THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM PRACTICAL PHOTOGRAPHY FORUM


Moderators: Pete E, Saeed
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Raw or jpeg
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted
On an upcoming safari in Tz w/ 30D and a couple of good lenses, would a guy want to take a combination of jpeg and raw exposures of trophies and other important things? Or, rather just one or the other. I would appreciate some input/comment. Thanks DrC


At Home on the Range-Texas Panhandle
 
Posts: 411 | Registered: 16 November 2006Reply With Quote
Moderator
posted Hide Post
There are two good reasons for using RAW format for digital photos:
1. they are uncompressed
2. they are acceptable as evidence in a court of law, as they cannot be edited and saved as .RAW files.

Since I doubt you care about the second reason, the first only really matters if you intend to manipulate the photos. Besides, they take up more of your storage disk than .jpgs.

A regular .jpg file is usually fine enough to capture almost every detail.

George


 
Posts: 14623 | Location: San Antonio, TX | Registered: 22 May 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
On my trip to TZ last October I took a 30D and only shot in RAW. You are able to change the light levels and white balance which can really improve the quality of your photos. Once I learned the benefits in shooting RAW I switched up to only shooting RAW.

Problem is that you have to process them prior to printing or sharing on your computer and they take up more disk space. I took a 80G wolverine to download the files to nightly and never had an issue with disk space. A laptop would serve the same function.

Taking both eats up considerably more disk space and it would be easy to run out of storage.

Good luck and have fun on your trip.
 
Posts: 195 | Location: Bremerton, WA | Registered: 09 May 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Thanks for the comments. All of the excitement and anticipation about the upcoming trip plus a new camera is almost overwhelming. Dr.C


At Home on the Range-Texas Panhandle
 
Posts: 411 | Registered: 16 November 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I personally think that you'd be fine for picture quality if you saved pics as the highest quality jpeg rather than raw ... they're much smaller.

If you take two or three 2 gb cards you'll be set for a bunch of pictures!


Mike

--------------
DRSS, Womper's Club, NRA Life Member/Charter Member NRA Golden Eagles ...
Knifemaker, http://www.mstarling.com
 
Posts: 6199 | Location: Charleston, WV | Registered: 31 August 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Depends, if you are only going to make prints up to about 8x10 you will not really have any advantage to shooting RAW. As you go up in size the RAW starts to look better and better with each step. The tonality of RAW files are better on the larger sizes.
If you do settle for jpegs make sure when you open the file you then save it as a uncompressed TIF and then you will not lose any data as you would with the jpegs.


My biggest fear is when I die my wife will sell my guns for what I told her they cost.
 
Posts: 6654 | Location: Wasilla, Alaska | Registered: 22 February 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Snowwolf: I think you have touched on an important topic but I don't understand the mechanics of what you said. What to do and what not to do, Please excuse my relative ignorance and thanks for the comment. Dr,C


At Home on the Range-Texas Panhandle
 
Posts: 411 | Registered: 16 November 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
In short, if you are only going to display your photos online or have a lab print them up to size 8x10 there is no need or advantage of shooting in RAW format.
Every time you open and close a jpeg file data is lost. You can avoid this by opening the jpeg and then saving it as a uncompressed tif file then the file will never change.


My biggest fear is when I die my wife will sell my guns for what I told her they cost.
 
Posts: 6654 | Location: Wasilla, Alaska | Registered: 22 February 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of D Humbarger
posted Hide Post
Any shot that you think that you might want done up in 8x10 or larger shoot & keep them in RAW. The rest jpeg. I shoot everything in RAW. Just carry enough cards.



Doug Humbarger
NRA Life member
Tonkin Gulf Yacht Club 72'73.
Yankee Station

Try to look unimportant. Your enemy might be low on ammo.
 
Posts: 8351 | Location: Jennings Louisiana, Arkansas by way of Alabama by way of South Carloina by way of County Antrim Irland by way of Lanarkshire Scotland. | Registered: 02 November 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Snowwolfe:
Every time you open and close a jpeg file data is lost.


Wow, really? Never knew that!

There's a lot I need to learn I figure, now that I switch to an SLR from a compact... as soon as I get the SLR back from Canon (see my next post).

Frans
 
Posts: 1717 | Location: Alberta, Canada | Registered: 17 March 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of desmobob900ss
posted Hide Post
With the price of storage media getting so resonable these days, I always keep my Nikon D70 set to store the RAW data and a JPG file.

It uses more storage space, but definitely solves the RAW vs. JPG dilemma!

Good shooting,
desmobob
 
Posts: 79 | Registered: 29 April 2007Reply With Quote
Administrator
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Frans Diepstraten:
quote:
Originally posted by Snowwolfe:
Every time you open and close a jpeg file data is lost.


Wow, really? Never knew that!

There's a lot I need to learn I figure, now that I switch to an SLR from a compact... as soon as I get the SLR back from Canon (see my next post).

Frans


May be a little clarification is needed here.

You loose some details each time you MANOPULATE a jpg file, not each time you open it.


www.accuratereloading.com
Instagram : ganyana2000
 
Posts: 69288 | Location: Dubai, UAE | Registered: 08 January 1998Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
m

Saeed: Thanks for that clarifacation. In the first place I didn't think that jpeg files could manipulated at all and I couldn't see how data could be lost. I've decided to take plenty of memory cards and shoot large fine jpeg and raw files. Thanks Dr.C


At Home on the Range-Texas Panhandle
 
Posts: 411 | Registered: 16 November 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by doccash:
On an upcoming safari in Tz w/ 30D and a couple of good lenses, would a guy want to take a combination of jpeg and raw exposures of trophies and other important things? Or, rather just one or the other. I would appreciate some input/comment. Thanks DrC


Set you camera for both (JPEG & RAW). Just take another 2GB memory card with you. Also, at the end of the day you can preview the photos and delete that ones that are not good.

A good thing about RAW is that if you take the photo in the wrong WB setting, you still can adjust the WB when processing the image. This is easily done with PhotoShop.

When working with JPEG photos, save the original on TIFF format to avoid losing image quality. Always leave the original image alone; just work on a copy of the original

To be on the safe side, you can always make a copy of the original, and wok of the copy, but always change the name of the photo as you save it.

RAW: never change the original photo. All originals (JPEG, RAW, TIFF, etc.), should be saved and left alone. Work on copies of the originals.
 
Posts: 1103 | Location: Alaska | Registered: 04 January 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Ray: Good advise...Thanks. Dr.C


At Home on the Range-Texas Panhandle
 
Posts: 411 | Registered: 16 November 2006Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia