THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM MILITARY FORUM

Page 1 2 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Weapon problems in the military during closecombat
 Login/Join
 
one of us
Picture of TANSTAAFL
posted Hide Post
The problem isn't only that we've left true marksmanship training behind. Up until WWII that was the focus of military weapons training; the ability to shoot little groups at long distances. But the problem with that training was getting people to shoot at other people; some estimates say 80% of combatants under direct enemy fire/observation failed to actively take part in the fight.

Between WWII and VietNam our training methods changed, we gave up on true marksmanship and embraced field firing under the pressure of time and limited exposure. Coupled with human form targets (sometimes with faces and hands painted flesh color), this observe/ID/shoot training had wonderous effect; by the end of VietNam 90% of combatants were shooting at something during a fight.

What we gave up was the basis in true marksmanship, a skill that is the base for all weapons training once the ranges extend beyond 100m. Similarly the military has been very slow to adopt law enforcements findings that training is not complete until the task can be completed to standard under the (duplicated) stress of combat.

Again, it doesn't matter what our soldiers are shooting. We need to train them to consistently hit targets that don't want to be hit, that are exposed for fleeting moments at unknown distances, and all of this while being shot at. Not very easy to train for....

Once that is done we can then determine if our cartridge/weapon combo is up to the task.

Bob


"This country, this world, the [human] race of which you and I are a part, is great at having consensuses that are in great error." Rep. John Dingell (D-MI)
 
Posts: 361 | Location: Stevens Point, WI, USA | Registered: 20 June 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Arminius
posted Hide Post
Whats with 5.56 Mk 262 and Mk 262 A 1?

IIRC they use SMK or OTM bullets in the 5.56? Weight - not sure.

( also IIRC the Israelis make an excellent 5.59, 55 grs OTM load - wonder if they use it as a sniper load??? )

H


formerly, before software update, known as "aHunter", lost 1000 posts in a minute
 
Posts: 339 | Location: Middle Europe | Registered: 10 January 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Arminius:
Whats with 5.56 Mk 262 and Mk 262 A 1?

IIRC they use SMK or OTM bullets in the 5.56? Weight - not sure.

( also IIRC the Israelis make an excellent 5.59, 55 grs OTM load - wonder if they use it as a sniper load??? )

H


The Mk262 bullets use the 77gr. SMK (IIRC) also the Hornady version (same weight).

These are not great bullets for punching armor.
 
Posts: 49226 | Registered: 21 January 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Arminius
posted Hide Post
Sorry if that was not clear from my post:

I don´t want to punch armour.

But I like my bullets to be accurate and effective ...

H


formerly, before software update, known as "aHunter", lost 1000 posts in a minute
 
Posts: 339 | Location: Middle Europe | Registered: 10 January 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of El Deguello
posted Hide Post
Originally posted by Edmond:
quote:
My son’s company has five designated marksmen who carry M14’s.


That's the answer....


"Bitte, trinks du nicht das Wasser. Dahin haben die Kuhen gesheissen."
 
Posts: 4386 | Location: New Woodstock, Madison County, Central NY | Registered: 04 January 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by El Deguello:
Originally posted by Edmond:
quote:
My son’s company has five designated marksmen who carry M14’s.


That's the answer....


That’s my quote about the M-14’s and the only problem in reissuing those rifles is logistics and qualified armorers. The military doesn’t like having to supply ammunition and spare parts for lots of different weapons.

Most of the time my son’s guys have to use de-linked 7.62mm machine gun ammo for their M14’s because the boxed loose rounds are seldom in the supply chain. I had to send them extra magazines because they only issued one per man when they deployed.

Small arms occupy about the lowest rung on the priority ladder at the Pentagon and that doesn’t appear to be changing in the near future.
 
Posts: 4574 | Location: Valencia, California | Registered: 16 March 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by DaMan:
quote:
Originally posted by Arminius:
Whats with 5.56 Mk 262 and Mk 262 A 1?

IIRC they use SMK or OTM bullets in the 5.56? Weight - not sure.

( also IIRC the Israelis make an excellent 5.59, 55 grs OTM load - wonder if they use it as a sniper load??? )

H


The Mk262 bullets use the 77gr. SMK (IIRC) also the Hornady version (same weight).

These are not great bullets for punching armor.


Mk 260 Mod 0: Hornady 75 OTM

Mk 262 Mod 1: Sierra 77 OTM with cannelure
 
Posts: 985 | Registered: 06 February 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of RaySendero
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by SwiftShot:
There has been a little discussion going on in the military about the M 4 not having enough punch up close on bad hits to put them down and keep them there. The problem lies in the bullet selection. Full metal jackets punch nice holes but a lot of energy is lost into the backdrop. Plus with shorter barrel speed is lost. Suggestions for this have been 1 rapid expanding bullets ie ballistic tips, 2 changing the M 4 over to I believe it is 6.8 mm by like 44 or something, 3 going with the new rifle system under development by I think colt the X-8 either in 556 or 6.8 or the 4 M 14 conversion by like fulton armory and just hitting them with 308. Drawback to the cheap option is expanding bullets might be considered by some hippie freaks and the international communtiy as cruel and harsh. What do you guys think?

Link to Fulton Armory
http://www.fulton-armory.com/MARifles.htm



  • OTHER list: M1928A1


    ________
    Ray
  •  
    Posts: 1786 | Registered: 10 November 2004Reply With Quote
    One of Us
    posted Hide Post
    Perhaps they will get these to the guys in the field before too long.


    http://www.military.com/soldiertech/0,14632,Soldiertech_DREAD,,00.html

    Would be quite an improvement in humvee armament.

    BJB
     
    Posts: 514 | Location: now in Lower Slower Delaware | Registered: 21 June 2005Reply With Quote
    One of Us
    Picture of Steel Slinger
    posted Hide Post
    Like everyone has said before. You've got to hit it first. However... I just returned from Iraq, and I have seen my fair share of insurgents get up and run away after being hit with a 5.56. Those others that were hit with a 7.62 or a .50 went down immediately. I could post a couple of pics, but they're a little too gruesome. The military doesn't need a completely new piece of shit, aka the XM8. All they need to do is to replace the uppers on all the A2s and M4s with the 6.8, and dust off all of the M14s that are lying around in the vaults.

    Oh, and just to clear up the twist rate issue on the M4s... it's 1/9 people.


    FiSTers... Running is useless.
     
    Posts: 315 | Location: Fayetteville, Arkansas | Registered: 01 July 2005Reply With Quote
    one of us
    Picture of TANSTAAFL
    posted Hide Post
    Steel Slinger,
    Welcome back, where'd you hang out? I recently returned also, from the Mahmudiyah area.


    "This country, this world, the [human] race of which you and I are a part, is great at having consensuses that are in great error." Rep. John Dingell (D-MI)
     
    Posts: 361 | Location: Stevens Point, WI, USA | Registered: 20 June 2002Reply With Quote
    One of Us
    posted Hide Post
    quote:
    Originally posted by Steel Slinger:
    Like everyone has said before. You've got to hit it first. However... I just returned from Iraq, and I have seen my fair share of insurgents get up and run away after being hit with a 5.56. Those others that were hit with a 7.62 or a .50 went down immediately. I could post a couple of pics, but they're a little too gruesome. The military doesn't need a completely new piece of shit, aka the XM8. All they need to do is to replace the uppers on all the A2s and M4s with the 6.8, and dust off all of the M14s that are lying around in the vaults.

    Oh, and just to clear up the twist rate issue on the M4s... it's 1/9 people.


    Welcome home...and thank you for your service, you make all us old vets proud!

    My son is a SFC FISTer attached to the 3rd ID just south of Baghdad, his tour is up in January.
     
    Posts: 4574 | Location: Valencia, California | Registered: 16 March 2005Reply With Quote
    One of Us
    posted Hide Post
    quote:
    Originally posted by Steel Slinger:
    Oh, and just to clear up the twist rate issue on the M4s... it's 1/9 people.


    I beg to differ. EVERY M16A2, M16A4, and M4 ever made have a 1 in 7 rifling rate. Made so that they could stabilize the very long M856 tracer ammo.
     
    Posts: 985 | Registered: 06 February 2005Reply With Quote
    one of us
    Picture of TANSTAAFL
    posted Hide Post
    Rick,
    PM sent.


    "This country, this world, the [human] race of which you and I are a part, is great at having consensuses that are in great error." Rep. John Dingell (D-MI)
     
    Posts: 361 | Location: Stevens Point, WI, USA | Registered: 20 June 2002Reply With Quote
    One of Us
    posted Hide Post
    Bob,

    Got it...sent one back. Welcome home to you also, my friend!
     
    Posts: 4574 | Location: Valencia, California | Registered: 16 March 2005Reply With Quote
    One of Us
    posted Hide Post
    For whatever its worth, from the DOD website:

    M16A2

    Primary function: Infantry weapon
Manufacturer: Colt Manufacturing and Fabrique Nationale Manufacturing Inc.
Length: 39.63 inches (100.66 centimeters)
Weight, with 30 round magazine: 8.79 pounds (3.99 kilograms)
Bore diameter: 5.56mm (.233 inches)
Maximum effective range:
Area target: 2,624.8 feet (800 meters)
Point target: 1,804.5 feet (550 meters)
Muzzle velocity: 2,800 feet (853 meters) per second
Rate of fire:
Cyclic: 800 rounds per minute
Sustained: 12-15 rounds per minute
Semiautomatic: 45 rounds per minute
Burst: 90 rounds per minute
Magazine capacity: 30 rounds
Unit Replacement Cost: $586

Features: The M16A2 5.56mm rifle is a lightweight, air-cooled, gas-operated, magazine-fed, shoulder- or hip-fired weapon designed for either automatic fire (3-round bursts) or semiautomatic fire (single shot) through the use of a selector lever. The weapon has a fully adjustable rear sight. The bottom of the trigger guard opens to provide access to the trigger while wearing winter mittens. The upper receiver/barrel assembly has a fully adjustable rear sight and a compensator which helps keep the muzzle down during firing. The steel bolt group and barrel extension are designed with locking lugs which lock the bolt group to the barrel extension allowing the rifle to have a lightweight aluminum receiver.

Background: The M16A2 rifle is a product improvement of the M16A1 rifle. The improvements are:
    • heavier, stiffer barrel than the barrel of the M16A1;
    • redesigned handguard, using two identical halves, with a round contour which is sturdier and provides a better grip when holding the rifle;
    • new buttstock and pistol grip made of a tougher injection moldable plastic that provides much greater resistance to breakage;
    • improved rear sight which can be easily adjusted for windage and range;
    • modified upper receiver design to deflect ejected cartridges, and preclude the possibility of the ejected cartridges hitting the face of a left-handed firer;
    • burst control device, that limits the number of rounds fired in the automatic mode to three per trigger pull, which increases accuracy while reducing ammunition expenditure;
    • muzzle compensator, designed to reduce position disclosure and improve controllability and accuracy in both burst and rapid semi-automatic fire;
    • heavier barrel with a 1 in 7 twist to fire NATO standard SS 109 type (M855) ammunition which is also fired from the M249 Squad Automatic Weapon (SAW). This further increases the effective range and penetration of the rifle cartridge. The M16A2 will also shoot the older M193 ammunition designed for a 1 in 12 twist.
     
    Posts: 4574 | Location: Valencia, California | Registered: 16 March 2005Reply With Quote
    One of Us
    Picture of Steel Slinger
    posted Hide Post
    Gunny Bob,
    Thanks, it's good to see that you made it home too. I was in central Baghdad. I swear it is the nastiest place on earth.

    Rick,
    Hope your son makes it back safe. It's a long hellish year. Tell him I said Rock Hard.

    HP Shooter,
    I'm really not trying to fight with you or anyone else about this, but I just lugged my M4 around for about 15 months straight, and it is clearly stamped on the barrel, "5.56mm NATO 1/9 TWIST".


    FiSTers... Running is useless.
     
    Posts: 315 | Location: Fayetteville, Arkansas | Registered: 01 July 2005Reply With Quote
    One of Us
    posted Hide Post
    Steel,

    I will pass that along to him tonight, thanks. He shares your feelings about central Baghadad 100%.

    Again, welcome home and thank you for serving, your loved ones can sleep better now, and they’ve earned it, as have you!!
     
    Posts: 4574 | Location: Valencia, California | Registered: 16 March 2005Reply With Quote
      Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
     


    Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


    Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia

     

    image linking to 100 Top Hunting Sites