THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM ALASKA HUNTING FORUM


Moderators: Paul H
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Make sense, Alaskans?
 Login/Join
 
one of us
Picture of Bill/Oregon
posted
I'm not quite sure what he is saying here.

https://www.adn.com/outdoors-a...one-in-the-outdoors/


There is hope, even when your brain tells you there isn’t.
– John Green, author
 
Posts: 16680 | Location: Las Cruces, NM | Registered: 03 June 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Fury01
posted Hide Post
He is saying people are more dangerous than bears so “what do you carry for people “ is a more pertinent question. My answer would have been “same as I carry for bears.”


"The liberty enjoyed by the people of these states of worshiping Almighty God agreeably to their conscience, is not only among the choicest of their blessings, but also of their rights."
~George Washington - 1789
 
Posts: 2135 | Location: Where God breathes life into the Amber Waves of Grain and owns the cattle on a thousand hills. | Registered: 20 August 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Scott King
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Bill/Oregon:
I'm not quite sure what he is saying here.

https://www.adn.com/outdoors-a...one-in-the-outdoors/


" the titillation we humans seem to enjoy from wild animals is often the product of overactive imaginations,..."

I think summarizes the intent of the author and article quite nicely.

I think the article is a timely offering and a wise bit of shared philosophy for the 2019 Alaska Tourism Season. Alaska is about to be happily inundated with tourists, almost all unfortunately harboring an elevated fear of bears and the possibility of an encounter. I hope many get the opportunity to read and take council from this article.
 
Posts: 9656 | Location: Dillingham Alaska | Registered: 10 April 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
The odds of needing any safety equipment are slim to none.

So why wear your seatbelt, helmet, PFD, have fire extinghsers, have/use any other.

The odds are one will never have to use it.
 
Posts: 19740 | Location: wis | Registered: 21 April 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Well, the gun is the last resort. Being Bear Aware starts between the ears. But, you'll not catch me in the AK woods without a bear gun. I don't pack a backup handgun sheep hunting though because of the nature of the backpack expedition hunt. I do pack a handgun backup on my hip though moose hunting and on a Kodiak deer hunt a few years back. Primary weapon was a Ruger 45 Colt w/2X scope. Backup is a 4" Redhawk turned into a 454. Each to his own.
 
Posts: 71 | Location: The Last Frontier | Registered: 03 January 2012Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Scott King
posted Hide Post
" Each to his own" has limits.
The problem I see is the titillation and imagination mentioned in the article.
The -06 isn't big enough so we get a 338. The .338 isn't big enough so we buy a .375.
"Bear Aware" morphs into the " titillating and imaginary" voracious, man eating bear behind every Willow stem.

Here in this forum we have had members mention that they sleep with their .44 strapped to them in the sleeping bag and another compared bears to man eating tigers. faint. Lunatics.
The presupposition that one needs or requires a firearm for defense when visiting Alaska is false. Want a firearm? Gonna bring one anyway? Well whatever, it's your luggage.
 
Posts: 9656 | Location: Dillingham Alaska | Registered: 10 April 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Scott King:
" Each to his own" has limits.
The problem I see is the titillation and imagination mentioned in the article.
The -06 isn't big enough so we get a 338. The .338 isn't big enough so we buy a .375.
"Bear Aware" morphs into the " titillating and imaginary" voracious, man eating bear behind every Willow stem.


To each there own. What I bring on any given outing, depends on where I am going & what time of year. YMMV tu2
 
Posts: 2361 | Location: KENAI, ALASKA | Registered: 10 November 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Bill/Oregon
posted Hide Post
My only time in Alaska was a fishing trip 20-some years ago to Andrew Creek, near the mouth of the Stikine, just across the salt from Wrangell. Our Wrangell-based outfitter left us at our Forest Service cabin with an old Mossberg 12-gauge pump loaded with buck and slugs and instructions to call him by radio if we had a bear incident. I personally carried a stainless Redhawk .44 with heavy hardcast handloads. Our outfitter's Tlingit father-in-law opined that it was a little better than nothing.
We of course fished by day and spent the nights in the cabin. It had been unusually warm for late August, and as a result the bears -- have no idea if they were browns or just grizz -- fed at night. We found parts of salmon, fresh poop piles, and their huge tracks on top of ours from the day before.
Their tracks often led to tunnel-like holes in the thick walls of brush lining the creek.
Was I just another clown from the Lower 48 for carrying a handgun under these circumstances? Curious what "real Alaskans" would have carried -- if anything -- in this place.


There is hope, even when your brain tells you there isn’t.
– John Green, author
 
Posts: 16680 | Location: Las Cruces, NM | Registered: 03 June 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Scott King
posted Hide Post
Certainly not clown Bill.
But as the author of this piece found, you didn't " need" your Redhawk. Want or like, fine, didn't need. Many many folks fish the Wrangell area and Alaska generally without " needing a handgun".

I think what the author takes issue with and I agree is the imaginary and amplified threat bears in Alaska pose to the populace.
 
Posts: 9656 | Location: Dillingham Alaska | Registered: 10 April 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I have been sheep hunting in AK on three occasions, the Yukon once and the NWT once. I never carried a pistol. I have been to BC on three occasions on mixed bag hunts. I have never carried a pistol.

In August, I am going back to BC to hunt sheep. I am not taking a pistol. In late September, I am heading back to Alaska to hunt brown bears where the camp will be a stationary tent. We will hunt out of that fixed location. I am going to take my (you guessed it) 44 magnum. It will stay in the tent.

Why am I taking a pistol? My answer is why not. I don't have to lug it around . It causes zero inconvenience. It does not slow me down at all.

In all of those trips have I ever had a grizzly encounter that I didn't want. Yes, twice. Sort of. My first trip to AK, I shot a charging griz. We managed to walk up on its kill unknowingly. A pistol would have done nothing for me. I once fell asleep on the top of a mountain in the Yukon. When I woke up, there were grizzly tracks in the snow a few yards away.

To each his own. If it is legal and it makes you feel better, go for it.
 
Posts: 12134 | Location: Orlando, FL | Registered: 26 January 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Larry
For our readers information it is illegal to transport a handgun into canada.A resident isn't allowed to hunt with them either.
 
Posts: 371 | Location: northcentral mt | Registered: 25 May 2010Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of buckeyeshooter
posted Hide Post
I must be very strange? For almost 40 years I have carried a SW 44 Magnum about everywhere. By that I mean everywhere but places it is against the law. Maybe I am just used to it? I does not weigh much more than a bag of burgers in my opinion. If you can't carry it because it is too heavy, I wonder if you are in good enough condition to be walking around in the outdoors.
Now, I must admit the at times these days I leave the 44 magnum at home..... because I am carrying the SW .500 instead.
 
Posts: 5725 | Location: Ohio | Registered: 02 April 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
I must be very strange? For almost 40 years I have carried a SW 44 Magnum about everywhere.


Some people prefer to be armed.

I am one of them also.

Other don't.
 
Posts: 19740 | Location: wis | Registered: 21 April 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
To each his own. I personally know two people who killed bears in defense of life, one brown on Kodiak and one interior grizz up north.

I have been bluff charged twice by black bear sows with cubs. Yelling and quickly putting some distance between us and the cubs resolved both encounters. No need to use our rifles in either case.

I carry a handgun when engaging in various outdoor activities, fishing, dipnetting, ATV riding etc. I would prefer to have it and not need it than to need it and not have it. I just feel more comfortable knowing I have some protection. I doubt I'll ever need to use a handgun to shoot a bear but it gives me peace of mind to carry it.

Plus, I really like firearms. The more chance I get to carry and use them the better.
 
Posts: 452 | Location: North Pole, Alaska | Registered: 28 April 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
The article is rather pointless imo..


Ray Atkinson
Atkinson Hunting Adventures
10 Ward Lane,
Filer, Idaho, 83328
208-731-4120

rayatkinsonhunting@gmail.com
 
Posts: 42226 | Location: Twin Falls, Idaho | Registered: 04 June 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Atkinson:
The article is rather pointless imo..


I agree.

From what I have seen from other articles the ADN is some what anti gun.

So I am sure the author wrote what he needed to to get paid for.
 
Posts: 19740 | Location: wis | Registered: 21 April 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Scott King
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Macs B:
I don't think there is much in that article that could be construed to be anti gun or anti hunting. I do think the author was trying to make the point that so many people have false assumptions of what constitutes the true dangers of outdoor pursuits. Let's face facts the single most dangerous actor in the woods isn't Mr. Grizzly bear, its a person. So many of us buy into the nonsense that you're putting your life in danger if you step into the field without a dangerous game rifle, and a back up on your hip. We had a discussion on here a while back about how many hunters honestly felt their double rifles were a necessity due to the dangers of hunting Africa. I find it funny how many truly believe they are in peril without the trusty H&H for sorting things out. Same premise as the author points out, after many years of not needing a 44 in the Alaskan bush, he finally came to the conclusion that he really didn't need it in the first place. Can't say that I would argue with his logic either.


Well, the " it just ain't that big and scary!" line of thinking doesn't sell new guns, more bullets, longer knives or new books and articles that " titillate the imagination".
I haven't looked at it, but I did see a " 505 Gibbs for plainsgame" title in the big bore forum.
UEG.
Clearly some of our friends here have had their imaginations titillated into hysteria.
 
Posts: 9656 | Location: Dillingham Alaska | Registered: 10 April 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I just found that a handgun was a big PIA and I always had a rifle anyway while in the field during my years in AK. I did not find a handgun gave me a level security that made up for the inconvenience of carrying one. I never carried any gun while working in the yard and we were in bear central 1/2 mile from the city dump. I never felt complacent I just felt like everyone else in Dillingham that bears were just a part of life June-Oct.

If you like carrying a handgun that's great but it isn't absolutely necessary just because you are in bear country.

Mark


MARK H. YOUNG
MARK'S EXCLUSIVE ADVENTURES
7094 Oakleigh Dr. Las Vegas, NV 89110
Office 702-848-1693
Cell, Whats App, Signal 307-250-1156 PREFERRED
E-mail markttc@msn.com
Website: myexclusiveadventures.com
Skype: markhyhunter
Check us out on https://www.facebook.com/pages...ures/627027353990716
 
Posts: 13091 | Location: LAS VEGAS, NV USA | Registered: 04 August 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Bill/Oregon
posted Hide Post
Mark, I wouldn't dream of carrying a handgun if I was already carrying a rifle. But when that long thin thing in your hand is just a 7-weight fly rod and you are in remote big bear country with daily activity, and the salmon are literally swimming between your legs ...


There is hope, even when your brain tells you there isn’t.
– John Green, author
 
Posts: 16680 | Location: Las Cruces, NM | Registered: 03 June 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of buckeyeshooter
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by MARK H. YOUNG:
I just found that a handgun was a big PIA and I always had a rifle anyway while in the field during my years in AK. I did not find a handgun gave me a level security that made up for the inconvenience of carrying one. I never carried any gun while working in the yard and we were in bear central 1/2 mile from the city dump. I never felt complacent I just felt like everyone else in Dillingham that bears were just a part of life June-Oct.

If you like carrying a handgun that's great but it isn't absolutely necessary just because you are in bear country.

Mark
yea, but might be a really good idea on 3 mile road in Detroit or anywhere in Flint or Memphis. Because, I have to go to places like that, I feel 'naked' without it. So, you can bet, I will have that handgun even when carrying a rifle.
 
Posts: 5725 | Location: Ohio | Registered: 02 April 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Scott King
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by buckeyeshooter:
quote:
Originally posted by MARK H. YOUNG:
I just found that a handgun was a big PIA and I always had a rifle anyway while in the field during my years in AK. I did not find a handgun gave me a level security that made up for the inconvenience of carrying one. I never carried any gun while working in the yard and we were in bear central 1/2 mile from the city dump. I never felt complacent I just felt like everyone else in Dillingham that bears were just a part of life June-Oct.

If you like carrying a handgun that's great but it isn't absolutely necessary just because you are in bear country.

Mark
yea, but might be a really good idea on 3 mile road in Detroit or anywhere in Flint or Memphis. Because, I have to go to places like that, I feel 'naked' without it. So, you can bet, I will have that handgun even when carrying a rifle.


Do please try to lighten up quite a bit before vacationing in AK. faint
 
Posts: 9656 | Location: Dillingham Alaska | Registered: 10 April 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of buckeyeshooter
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Scott King:
quote:
Originally posted by buckeyeshooter:
quote:
Originally posted by MARK H. YOUNG:
I just found that a handgun was a big PIA and I always had a rifle anyway while in the field during my years in AK. I did not find a handgun gave me a level security that made up for the inconvenience of carrying one. I never carried any gun while working in the yard and we were in bear central 1/2 mile from the city dump. I never felt complacent I just felt like everyone else in Dillingham that bears were just a part of life June-Oct.

If you like carrying a handgun that's great but it isn't absolutely necessary just because you are in bear country.

Mark
yea, but might be a really good idea on 3 mile road in Detroit or anywhere in Flint or Memphis. Because, I have to go to places like that, I feel 'naked' without it. So, you can bet, I will have that handgun even when carrying a rifle.


Do please try to lighten up quite a bit before vacationing in AK. faint


exactly why I like to visit Alaska. Very relaxing.
 
Posts: 5725 | Location: Ohio | Registered: 02 April 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of chuck375
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by sep:
To each his own. I personally know two people who killed bears in defense of life, one brown on Kodiak and one interior grizz up north.

I have been bluff charged twice by black bear sows with cubs. Yelling and quickly putting some distance between us and the cubs resolved both encounters. No need to use our rifles in either case.

I carry a handgun when engaging in various outdoor activities, fishing, dipnetting, ATV riding etc. I would prefer to have it and not need it than to need it and not have it. I just feel more comfortable knowing I have some protection. I doubt I'll ever need to use a handgun to shoot a bear but it gives me peace of mind to carry it.

Plus, I really like firearms. The more chance I get to carry and use them the better.


Agree, why carry a pistol when you're hunting carrying a rifle. When camping, fishing or hiking in bear country more often than not, I carry my Springfield v16 in 45 Super.


Regards,

Chuck



"There's a saying in prize fighting, everyone's got a plan until they get hit"

Michael Douglas "The Ghost And The Darkness"
 
Posts: 4802 | Location: Colorado Springs | Registered: 01 January 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of ismith
posted Hide Post
Better an over abundance of caution than what happens in Yellowstone with the Bison selfie takers, and people jumping into boiling hot springs and such.


What force or guile could not subdue,
Thro' many warlike ages,
Is wrought now by a coward few,
For hireling traitor's wages.
 
Posts: 262 | Location: Montana | Registered: 17 January 2018Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Fury01
posted Hide Post
We people often think our life experiences are the standard measure of life and thus our choices are also then the “right” standard choice.
I carry what I think I can as measured against what I might need. There are compromises that have to be made in that equation. Where I am and what the agenda has on it can vary widely. However, what I am carrying will be used in the best way possible to deal with any mortal danger whether human or animal. I would think that is precisely why Phil stuck his ccw sized 9mm in his gear load out instead of Old Ugly on that day’s fishing trip. His knowledge and experience guided him to the loads that were within it.


"The liberty enjoyed by the people of these states of worshiping Almighty God agreeably to their conscience, is not only among the choicest of their blessings, but also of their rights."
~George Washington - 1789
 
Posts: 2135 | Location: Where God breathes life into the Amber Waves of Grain and owns the cattle on a thousand hills. | Registered: 20 August 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Cold Trigger Finger
posted Hide Post
The article seems to be written from an urban Alaska's pov.
Having spent 41 continuous years in Alaska and lived and worked from 1 end of the state to the other . And 1 side of it to the other. And been an outdoors man for all that time. Meaning I made my living outdoors mostly on my feet.
I've learned that bears aren't the biggest thing to be concerned with. But are a big enough thing that precautions should be maintained.
Bears aren't dangerous until they are close enuf to touch you. But they can get that close real fast.

Obviously some knuckle head that would put his handgun on a tire and drive off isn't much of a gun guy . Or imho a prudent individual. So most of what he says comes out as urban , progressive blather.
However , he does make a good point about asking people who query him about bear protection. What do they carry for 2 legged protection.

Having successfully protected myself from a black bear problem with a 4 5/8" Blackhawk 41 mag in the summer of 91 . I don't see and problem with packin a 41. Having run off brown bears while armed with only a 40 S&W and 357 mag. And having packed 44 mags 45 Colts, 454 Casul, 480 Rugers and 10 mm autos.
They all worked great to give me the confidence to bluff dozens of bears into getting away from me and leaving me and mine alone.
If you spend alot of time in a bear rich area, your going to bump into bears. Just all there is to it.
And because I know 10 figers full of people that have been mauled by, bit or swatted by brown bear.
I've used my Spruce King (SS Ruger M77 Mk2 in 458 Win mag) to hide behind in more than 45 different up close bear encounters where I did not shoot the bears. And used many other rifles in many other up close encounters.
My opinion is that. Having a firearm and a good dog or 2 with you is prudent.
Anyone that doesn't want to pack a firearm , have fun.

Bill, my opinion is that you were suitably attired to ensure you enjoyed your Alaskan adventure . Anyone poo poos that, flip em off !


Phil Shoemaker : "I went to a .30-06 on a fine old Mauser action. That worked successfully for a few years until a wounded, vindictive brown bear taught me that precise bullet placement is not always possible in thick alders, at spitting distances and when time is measured in split seconds. Lucky to come out of that lesson alive, I decided to look for a more suitable rifle."
 
Posts: 1934 | Location: Eastern Central Alaska | Registered: 15 July 2014Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of A7Dave
posted Hide Post
Writers gotta write. I read the article and mostly thought - hmmm, needed a go to topic to fill a few paragraphs. Nothing really wrong with what he says. Pretty basic. He and his partner write nice hunting articles.


Dave
 
Posts: 927 | Location: AKexpat | Registered: 27 October 2008Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by A7Dave:
Writers gotta write. I read the article and mostly thought - hmmm, needed a go to topic to fill a few paragraphs. Nothing really wrong with what he says. Pretty basic. He and his partner write nice hunting articles.


He wrights pretty good for a retired Prison Gard
tu2 coffee
 
Posts: 2361 | Location: KENAI, ALASKA | Registered: 10 November 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of A7Dave
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by tsturm:
quote:
Originally posted by A7Dave:
Writers gotta write. I read the article and mostly thought - hmmm, needed a go to topic to fill a few paragraphs. Nothing really wrong with what he says. Pretty basic. He and his partner write nice hunting articles.


He wrights pretty good for a retired Prison Gard
tu2 coffee


No kidding?! Good for him. Enjoy his articles.


Dave
 
Posts: 927 | Location: AKexpat | Registered: 27 October 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of A7Dave
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by tsturm:
quote:
Originally posted by A7Dave:
Writers gotta write. I read the article and mostly thought - hmmm, needed a go to topic to fill a few paragraphs. Nothing really wrong with what he says. Pretty basic. He and his partner write nice hunting articles.


He wrights pretty good for a retired Prison Gard
tu2 coffee


Or am I an idiot and he's you? Smiler


Dave
 
Posts: 927 | Location: AKexpat | Registered: 27 October 2008Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by A7Dave:
quote:
Originally posted by tsturm:
quote:
Originally posted by A7Dave:
Writers gotta write. I read the article and mostly thought - hmmm, needed a go to topic to fill a few paragraphs. Nothing really wrong with what he says. Pretty basic. He and his partner write nice hunting articles.


He wrights pretty good for a retired Prison Gard
tu2 coffee


Or am I an idiot and he's you? Smiler


Nope your no idiot, 20 years ago I did have 2 interviews with him at the local prison. Belong to the same gun club. He is a crazy (or was) SOB!! dancing tu2
 
Posts: 2361 | Location: KENAI, ALASKA | Registered: 10 November 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
All the writer is trying to say in his article is as follows: "I will tell you my opinion about the .44 Magnum revolver or any other handgun used for bear protection. However, take my "opinions" with a grain of salt, for opinions are like anuses, and we all have one of those."

Sorry folks, I could not help myself. When reading the article I thought about another quote often used by "some" gun writers: "...after watching numerous animals being killed by all kinds of rifles, I haven't seen a discernible difference in killing power from the .270 wall the way up to the .338WM. The real difference start with the .35-calibers."

Smiler
 
Posts: 492 | Location: Alaska | Registered: 20 November 2013Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Ray Alaska:
All the writer is trying to say in his article is as follows: "I will tell you my opinion about the .44 Magnum revolver or any other handgun used for bear protection. However, take my "opinions" with a grain of salt, for opinions are like anuses, and we all have one of those."

Sorry folks, I could not help myself. When reading the article I thought about another quote often used by "some" gun writers: "...after watching numerous animals being killed by all kinds of rifles, I haven't seen a discernible difference in killing power from the .270 all the way up to the .338WM. The real difference start with the .35-calibers."

Smiler
 
Posts: 492 | Location: Alaska | Registered: 20 November 2013Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia