THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM CUSTOM RIFLE FORUM

Page 1 2 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
help me pick a caliber
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted
Rifle:skeletonized mauser action, featherweight barrel, and kevlar stock

Use:
deer and the occasional colorado elk

choices:
6mm Rem
257 Roberts
6.5x55

Other info:
I hope to keep the finished weight of the rifle including scope to 6 pounds.
while i am not recoil sensitive to the degree some are, I tend to avoid it. I shoot a 470 NE on a regular basis but it is not my favorite. I had a 300 RUM that was a bit much and a friend made me an offer so it is gone. My current deer rifle is a 223 varmint rifle.
 
Posts: 114 | Registered: 17 November 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
6.5x55, by all means!
Regards, Joe


__________________________
You can lead a human to logic but you can't make him think.
NRA Life since 1976. God bless America!
 
Posts: 2756 | Location: deep South | Registered: 09 December 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
6.5 x 55

The reason being it is easy on recoil, kills better than you would believe, and it is an accurate cartridge. The only downside is you don't have the assortment of bullets you would have if you were shooting a 308 caliber or a 6 mm caliber.

AKMatt
 
Posts: 374 | Location: Anchorage AK | Registered: 26 April 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
FinnAagaard called the 6.5x55 the perfect deer rifle.I used mine for 25 years and have to agree.
That really is with real loads not the wimpy ones today.
A good 140Gr at 2750-2800 fps is great.
While it is often stated that in Sweden it's used for moose , remember that the moose their are smaller than ours and only SOME of the loads are permissible.Use a premium like Nosler ,TSX ,etc.
 
Posts: 7636 | Registered: 10 October 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Both deer and elk hunting can require shots a t 200yds and beyond so I would go with a 300WM.The 300WM is the king of practical, real life, North American cartridges,IMO.
 
Posts: 11651 | Location: Montreal | Registered: 07 November 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Are you going to hunt where you live?
Or are you are going to travel and lay out
big money for these deer and occasional elk?
If you're hunting in your local area you can
be pickier about what shot you'll take; so
you can opt for a smaller cal. But if you're
a traveling hunter and you are on your last
day of your hunt and see a shooter but the
only angle you have is from dead behind you
want the power to take that shot and know
that you will get that bullet into the chest,
heart/lungs.



Jack

OH GOD! {Seriously, we need the help.}

 
Posts: 2791 | Location: USA - East Coast | Registered: 10 December 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by BigFiveJack:
Are you going to hunt where you live?
Or are you are going to travel and lay out
big money for these deer and occasional elk?
If you're hunting in your local area you can
be pickier about what shot you'll take; so
you can opt for a smaller cal. But if you're
a traveling hunter and you are on your last
day of your hunt and see a shooter but the
only angle you have is from dead behind you
want the power to take that shot and know
that you will get that bullet into the chest,
heart/lungs.


Great questions. I'll see if my answers will help any.
For deer, i will hunt where i live. I use my 223 for neck shots on deer and 60 grain partitions for shoulder shots. If presented with a "texas heart shot" I take the back of the neck/head every time. I took 2 that way this year. One was feeding away from me and would not pick her head up. I shot between her front feet, through the bottom jaw and out the top of her head. The other one was to the back of the neck.
 
Posts: 114 | Registered: 17 November 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
The deer and elk must be small in your neck of the woods.
 
Posts: 11651 | Location: Montreal | Registered: 07 November 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Or he knows his rifle and his game--

and uses a scope-

to answer the OP 6.5x55, great cartridge with lots of versatility.

SSR
 
Posts: 6725 | Location: central Texas | Registered: 05 August 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
6,5 too small. Elk laugh loudly when see you.
 
Posts: 66 | Location: HELL WARMED OVER | Registered: 26 June 2011Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of cmfic1
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by BUFFOOLIO:
6,5 too small. Elk laugh loudly when see you.


Are you being for real?

I'd have no issues at all using a 6.5 Swede on an Elk at most any huntable distance. Its not what I would choose, but I'd make it work if I had to.


Rod

--------------------------------
"A hunter should not choose the cal, cartridge, and bullet that will kill an animal when everything is right; rather, he should choose ones that will kill the most efficiently when everything goes wrong"
Bob Hagel
 
Posts: 977 | Location: Alberta, Canada. | Registered: 10 May 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
6.5x55. My favorite caliber...
 
Posts: 772 | Registered: 09 June 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Michael Robinson
posted Hide Post
All are too small for my tastes, so I'd go with the 6.5x55mm if forced to choose.


Mike

Wilderness is my cathedral, and hunting is my prayer.
 
Posts: 13825 | Location: New England | Registered: 06 June 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Let's see,

help you pick a caliber.

Glad to.
Here goes

Take your choices, write each down on separate small pieces of paper. One chambering per piece of paper. Put paper slips in hat. Hold hat over head. Pick out a piece of paper. If what you get is not what you want, keep picking out pieces of paper till you get what you want.

Best

GWB
 
Posts: 23752 | Location: Pearland, Tx,, USA | Registered: 10 September 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of TC1
posted Hide Post
Add 7X57 to your list then pick it.

Problem solved.

Terry


--------------------------------------------

Well, other than that Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?
 
Posts: 6315 | Location: Mississippi | Registered: 18 May 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
why stop there,
How bout an 8 x 57

or even

a 9.3


Best


GWB
 
Posts: 23752 | Location: Pearland, Tx,, USA | Registered: 10 September 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of ramrod340
posted Hide Post
quote:
Add 7X57 to your list then pick it.

Problem solved

+1
The wife uses one for all her hunting elk and Africa. My second choice out of your list is the 6.5x55.


As usual just my $.02
Paul K
 
Posts: 12881 | Location: Mexico, MO | Registered: 02 April 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of loud-n-boomer
posted Hide Post
Given your choices and that elk is part of the equasion I'd opt for the 6.5x55 with a fast twist barrel to stabilize 140-grain Nosler Partitions or Barnes TSX bullets. In my opinion, the 6mm is too small to reliably kill elk quickly short of a shot disrupting the central nervous system, meaning you could be in for a very long follow-up even with a double lung shot. The .257 Roberts is one of my favorite rounds, and is a better killer of large game than the 6mm. However, the 6.5 is more versatile than the 6mm or the .257, offers a great variety of bullets, and with the correct bullets has better penetration than the other two choices.

Dave


One morning I shot an elephant in my pajamas. How he got into my pajamas I'll never know. - Groucho Marx
 
Posts: 3866 | Location: Eastern Slope, Colorado, USA | Registered: 01 March 2001Reply With Quote
new member
posted Hide Post
I live next door in Utah and I've hunted deer and elk extensively with both the 6.5x55 and the 7x57. The 6.5x55 will work fine on both of these animals - especially with good 140 grain bullets. Sounds like a cool rifle you are putting together.
 
Posts: 16 | Location: The mountains of Utah | Registered: 16 June 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Austin Hunter
posted Hide Post
If you are using a standard length Mauser action I'd go with a 280 AI. It gives you more powder capacity than the others and a wide selection of 7mm bullets.

Or try something different and go with a 6.5mm-06


"Evil is powerless if the good are unafraid" -- Ronald Reagan

"Ignorance of The People gives strength to totalitarians."

Want to make just about anything work better? Keep the government as far away from it as possible, then step back and behold the wonderment and goodness.
 
Posts: 3084 | Location: Austin, Texas | Registered: 05 April 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Why not add the 270 to the mix? I've used a 270 on quite a few moose and never was disappointed. Lung shots on moose or elk with a 270 produce dead animals every time.
 
Posts: 1078 | Registered: 03 April 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Within your parameters, I would choose the 6.5x55. My Sweed shoots inch groups with iron sites, 130gr Nosler Accubonds, and a max load of H4831. Although I'm confident I could take an Elk with it, it would not be my first choice.
 
Posts: 3034 | Location: Colorado | Registered: 01 July 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of JabaliHunter
posted Hide Post
Of the choices, definitely 6.5x55
Look at the 140 Nosler Partition and 130 or 140 Accubonds...
 
Posts: 712 | Location: England | Registered: 01 January 2010Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of wildcat junkie
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Rine Everett:
Rifle:skeletonized mauser action, featherweight barrel, and kevlar stock

Use:
deer and the occasional colorado elk

choices:
6mm Rem
257 Roberts

6.5x55
.


All three are on my "short list" for a lightweight Mauser sporter, along W/the parent cartridge for 2 of them, a 7X57.


GOOGLE HOTLINK FIX FOR BLOCKED PHOTOBUCKET IMAGES https://chrome.google.com/webs...inkfix=1516144253810
 
Posts: 2440 | Location: Northern New York, WAY NORTH | Registered: 04 March 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Rine
I would suggest that you take up skeet shooting.
Given enough rounds of skeet you would learn to forget the recoil so you would not have to live with a .223 being your current deer rifle...........................................
The calibers on your list are fair to very good deer cartridges. Only the 6.5X55 would be considered a reasonable elk rifle at some distance. And distance matters. With any of the calibers you can hit an elk at much greater distance than you have effective energy.
 
Posts: 13978 | Location: http://www.tarawaontheweb.org/tarawa2.jpg | Registered: 03 December 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by SR4759:
Rine
I would suggest that you take up skeet shooting.


Yep, a few hundred rounds a weekend with a 5 1/2lb 12 guage with no recoil pad eliminated most my recoil issues.
Don
 
Posts: 1087 | Location: Detroit MI | Registered: 28 March 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Mighty Peace
posted Hide Post
Of the ones you listed, the 6.5x55 gets my vote.

Been hearing/seeing postings on a 6.5 Creedmour or somethinh like that.
 
Posts: 431 | Location: Alberta | Registered: 02 May 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of GSSP
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Matt Moore:
6.5 x 55

The only downside is you don't have the assortment of bullets you would have if you were shooting a 308 caliber or a 6 mm caliber.

AKMatt


PLEASE tell me you're kidding? Their are more than enough quality, C&C and premium, 6.5mm bullets on the market!

Alan
 
Posts: 1719 | Location: Utah | Registered: 01 June 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of CZ 550
posted Hide Post
I think a 7x57 would be perfect.


When you need it and don't have it you'll be singing a different tune.
 
Posts: 477 | Location: Olyphant Pennsylvania | Registered: 05 September 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Out of those the 6.5x55 without a doubt.
 
Posts: 1173 | Registered: 14 June 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of HankinColorado
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by boltman:
Out of those the 6.5x55 without a doubt.



Yup, no question about it...


Life, it's good...
 
Posts: 225 | Location: Colorado Springs USA | Registered: 23 July 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of DuggaBoye
posted Hide Post
6.5 from your options or-

7x57 or-

308


DuggaBoye-O
NRA-Life
Whittington-Life
TSRA-Life
DRSS
DSC
HSC
SCI
 
Posts: 4594 | Location: TX | Registered: 03 March 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Crazyhorseconsulting
posted Hide Post
quote:
Both deer and elk hunting can require shots a t 200yds and beyond so I would go with a 300WM.The 300WM is the king of practical, real life, North American cartridges,IMO.



That was NOT one of the choices, I would go with the 375 H&H. That was not one of the choices, neither was the 7x57 or 308.

Of the choices listed the 6.5x55 is the best.

Why the hell can't people stick to the parameters listed??????


Even the rocks don't last forever.



 
Posts: 31014 | Location: Olney, Texas | Registered: 27 March 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Crazyhorseconsulting
posted Hide Post
Sorry to have killed your thread Rine, my apologies.

I just have a hard time understanding why, people cannot stick witin the parameters outlined by someone when they ask a question such as yours.

You listed 3 specific calibers and folks went to listing their pets. Yes I love the 375 and the 35 Whelen, but those were not choices.

If no calibers had been listed, that is one thing, but when specifics are asked, why go off on a tangent.

I think you will enjoy whatever you choose to chamber the rifle for.


Even the rocks don't last forever.



 
Posts: 31014 | Location: Olney, Texas | Registered: 27 March 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
SR4759; i am not living with the 223 as my deer rifle, i choose it because it will do what i need it to do 100 % of the time. With a 60 nosler partition, i can shoot through and through a 200 lb whitetail deer shoulders, with a 55 gr balistic tip, I can place a bullet into the neck or head of a deer and not have to track, follow, or chase it down. If I wish to be greedy, I can and have shot 2 deer in the neck with a 60 gr partition and recovered both deer laying side by side. Heck, my cousin shot 2 smallish does in the shoulder with a 60 partition and got a 2 fer. I think he was showing off because i did it last year. We didn't recover that bullet.

Crazyhourse, no problem, they where starting to get off topic. I'm actually going to take one persons advice... Geedubya. But, with a twist. Im going to write down everyones suggestion, but for each suggestion of a larger caliber, i will take one away from the largest caliber. Hey, my gun, my rules. Then I will add in my choices 3 for first choice 2 for 2nd and 1 for third.
1 6mm
2 257
3 6.5x55

15 x 6.5x55
1 257
1 6mm
-8 from the 6.5x55 for the naysayers who wanted me to go bigger
+3 6mm
+2 257
+1 6.5x55
----------
TOTAL
8 6.5x55
3 257
4 6mm
I will draw in a few minutes and let you know...
 
Posts: 114 | Registered: 17 November 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of thecanadian
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Rine Everett:
SR4759; i am not living with the 223 as my deer rifle, i choose it because it will do what i need it to do 100 % of the time. With a 60 nosler partition, i can shoot through and through a 200 lb whitetail deer shoulders, with a 55 gr balistic tip, I can place a bullet into the neck or head of a deer and not have to track, follow, or chase it down. If I wish to be greedy, I can and have shot 2 deer in the neck with a 60 gr partition and recovered both deer laying side by side. Heck, my cousin shot 2 smallish does in the shoulder with a 60 partition and got a 2 fer. I think he was showing off because i did it last year. We didn't recover that bullet.



+1
My wife uses a .223 and has always killed them just as fast with 60gr partitions as me shooting them with my 7mm-08


"though the will of the majority is in all cases to prevail, that will to be rightful must be reasonable; that the minority possess their equal rights, which equal law must protect, and to violate would be oppression."

---Thomas Jefferson
 
Posts: 1093 | Location: Eau Claire, WI | Registered: 20 January 2011Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Well, it was the 6.5x55. Now to order the barrel.
 
Posts: 114 | Registered: 17 November 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Crazyhorseconsulting
posted Hide Post
quote:
Well, it was the 6.5x55. Now to order the barrel.


Congratulations, be sure to post up pics when it is finished.


Even the rocks don't last forever.



 
Posts: 31014 | Location: Olney, Texas | Registered: 27 March 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
P.S. I don't know why there are comments about the 6.5x55 being so under-powered. The 125 gr Nosler partition will exceed the factory 7mm Rem. Mag. 140 gr velocity by 100 fps, +/- 100 fps. With the same BC. That's only 10% less power than the most popular load for the 7mm Rem. Mag. (7mm Rem factory 140s only crono at 2,900 fps.)
I shoot 100 gr in mine at only 2,800 fps for deer. That matches factory .243 power.
 
Posts: 149 | Registered: 17 January 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of vapodog
posted Hide Post
quote:
choices:
6mm Rem
257 Roberts
6.5x55

Adding the occasional elk.....the 6.5 X 55 is the better option......but all three are excellent deer cartridges.


///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."
Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 28849 | Location: western Nebraska | Registered: 27 May 2003Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia