THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM MILITARY FORUM

Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Military Mauser question
 Login/Join
 
Moderator

Picture of Mark
posted
Dunno if I am going to go this route, but I'd like some suggestions from you mauser gurus:

I'm going to build a 375 H&H on a mauser, I want the action to be manufactured in the 20's or 30's.

What actions do you recommend me to look for?

Right now I'm putting together a 20 tactical so I'm in no hurry, but would like to have an idea what to look for.

Thanks!

Mark
 
Posts: 7786 | Location: Between 2 rivers, Middle USA | Registered: 19 August 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
My suggestion at this point with "old" mauser actions, is to find one that someone has already converted from it's military configuration and not chop up one of the slowly diminishing "pile".

Workmanship wise, the Persian Mausers built by BRNO are just about the nicest Military Mauser action ever built.

Good luck!
 
Posts: 324 | Location: Fairbanks Alaska USA | Registered: 10 June 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of JBabcock
posted Hide Post
I know where there is a 375 H&H in a barreled, magnum length Commercial FN action, the kind with the slot on the front ring, if your interested. You'll be money ahead if you go that route.
 
Posts: 611 | Registered: 18 December 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of bartsche
posted Hide Post
The only way that I know of to use a military Mauser( That's what forum we're in, military) to make into a .375 H&H Mag. is to start by installing a single shot follower.Most any of the large ring 98 type will do just fine.
 
Posts: 10226 | Location: Temple City CA | Registered: 29 April 2003Reply With Quote
Moderator

Picture of Mark
posted Hide Post
bartsche,
I am planning on opening it up myself to accept the longer cartridge. What I was wondering from you guys who know the military models is what action to be on the lookout for. I am wanting something manufactured in the 20's-30's era. Prefer an action with a nicer finish so I don't have to surface grind everything, but date of manufacture is more important at this point.

I'm dumb as dirt about Siamese mausers, except I only seem to see them in 45-70 and maybe there is a reason for that, anyone know?

Thanks,

Mark
 
Posts: 7786 | Location: Between 2 rivers, Middle USA | Registered: 19 August 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of cummins cowboy
posted Hide Post
If set on a military mauser action, go down to your local big 5 sporting goods, and buy one of their 69$ vz 24's. but beware I considered a mauser sporter myself and found that even with the cheap stuff you would prolly be better off with buying a commercial manufactured gun, but if you are wanting to play around and do something yourself it might not be a bad idea, oh yeah if you find one of those persians mentioned above, those are way too nice to chop up.
 
Posts: 1755 | Location: slc Ut | Registered: 22 December 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of bartsche
posted Hide Post
Mark White,
I certainly respect a man's toys. If you are going to enjoy all that work more power to you.I suggested the follower approach because I have made a number of long wildcats that are made on Mausers using the single shot follower.
I think there are still some good looking VZ 24s floating around. I'd be interested to see some in process and final photos if you've a mind to share. Roger
 
Posts: 10226 | Location: Temple City CA | Registered: 29 April 2003Reply With Quote
Moderator

Picture of Mark
posted Hide Post
What were the years of manufacture for the vz 24?

Thanks!

Mark

P.S. Roger that is a good idea about the follower, BTW.
 
Posts: 7786 | Location: Between 2 rivers, Middle USA | Registered: 19 August 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
The vz24 was made from about 1923 to about 1940.

Many don't consider opening a 98 action to H&H sized cases a wise conversion.
 
Posts: 158 | Registered: 22 June 2003Reply With Quote
Moderator

Picture of Mark
posted Hide Post
The safety issues are usually when too much is cut away in the front. If you remove metal from both the front and the back you can get the length without jeopardizing the lugs.

It is time consuming though.
 
Posts: 7786 | Location: Between 2 rivers, Middle USA | Registered: 19 August 2000Reply With Quote
<eldeguello>
posted
Find an FN M1924 like the 7X57mm's the Venezuelan government used. They are excellent, as well-made of good steel and properly heat-treated as any Mauser ever made! [Big Grin]
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
eldeguello,

The action you are talking about albeit a good one happens to be an intermediate length action. That would require so much metal removal that I doubt it could be used.

As Markwhite pointed out, the standard action may be ok to use as long as the metalsmith knows to open to the rear. I doubt that the intermediate action can accomodate the long H&H case.
 
Posts: 158 | Registered: 22 June 2003Reply With Quote
<'Trapper'>
posted
This is not what you are asking about but have you considered using the WSM and opening it up to .375? I don't know the true case capacity of the 375 H&H vs the WSM but look at this:
"Just last year Winchester developed its own unbelted case--but made it short enough to fit into short bolt actions. The initial result, the .300 WSM, uses a 2.1-inch case with a slightly rebated rim of .535 inches, and a base diameter of .550 inches. With a 35-degree shoulder and a relatively short neck, the case has only slightly less capacity than belted magnums based on the .375 H&H case cut down to fit into .30-06-length actions (nominally, a case length of 2.5 inches). In practice, the greater burning efficiency of the short, fat case makes up for the slight difference in powder capacity; the .300 WSM equals the .300 Win. Mag. in performance while burning about seven percent less propellant."
Would this hold true for the 375 on the WSM case as opposed to the 375 H&H? Again, I don't know but it sure seems to make a lot of sense. I know that Saeed sets a great deal of store by his 375/404 so this may well be worht a go.
Best regards,
 
Reply With Quote
Moderator

Picture of Mark
posted Hide Post
Trapper,

An interesting approach but my intent is to build a classic Rigby style rifle from the 20's-30's era. At first I was thinking about just chambering it in 416 Taylor (a lot less work for me!)but the more I thought about it the more sense it made to go the whole route and use the proper cartridge too. Other actions would also be easier to do, say a M70, but the fact is that virtually all the classic rifles werre built on mauser actions, so I guess I gotta do this one too that way or else when it is finished it will bug me whenever I look at it.

I am still curious about the Siamese mausers if anyone knows anything about them.

Thanks for the responses so far guys!

Mark
 
Posts: 7786 | Location: Between 2 rivers, Middle USA | Registered: 19 August 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Most of the Saimese Mausers were designed for a rimmed cartridge. This is the one the American public clamors for since it used to be common to convert these to .45-70. I would stick with a standard 98 action. Besides, the standard 98 action would certainly be more in keeping with the classic notion you have.
 
Posts: 158 | Registered: 22 June 2003Reply With Quote
Moderator

Picture of Mark
posted Hide Post
Thanks Zach, It was something I always wondered about, now I know!

Mark
 
Posts: 7786 | Location: Between 2 rivers, Middle USA | Registered: 19 August 2000Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia

 

image linking to 100 Top Hunting Sites