Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
One of Us |
A friend had that exact scope and reticle on a Baer .264 AR. He had it in heavy Baer mounts on his rifle. Definitely not a QD option. He loved it. His gig was shooting clay pigeons as reactive targets. I shot it a few times. I'm not a great shot, but it was fun to be able to shoot a clay pigeon 6 times and break off chunks of it at 550 yards in a called fashion. My heavy long range plinking gun is a .308, and I have the bigger NSX on it with the mildot reticle. Its a lot busier and not as good target shooting option for ammo testing (its more for PRS type stuff for me- but was designed around sniping.) The pros are that its a very uncluttered reticle. The scope is repeatable. Good glass quality. Cons- very heavy scope. difficult to acquire targets at range due to small FOV. price. In your case, the scope might outweigh the barrel. I am not sure how well a QD mount will hold up with that heavy a scope for fine adjustment. QD means that there is movement by design. In your case, I'd say that you will probably be very happy with the scope- but that your ideas as to what is really accurate might change. | |||
|
One of Us |
Yes Sir, I have owned/shot a couple of the 12-42. They were actually designed for Benchrest . While there are Benchrest matches at longer distances (500, 1000) The vast majority are 100, 200 300. The amount of mirage at the longer ranges (500+) will very likely limit the effective use of the higher power this scope provides/. DuggaBoye-O NRA-Life Whittington-Life TSRA-Life DRSS DSC HSC SCI | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 2 |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia