THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM ALASKA HUNTING FORUM

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Hunting  Hop To Forums  Alaska Hunting Forum    Alaska Fights Effort to Protect Polar Bears

Moderators: Paul H
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Alaska Fights Effort to Protect Polar Bears
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,332020,00.html

Alaska Fights Effort to Protect Polar Bears
Friday, February 22, 2008

ANCHORAGE, Alaska — The polar bear can be found in just one place in United States — Alaska — and is perhaps as much a symbol of the state as alligators are of Florida. So you might think Alaska's politicians would be pounding on doors in Washington to protect it.

You would be wrong.

As the U.S. government decides whether to list polar bears as threatened under the Endangered Species Act, Gov. Sarah Palin and the state's Republican congressional delegation are solidly opposed to the idea.

Listing the polar bear would trigger a plan to protect the shrinking Arctic sea ice. And that, Alaskans fear, could dim chances for a proposed project that could bring the state's next big boom: a natural gas pipeline that would tap the North Slope's vast reserves.

"This is yet another example of how a law with the best of intentions has been subverted by the lawyers for the extreme environmental organizations and the liberal Democratic leadership," Rep. Don Young said.

Alaska's elected officials reject climate models that predict a complete summer meltdown of the polar ice cap by 2030 or sooner. They also dispute a U.S. Geological Survey study that predicts polar bears in Alaska could be wiped out by 2050.

Listing polar bears as threatened "would establish a dangerous precedent based on mathematical models instead of biological observations," Sen. Ted Stevens said Tuesday.

Similarly, Alaska political leaders have ardently supported the opening of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to oil drilling, despite strong opposition from environmentalists and politicians in the continental U.S. The issue is still before Congress.

Andrew Wetzler of Natural Resources Defense Council, one of the groups that sued to protect polar bears, said the state's position, scientifically speaking, is "mostly gibberish" and "motivated by economic concerns and political concerns."

He said that there is considerable evidence of a decline in polar bears in Canada and Alaska — with some of the animals starving, turning to cannibalism and drowning — and that most scientists believe the drop-off is directly related to the loss of sea ice.

Listing a species as "threatened" means it is likely to become endangered. "Endangered" is even more dire and means a species is in danger of extinction throughout all or much of its range.

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service missed its Jan. 9 deadline for a decision on the polar bear. Director Dale Hall said that the agency had never declared a species threatened or endangered because of climate change and that it needed more time to "do it right and have it explained properly to the public."

Alaska was built on booms — fur, gold, military expansion, oil — and the state is in need of another one.

Nearly 90 percent of Alaska's unrestricted revenue for next year is projected to come from the oil industry, and state leaders fear the not-so-distant future when oil earnings fall dramatically with a drop in production.

The mighty trans-Alaska pipeline has been running at less than half its capacity since 2000, and only high oil prices have prevented a dive in state income.

The proposed $26 billion (euro17.51 billion) natural gas pipeline would be the largest private-sector project ever undertaken in North America. It would tap 35 trillion cubic feet (1 trillion cubic meters) of proven natural gas reserves on Alaska's North Slope.

Summer sea ice in Alaska dropped last year to its lowest level in 38 years of satellite record-keeping, falling to 1.65 million square miles (4.27 million square kilometers), or about 1.15 million square miles (2.98 million square kilometers) less than the average from 1970 to 2000. The loss is bigger than the combined area of Alaska, Texas, California and Georgia.

A 2006 USGS study put the number of polar bears in the Beaufort Sea at 1,526, compared with 1,800 in 1986. But USGS researchers said the studies used different counting methods and the numbers cannot be directly compared.




 
Posts: 5798 | Registered: 10 July 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by DMB:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,332020,00.html

Alaska Fights Effort to Protect Polar Bears
Friday, February 22, 2008

ANCHORAGE, Alaska — The polar bear can be found in just one place in United States — Alaska — and is perhaps as much a symbol of the state as alligators are of Florida. So you might think Alaska's politicians would be pounding on doors in Washington to protect it.

You would be wrong.

As the U.S. government decides whether to list polar bears as threatened under the Endangered Species Act, Gov. Sarah Palin and the state's Republican congressional delegation are solidly opposed to the idea.

Listing the polar bear would trigger a plan to protect the shrinking Arctic sea ice. And that, Alaskans fear, could dim chances for a proposed project that could bring the state's next big boom: a natural gas pipeline that would tap the North Slope's vast reserves.

"This is yet another example of how a law with the best of intentions has been subverted by the lawyers for the extreme environmental organizations and the liberal Democratic leadership," Rep. Don Young said.

Alaska's elected officials reject climate models that predict a complete summer meltdown of the polar ice cap by 2030 or sooner. They also dispute a U.S. Geological Survey study that predicts polar bears in Alaska could be wiped out by 2050.

Listing polar bears as threatened "would establish a dangerous precedent based on mathematical models instead of biological observations," Sen. Ted Stevens said Tuesday.

Similarly, Alaska political leaders have ardently supported the opening of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to oil drilling, despite strong opposition from environmentalists and politicians in the continental U.S. The issue is still before Congress.

Andrew Wetzler of Natural Resources Defense Council, one of the groups that sued to protect polar bears, said the state's position, scientifically speaking, is "mostly gibberish" and "motivated by economic concerns and political concerns."

He said that there is considerable evidence of a decline in polar bears in Canada and Alaska — with some of the animals starving, turning to cannibalism and drowning — and that most scientists believe the drop-off is directly related to the loss of sea ice.

Listing a species as "threatened" means it is likely to become endangered. "Endangered" is even more dire and means a species is in danger of extinction throughout all or much of its range.

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service missed its Jan. 9 deadline for a decision on the polar bear. Director Dale Hall said that the agency had never declared a species threatened or endangered because of climate change and that it needed more time to "do it right and have it explained properly to the public."

Alaska was built on booms — fur, gold, military expansion, oil — and the state is in need of another one.

Nearly 90 percent of Alaska's unrestricted revenue for next year is projected to come from the oil industry, and state leaders fear the not-so-distant future when oil earnings fall dramatically with a drop in production.

The mighty trans-Alaska pipeline has been running at less than half its capacity since 2000, and only high oil prices have prevented a dive in state income.

The proposed $26 billion (euro17.51 billion) natural gas pipeline would be the largest private-sector project ever undertaken in North America. It would tap 35 trillion cubic feet (1 trillion cubic meters) of proven natural gas reserves on Alaska's North Slope.

Summer sea ice in Alaska dropped last year to its lowest level in 38 years of satellite record-keeping, falling to 1.65 million square miles (4.27 million square kilometers), or about 1.15 million square miles (2.98 million square kilometers) less than the average from 1970 to 2000. The loss is bigger than the combined area of Alaska, Texas, California and Georgia.

A 2006 USGS study put the number of polar bears in the Beaufort Sea at 1,526, compared with 1,800 in 1986. But USGS researchers said the studies used different counting methods and the numbers cannot be directly compared.




bsflagThere are plenty of Polar bears & Plenty of Ice. The lower 48 bunny hugging dickweeds need to keep their uninformed bullshit out of Alaska!! dancing
 
Posts: 2361 | Location: KENAI, ALASKA | Registered: 10 November 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of gumboot458
posted Hide Post
. homer ......I,m suprised Fox News puts such a liberal left wing enviro wako slant on it .....This global warming BS is such a lie and American society has slid so far into being [DUMBED DOWN ] that this foolishness has gotten too powerful ...........But the colleges keep cranking out these further and further gone , anti productive americans that I don,t know what will become of Alaska .........When Capitan James Cook "discovered " Icy Strait , Glacier Bay wasn,t a bay and Icy Strait was full of ice ..............
The Matanuska Valley wasn,t formed in the last 30 years ..................ECT ECT ECT ECT ECT .!!!!!!!!!!!!!All the valcanos that are spouting off are changeing the climate more than people are ............. Mad Mad horse


.If it can,t be grown , its gotta be mined ....
 
Posts: 3445 | Location: Copper River Valley , Prudhoe Bay , and other interesting locales | Registered: 19 November 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
IMO this should be titled "Alaska Fights Outside Meddling...."

It's amazing how many experts there are about Alaska, its climate, wildlife, and uses.....some of them have even visted the state once. clap

Dan
 
Posts: 430 | Location: Anchorage, AK | Registered: 02 March 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of BW
posted Hide Post
It's not bullshit that the ice has retreated, and it could very well be due to global warming. In fact, I can't think of any other reason than global warming.

That said, the causes of global warming are open for debate, as are the cures. But don't let the fact a 'greenie' said it, make you not think about it and accept the truth.

As for the polar bear, and being listed on the endangered species act, it's purely an attempt to control oil drilling offshore in the Chukchi and Beaufort Seas. The 'greenies' want the bears listed in order to force concessions, and cash, from the oil companies.

Once listed, the oil companies will be forced to payoff the environmentalist to avoid even more lawsuits and injunctions. Right now they're doing a pretty good job of hamstringing Shell, but with the polar bear listed, they'll have a lot more power.

I've seen the polar bears around oil field activities, and it doesn't bother them.


Brian
 
Posts: 778 | Location: Alaska | Registered: 23 May 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
It's a reality there's money to be made or lost in Alaska based on the outcome of some of these environmental issues. A few months ago, I saw a special on the Discovery Channel where a biologist stated roughly 50% of the female polar bears are already denning up on land because of the thinning icecap. If almost half of em have already figured it out, I'm confident more will catch on as the ice continues to melt. There's more to this equation than simply melting ice and I don't believe the scientists fully understand it...yet. However, I suspect we'll run out of meddlesome lower 48 liberal do-gooders long before we run out of polar bears.
 
Posts: 452 | Location: North Pole, Alaska | Registered: 28 April 2001Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Hunting  Hop To Forums  Alaska Hunting Forum    Alaska Fights Effort to Protect Polar Bears

Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia