THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM CUSTOM RIFLE FORUM

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Custom Built Rifles    Has the Jerry Fisher style of stock fallen out of favor?
Page 1 2 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Has the Jerry Fisher style of stock fallen out of favor?
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Who else is holding their breath for the OP to propose the definitive of The Jerry Fisher Style?
 
Posts: 29 | Registered: 02 October 2014Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of bluefish
posted Hide Post
If one has to ask, new guy...
 
Posts: 5232 | Location: The way life should be | Registered: 24 May 2012Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by gunmaker:
Exactly
This thread is about Jerry's stock design which was built to be hunted with.

Paper punchers can be fun as well, but I'd rather not try and hit a running coyote with the current fad in "custom" rifles. Ultra light stock, high comb, massive scope and a #4-5 barrel. You couldn't even lead a broadside running yote enough with most of the coolest new scopes.

The whole system has to work together.


At the same time, I like high combs because I am long with high cheekbones. At the same time, I like some drop at the heel. This means I like Monte Carlo combs. This is true for everything but prone shooting where I like no drop at the heel. By the way, I can miss running coyotes with any rifle, regardless of stock design! Regards, Bill
 
Posts: 3857 | Location: Elko, B.C. Canada | Registered: 19 June 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by gunmaker:
quote:
Originally posted by ZekeShikar:

That's correct but they were designed by shooters!

Zeke

Shooters that spent more time reading about hunting, or hunting targets from the bench, than actually stalking something with fur on it.


Sure gunmaker,
That might be true of some shooters but that's a pretty big blanket-statement to throw around and in no way describes me.
No doubt that you know how to make a gun that meets with your needs and wants but is stock design more of a "one size fits all" or is there any room in your world for what someone else likes? Can't a stock be a little higher in the comb, to accommodate a scope, and still retain classic lines or is it "copious drop at the heal or nothing"?

Asking for a friend. haha

Zeke
 
Posts: 2270 | Registered: 27 October 2011Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of gunmaker
posted Hide Post
I build most all my stocks so the nose of the comb just clears the cocking piece. How much higher can you go?

The drop at heel depends on what type of sighting.

Shooting a straight comb stock is kind of like trying to shoot an AR flattop with low rings. Trying to squeeze your cheek bones on the comb while canting your head sideways with only the toe of the stock on your shoulder.

There's better ways to design a stock.

Many "modern" designs have been pushed where they are by gunwriters. And I'm not talking writers like Turpin and Carmichel who have actually stocked several rifles.

Don't forget some cast in the design. Only problem there is you can't pull a right and left stock out of the same mold.

I don't have anything against people spending time shooting off the bags at the bench or over the hood (where legal). Stalking rifle designs with their slim forends and open grips are not as easy to shoot tiny groups with. But they are more delightful to carry all day.

I would guess there are many more shooters today than hunters influencing stock design. ESPECIALLY in the synthetic world. Not a bad thing, just a thing.

Jerry built stalking rifles.

If you spend all day in an elevated blind, his style might not be for you.


gunmaker
------------------
James Anderson Metalsmith & Stockmaker
WEB SITE

More Pics on FLICKR
 
Posts: 1864 | Location: Western South Dakota | Registered: 05 January 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of gunmaker
posted Hide Post
The beauty of commissioning a custom rifle is when it's your money, spend it on what you want. Not where somebody on a forum or in a magazine tells you to.


gunmaker
------------------
James Anderson Metalsmith & Stockmaker
WEB SITE

More Pics on FLICKR
 
Posts: 1864 | Location: Western South Dakota | Registered: 05 January 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Schrodinger
posted Hide Post
If one is a real gun nut, nothing is more fun than ordering a custom gum from a gun maker. You agonize over minutiae.

20 years ago, I had Larry Brace (a gentleman’s gentleman) make a rifle for me. He had what I think was a “try stock”, a stock that made perfect dimensions for the individual. It covered length of pull, cast off and drop at comb and heel. I made the error of adjusting the stock while standing. Wasn’t Larry’s fault but mine. If I had thought about it, I would have recognized that virtually all my shooting was off sticks. The first season I used the rifle a group of bull elk streamed off this large hill in front of me, crossed the draw in the bottom and were climbing up the hill that I was sitting on and to my right. I’m a right handed shooter. I was sitting on a steep hillside. The wrestling around that I did in the snow, trying to get on the sticks and behind the scope with a 14 1/2 pull was not fun. I somehow managed to get an elk, but far from the largest.

My point is that I stock that fits in one position doesn’t fit in another
 
Posts: 8635 | Location: Oregon  | Registered: 03 June 2018Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Schrodinger
posted Hide Post
Another thing I’ve found is that I like the aesthetic appeal of a stock with little drop at the heel, but when I mount the rifle, the top of the butt sticks two inches above my shoulder pocket. I guess the answer is a Monte Carlo stock.
 
Posts: 8635 | Location: Oregon  | Registered: 03 June 2018Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Big Wonderful Wyoming
posted Hide Post
Oscar from GRS has said it and I agree that when you point at something your hand turns slightly with your thumb and middle finger kind of on the same plane. This is the way GRS stocks are designed. With a palm off set turned the same way your hand turns.

When you shoot an open wristed classic stock your hand twist. For me this is uncomfortable. More importantly it is a weaker grip on the stock. In a bigger caliber to me it is brutal.

If you look at vertical grip stocks like the McMillan and Manners tactical stocks, the old Harry Lawson designs, and some of the 1960's California stocks they have similar geomtry.

I am a shooter and a hunter, a stock that drops shootability for me isn't much of a stock. Even if I have to carry another pound or two.
 
Posts: 7782 | Location: Das heimat! | Registered: 10 October 2012Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Interesting. Can you provide the physiologic and biomechanical support for this information. I would like to see the research on this theory. Or a link to GRS research would be useful. Thanks.
 
Posts: 1197 | Location: Wyoming | Registered: 04 April 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of bluefish
posted Hide Post
With an open grip it kinks the top of my wrist down. In a more closed grip stock my wrist remains straight. This gives me a better grip.
 
Posts: 5232 | Location: The way life should be | Registered: 24 May 2012Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Schrodinger
posted Hide Post
Bluefish, your observation seem logical, yet why are the great English shotguns made with no grip or a open grip?
 
Posts: 8635 | Location: Oregon  | Registered: 03 June 2018Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by gunmaker:
I build most all my stocks so the nose of the comb just clears the cocking piece. How much higher can you go?

The drop at heel depends on what type of sighting.

Shooting a straight comb stock is kind of like trying to shoot an AR flattop with low rings. Trying to squeeze your cheek bones on the comb while canting your head sideways with only the toe of the stock on your shoulder.

There's better ways to design a stock.

Many "modern" designs have been pushed where they are by gunwriters. And I'm not talking writers like Turpin and Carmichel who have actually stocked several rifles.

Don't forget some cast in the design. Only problem there is you can't pull a right and left stock out of the same mold.

I don't have anything against people spending time shooting off the bags at the bench or over the hood (where legal). Stalking rifle designs with their slim forends and open grips are not as easy to shoot tiny groups with. But they are more delightful to carry all day.

I would guess there are many more shooters today than hunters influencing stock design. ESPECIALLY in the synthetic world. Not a bad thing, just a thing.

Jerry built stalking rifles.

If you spend all day in an elevated blind, his style might not be for you.


Excellent reply Mr Gunmaker.
Thanks for the banter.

Zeke
 
Posts: 2270 | Registered: 27 October 2011Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Big Wonderful Wyoming
posted Hide Post
 
Posts: 7782 | Location: Das heimat! | Registered: 10 October 2012Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Schrodinger:
Another thing I’ve found is that I like the aesthetic appeal of a stock with little drop at the heel, but when I mount the rifle, the top of the butt sticks two inches above my shoulder pocket. I guess the answer is a Monte Carlo stock.


That is what I believe. One day, several years ago, I was visiting with Martin Hagn and we were discussing stocks. Martin makes straight, open gripped stock and they are beautiful stocks. However, he confessed to liking Monte Carlo stocks because they fit well. He also wondered about the shape of the butt and said he felt stocks were the way they were for the sake of appearance. Nonetheless, he makes stocks the way people expect him to make them.
When I make stocks for my own silhouette rifles, I am free to do whatever I want, within the constraints of the rules. I can twist the grip a little, I can kick the toe out a little, I can have 7 inches of drop at the toe. When everything is just right, I shoot just as badly as ever but feel really comfortable doing it!
A hunting stock is much the same but without the freestyle component. I try to stay within accepted styling for these but I do like Monte Carlo combs. By the way, I'm not a stockmaker like the real stockmakers. I'm just a gunsmith who makes the occasional stock. Regards, Bill
 
Posts: 3857 | Location: Elko, B.C. Canada | Registered: 19 June 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
THE ERGONOMICS
Ergonomics deals with the application of physiological principles to the engineering and design of a product. In GRS, we looked at the human act of shooting in different positions and started from that fundamental point to develop our stocks in ways that would accommodate human physiology. When you lay your shooting arm on a flat surface, you will notice that your hand will be naturally angled - we used that 6º angle as starting point to develop the shape and angle of our GRS grip.

Posted from the GRS site. Not really sure what this has to do with shooting from field positions or which 'angle, they are talking about. Sorry but not relevent to JF stock design- he built hunting rifles. Finding a flat surface in the field- good luck with that.
 
Posts: 1197 | Location: Wyoming | Registered: 04 April 2009Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I appreciate Jerry Fishers stocks, true American classic, and thats a nice design..

However I like English/German cross, I like low combs and use both irons and scope with them without a problem..Guess I was blessed with the old mod 70s with low combs and later came Bill Weaver and the 2.5X and we all got one free, and we never knew better, still killed game and that has never changed..The human body can adjust to about any style of stock if he will just shoot and hunt with it!! sofa some don't know that! rotflmo


Ray Atkinson
Atkinson Hunting Adventures
10 Ward Lane,
Filer, Idaho, 83328
208-731-4120

rayatkinsonhunting@gmail.com
 
Posts: 42299 | Location: Twin Falls, Idaho | Registered: 04 June 2000Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Custom Built Rifles    Has the Jerry Fisher style of stock fallen out of favor?

Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia