THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM CUSTOM RIFLE FORUM

Page 1 2 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Best Take Down System?
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I like the takedown handiness of travel but I also like the niftiness of a switchbarrel.

I intend to fit a second barrel to my takedown.

If I can't read ammo boxes and cartridge designations on guns perhaps I shouldn't be out there with a gun.

When it comes to being caught with the wrong barrel in the rifle I think it would be a wise thing to carry your switch barrel with the barrel of the calibre that will handle anything I could encounter.

That way you can only be overgunned on the little stuff.

My takedown travels taken down in a soft gunbag folded in half in the middle of my suitcase/duffel bag. That gives it plenty of protection from surrounding clothes.
 
Posts: 348 | Location: queensland, australia | Registered: 07 August 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Reading other posts.

I agree that a takedown case would be no lighter than an equivalent "one piece rifle" case. However a switch barrel case would be lighter due to the lack of the additional action and stock of the second rifle.

With baggage costs the way they are they're all too heavy.

The takedown/switch barrel case could be made shorter and therefore more manueverable in taxis, hotel foyers, small planes etc than the big double (two) rifle case.
 
Posts: 348 | Location: queensland, australia | Registered: 07 August 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of yumastepside
posted Hide Post
Does anyone have a pic of the H&H take-down set up where the barrelled action is removed from the stock and the floorplate/trigger guard stays ?? I'm trying to see how they hold the floorplate in to the stock. I assume it is a couple of screws and the action still uses the original fore and aft bolts.
My 8-06 RCBS has a shotgun trigger guard fitted, so it is already attached to the stock and I thought this might be a good candidate for this type of take-down.

Roger
 
Posts: 1054 | Location: Was NSW, now Tas Australia | Registered: 27 June 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Roger,
Here is a link to the website of Dorleac & Dorleac Gunmakers in France. If the link works it should take you to a page showing the build of a take down Mauser with the Holland & Holland system.
http://www.dorleac-dorleac.com...ifle-7mm-rm/?lang=en

The rear portion of the top Tang seems to be the key to the system. It remains in place to lock the bottom metal into the stock.

What I would like to know is how the front guard screw is held captive with the bottom metal once the gun has been taken down ? Must be via a bushing or nut to keep it from falling out ? I would enjoy hearing from someone who owns or has handled one.

Wyatt
 
Posts: 239 | Location: Southeast USA | Registered: 01 August 2014Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
The H&H take down I took apart had the front guard screw held in place with a small pin through the screw.....simple.
 
Posts: 3770 | Location: Boulder Colorado | Registered: 27 February 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Yes , very simple.... One of those things so simple I end up saying " why the #$@/ didn't I think of that " !

Thanks for the info Steve. Somehow I knew when we started talking Holland & Holland you would show up !

Wyatt
 
Posts: 239 | Location: Southeast USA | Registered: 01 August 2014Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of richj
posted Hide Post
reminds me of an M1 Carbine
 
Posts: 6547 | Location: NY, NY | Registered: 28 November 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I just sent you a bunch of pictures of the H&H take apart system Wyatt.
 
Posts: 3770 | Location: Boulder Colorado | Registered: 27 February 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Steve thanks for sending the pictures. I Always enjoy good pictures for future reference.

Compared to a standard Mauser, the head of the front guard screw on the Holland system is larger and with more of a rounded/dome shape. I assume this was an effort to make the screw slot more substantial and hold up better after being turned in and out when the gun is taken down....

Wyatt
 
Posts: 239 | Location: Southeast USA | Registered: 01 August 2014Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
No "tool" needed was the idea......perfect fit fir and English penny of the day.
 
Posts: 3770 | Location: Boulder Colorado | Registered: 27 February 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I've asked this before without an answer but will try again.
What would be the expected cost of converting to an H and H takedown system? Thanks.
 
Posts: 1070 | Registered: 02 April 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I can't answer your question on the cost. Maybe if you contacted Duane or Steve they could give you an estimate.

However I will go out on limb and say that most of the skilled Gunmakers capable of doing such work would probably only consider it as a complete build. Not just a conversion.

Wyatt
 
Posts: 239 | Location: Southeast USA | Registered: 01 August 2014Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of yumastepside
posted Hide Post
SKB, Steve, any chance of getting a copy of those pics ?......if you prefer, I can PM you my email address.

Roger
 
Posts: 1054 | Location: Was NSW, now Tas Australia | Registered: 27 June 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Thirdbite....I'll build you a custom but not interested in a retro fit. I have too many money loosing jobs on the bench already.


Sure Roger send me your email addy. It really is quite simple once you see it.
 
Posts: 3770 | Location: Boulder Colorado | Registered: 27 February 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
[QUOTE

What I would like to know is how the front guard screw is held captive with the bottom metal once the gun has been taken down ? Must be via a bushing or nut to keep it from falling out ? I would enjoy hearing from someone who owns or has handled one.

Wyatt[/QUOTE]

An easy way of retaining a screw like you describe is for the hole it goes through to be threaded the same pitch as the screw. The screw doesn't have threads for a certain distance from the head to the end of the threaded "bushing" or floorplate boss. The screw is threaded in until the thread runs out. Now you can't just pull it back out and it won't thread in any further until the action is brought in. Hope that makes sense. We use the same technique at work on customer accessible panels and parts that are removed and we don't want the screws getting lost. They stay with the part.
 
Posts: 714 | Location: Milwaukee, Wisconsin | Registered: 09 October 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Gzig5 , thanks for posting that info. Not being a machinist or engineer by trade I sometimes get stuck thinking about these things that are downright simple.

Wyatt
 
Posts: 239 | Location: Southeast USA | Registered: 01 August 2014Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I've handled a few riles with this system..they all had plenty of years on them and the upon "tightening" the front guard screw, the floorplates went beyond battery and has to be swung back (loosening the screw in the process)

The last one I did used an allen head screw captured as described above. A wrench went into the trap door grip cap.

I don't like to rely on tools for a TD system. but this was a reasonable compromise
 
Posts: 3673 | Location: Phone: (253) 535-0066 / (253) 230-5599, Address: PO Box 822 Spanaway WA 98387 | www.customgunandrifle.com | Registered: 16 April 2013Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
While I appreciate the cleverness and the craftsmanship required to make a takedown rifle, I question the real world practicality of it all. They are generally made for a "traveling rifle". Who, after flying halfway around the world, or across the continent, doesn't test fire/confirm zero once they arrive at the hunt location? In which case, you may as well just pull the action out of the stock, and you have a compact package for free. All it takes is the basic tools which you should have with you anyway. If you do a good bedding job, and re-assemble in a consistent manner, your zero is going to be pretty dang close anyway.

Jeff
 
Posts: 144 | Registered: 17 December 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of McKay
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by akjeff:
While I appreciate the cleverness and the craftsmanship required to make a takedown rifle, I question the real world practicality of it all. They are generally made for a "traveling rifle". Who, after flying halfway around the world, or across the continent, doesn't test fire/confirm zero once they arrive at the hunt location? In which case, you may as well just pull the action out of the stock, and you have a compact package for free. All it takes is the basic tools which you should have with you anyway. If you do a good bedding job, and re-assemble in a consistent manner, your zero is going to be pretty dang close anyway.

Jeff


I’ve got some bolt take-downs. Downside of taking barreled action out of the stock is it is not as short for traveling. And tools needdd. I have not traveled with a long case now since I think about 2008. So much nicer.


Mac

 
Posts: 1747 | Location: Salt Lake City, UT | Registered: 01 February 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
A real take down would definitely make for a more compact package Mac, no argument from me there. My redneck take down's fit into a case that's handy enough for my needs. The only tool required is a hollow handle screwdriver with tips for every fastener on my rifle, which I would have with me no matter what. Lots of ways to skin a cat.

Jeff
 
Posts: 144 | Registered: 17 December 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I have had a few take-down rifles over the time and realize everytime I really don´t need to take anything apart. The only real takedown rifle I would see come in handy would be a doublerifle which is shorter to begin with and even shorter when taken down.


DRSS: HQ Scandinavia. Chapters in Sweden & Norway
 
Posts: 2805 | Location: Denmark | Registered: 09 June 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
That is why. Wanted a small package for travelling and not a long case


And that is how:


Realized by H&W .
Interrupted trapezoidal threads,Cal.416 Rigby and .300 H&H , therefore the second bolt.
 
Posts: 230 | Location: Germany | Registered: 02 December 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Can you tell us about what that package weighs?
 
Posts: 3673 | Location: Phone: (253) 535-0066 / (253) 230-5599, Address: PO Box 822 Spanaway WA 98387 | www.customgunandrifle.com | Registered: 16 April 2013Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of yumastepside
posted Hide Post
I remember reading somewhere about a normal screw-in barrel type of take-down that had a small taper cut into the receiver and a matching male taper machined behind the barrel thread to help align the two when screwed back together.
Has anyone seen or heard of this and is it of any advantage ?.......anyone got any pics ??

Roger
 
Posts: 1054 | Location: Was NSW, now Tas Australia | Registered: 27 June 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Duane Wiebe (CG&R):
Can you tell us about what that package weighs?

5,9 Kg without scopes.
 
Posts: 230 | Location: Germany | Registered: 02 December 2009Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia