THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM LEVER ACTION RIFLE FORUM

Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Re: Marlin 1894S
 Login/Join
 
new member
posted
to what i gather,the 30/30's and 35 rem.are still micro-groove rifling and i believe the .22's are also...micro groove for 30/30 and 35,.22 are fine,the bigger bores with cast bullets implements the need for ballard type rifling,course a faster rate of twist for the 44 would be better in my opinion,1in38"will handle up to around 300gr.bullets,after that they start to keyhole/destabilize,1in20"twist like the 444 would be ideal i think......just my opinion as a 44 shooter....
 
Posts: 20 | Registered: 18 April 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
nc34hunter,

Thanks for the reply. I was confused since I've read posts were someone claims to have a .444 with micro-groove. And I agree with the 1 in 38 twist not being the best for the heavy cast bullets although mine will stabilize the 270 Gold Dots and a few sample 300 lswcs I tried in it (fast). I've started casting the Lyman #429421 245grn Keith type bullet in mine and just love it. Was a little supprised that mine will cycle the 1.690" to 1.700" OAL alright though. BM

Bill
 
Posts: 128 | Location: Hensley, AR | Registered: 05 June 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
From what I have noticed Ballard rifling marked barrels have ***** while the other barrels are marked in lettering MICRO GROOVE.

There are pro's and con's for both.
 
Posts: 1820 | Location: USA, Omaha, Nebr | Registered: 16 September 2002Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia