now I see how Barney Worthen does it...


http://www.facebook.com/profil...p?id=100001646464847

A.M. Little Bespoke Gunmakers LLC
682-554-0044
Michael08TDK@yahoo.com
 
Posts: 1033 | Location: Mineola, TX | Registered: 15 October 2010Reply With Quote
new member
posted Hide Post
Add another thanks to Steve and Michael for finegunmaking.com and the addition of the Petrov material.
I love the essentialquality of the pre-war rifles and the quality of the photos really helps to see what the old-timers were up to.
 
Posts: 7 | Location: Texas | Registered: 03 January 2011Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia