One of Us
| Thanks for that, I'd already looked at the Weaver site but it doesn't cover the BSA sporterised P14 specifically. The later models with rounded receivers, Monarch & CF2s, use the same blocks as Rem 700s do, so I reckon its probably these but I was hoping that someone who had done it might know or be able to give me the Weaver #s they've got. Our local guy doesn't carry much Weaver stock & I don't want to have to order them in & then find I've got the wrong ones. Steve. |
| Posts: 540 | Location: Nelson, New Zealand | Registered: 07 March 2008 | ![Reply With Quote Reply With Quote](https://forums.accuratereloading.com/groupee_common/ver1.3.7.2147483647/platform_images/blank.gif)
IP
|
|
One of Us
| |
| Posts: 6824 | Location: United Kingdom | Registered: 18 November 2007 | ![Reply With Quote Reply With Quote](https://forums.accuratereloading.com/groupee_common/ver1.3.7.2147483647/platform_images/blank.gif)
IP
|
|
One of Us
| Close but no cigar yet! I have however had a lovely prowl thru many an interesting post on these forums (forae?), always something new to learn. ![Smiler](https://forums.accuratereloading.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_smile.gif) Your mention of a P-H catalogue got me digging till I found mine. Its not old enough to feature to P14s etc but it does have relative heights of their mounting blocks & with some measuring & bit of sleuthing I might just crack my wee problem. Steve |
| Posts: 540 | Location: Nelson, New Zealand | Registered: 07 March 2008 | ![Reply With Quote Reply With Quote](https://forums.accuratereloading.com/groupee_common/ver1.3.7.2147483647/platform_images/blank.gif)
IP
|
|
One of Us
| Hi: I was advised to measure the distance between the holes in the receiver and then get Leupold adjustable bases and rings in case the holes are a little bit off center |
| Posts: 201 | Location: Mackenzie BC | Registered: 15 February 2005 | ![Reply With Quote Reply With Quote](https://forums.accuratereloading.com/groupee_common/ver1.3.7.2147483647/platform_images/blank.gif)
IP
|
|
one of us
| Shinzo I have one of the BSA P-17 in 30-06 which was contoured the same as your P-14. Mine has Weaver # 35 & # 36 bases on it . I have seen some rifles that appeared to be BSA's that had a little more material ground off the rear bridge. This resulted in the rear base being a few thousands of an inch lower than it should be.Check this with a straight edge from the front base. If this is the case a piece of shim stock under the rear base will correct this. |
| Posts: 2457 | Location: manitoba canada | Registered: 01 March 2001 | ![Reply With Quote Reply With Quote](https://forums.accuratereloading.com/groupee_common/ver1.3.7.2147483647/platform_images/blank.gif)
IP
|
|
One of Us
| Many thanks snowman, you've confirmed what I had basically been able to work out & I'm happy to say that my receiver measures spot on for the #35/36 bases, so I have now ordered some & will be keen to get them fitted up. I hadn't realised that BSA had done M17s as well, but it seems logical, I certainly enjoy my BSA, its a lot more than just a curiosity, it still gets to earn its keep. I've just ordered a stack of WW2 Dominion brass to use in it, its still the best brass around for 303s & in a front locking action like the P14 should last me for ages. Steve. |
| Posts: 540 | Location: Nelson, New Zealand | Registered: 07 March 2008 | ![Reply With Quote Reply With Quote](https://forums.accuratereloading.com/groupee_common/ver1.3.7.2147483647/platform_images/blank.gif)
IP
|
|