THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM PRACTICAL PHOTOGRAPHY FORUM


Moderators: Pete E, Saeed
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Large Format
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted
Is anybody on here still using a view camera?
 
Posts: 7090 | Registered: 11 January 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 22WRF:
Is anybody on here still using a view camera?


If only I had the time ...

Cool
 
Posts: 13301 | Location: On the Couch with West Coast Cool | Registered: 20 June 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I've never owned a view camera but they certainly are still widely used by professionals. My friend Mustafa Bilal, Seattle-based photographer well known for his outstanding work in the firearms industry (if you've seen a recent Leupold catalog you've seen his work) routinely uses a view camera for his studio photos.

He has both film and digital backs for the camera and can provide clients with whichever they prefer. He told me he uses view cameras not so much as a matter of image sharpness/detail, but for the perspective and depth of field control available with view camera swings and tilts.
 
Posts: 219 | Registered: 27 March 2010Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Every now and then I drag out a plate camera, or medium format film camera, but not too often any more.
Been doing a bit of B&W developing with my niece it's fun but I wonder how we ever really got on with it for serious work.
There's a big resurgence of B&W now, unfortunately most of it looks pretty poor, grainy, low contrast, lots of motion blur and poor focus. People seem to be going from diggi to film without actually learning much about it.


"When doing battle, seek a quick victory."
 
Posts: 4739 | Location: London England | Registered: 11 May 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Wink
posted Hide Post
I learned how to take pictures and develop B&W with a Yashica Mat124G. But to be honest, I now have too much fun fiddling with digital at almost a fraction of the cost of film. And to think that only 3 years ago I was a staunch defender of film versus digital!


_________________________________

AR, where the hopeless, hysterical hypochondriacs of history become the nattering nabobs of negativisim.
 
Posts: 7046 | Location: Rambouillet, France | Registered: 25 June 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
HP5 120 roll £4 ...
to develop it at a good lab £10, that's £2 a shot just for the negs.
Your going to have to get some pretty special images to justify that!


"When doing battle, seek a quick victory."
 
Posts: 4739 | Location: London England | Registered: 11 May 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of DMCI*
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 22WRF:
Is anybody on here still using a view camera?


There was a time when a big view created some amazing images!



--------------------

EGO sum bastard ut does frendo

 
Posts: 2821 | Location: Left Coast | Registered: 23 September 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Still have a 4x5" Crown Graphic and a 4x5" Cambo monorail that are used for fun. Have 2 1/4x 3 1/4" roll film backs as well as GrafLock hoods for them.

The 2 1/4 Hassies and the large format cameras produce a very different presence than modern digitals do ... but are such a hassle to print!


Have scanned 4x5" negatives and printed them digitally. Lessens the hassle factor. You really do need BIG disk drives for storage.

The side view picture of the Cobra on the cars thread is one of those.


Mike

--------------
DRSS, Womper's Club, NRA Life Member/Charter Member NRA Golden Eagles ...
Knifemaker, http://www.mstarling.com
 
Posts: 6199 | Location: Charleston, WV | Registered: 31 August 2002Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia