Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
One of Us |
Polar bear story Inuit angry over U.S. proposal to eliminate all trade in polar bears at 17:03 on October 16, 2009, EDT. Bob Weber, THE CANADIAN PRESS Canadian Inuit are outraged over a U.S. plan to use an international treaty to eliminate all trade in polar bears anywhere in the world. They say it would cripple one of their few industries and they're calling on the federal government to step in. "We're fighting with Goliath here," said Gabriel Nirlungyak, director of wildlife with Nunavut Tunngavik Inc., which oversees the Nunavut land claim. "We want our government to defend us." On Friday, Tom Strickland, the United States assistant secretary of the interior, released a proposal to the 175 countries which have signed the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species. It says polar bears should be moved to a classification that would outlaw all commercial trade in the animals. "The proposals submitted this week will improve protections for dozens of declining species, while improving enforcement and implementation of (the convention) for many others," Strickland said in a release. The bears are threatened by habitat loss due to melting sea ice caused by climate change, he said. Previous moves by the American government have already killed most of the market for U.S. sport hunters by preventing them from bringing hides back with them. If the current proposal is accepted at the convention's next meeting in March, it will wipe out all other markets, said Nirlungyak. "If this goes ahead, it will stop all sport hunts. It will be quite devastating." Sport hunters pay up to $30,000 for the opportunity of bagging one of the world's largest land predators and Inuit hunters can get up to $150 a foot for a bear hide. Nirlungyak said there's no evidence the animals are currently endangered and added that Canadian populations are well-managed. Canada has about two-thirds of the world's 25,000 bears. Nunavut issues a total of 518 tags yearly for both subsistence and sport hunts, although not all the tags are used. The territorial government is seeking to reduce some of those quotas, although Inuit hunters are resisting those moves. The latest data suggests eight of the world's 19 subpopulations of bears are decreasing, three are stable and one is increasing. Not enough is known about the other seven to assign a trend. Nirlungyak points out that trade in no other species has been banned under the convention on the basis of forecasts. "There's no justification. There's no need when you look at the science. It's a political move. "We want the Canadian government to defend us and oppose this listing." An Environment Canada spokeswoman said in an email that Canada does not support the U.S. request to change the polar bear's status. She said Canadian representatives would lobby other countries to reject the proposal, which requires a two-thirds majority to pass. The American proposal even surprised some environmentalists. "Our initial analysis indicated that hunting was not the primary threat," said Geoff York, the World Wildlife Fund's director of polar bear conservation. "We were not expecting any country to advocate a proposal for polar bears on this." York said any new protection for polar bears must have the support of the people who live with them. "We have concerns about the impact ... on northern people," he said. "The people on the ground have to be involved with the solution." However, Andrew Wetzler of the Natural Resources Defence Council, which lobbied for the proposal, said that any extra stress on bear populations should be eliminated as they struggle to adapt to their new climate. "As populations start to decline, it becomes much more important to keep other factors affecting (them) to a minimum," said Wetzler. "We think that trophy hunting is inappropriate." This year's summer sea ice reached its third-lowest level in 30 years of record-keeping. Wetzler said the Canadian government should provide transition funding to Inuit communities to wean them off the hunting industry. If you have that much to fight for, then you should be fighting. The sentiment that modern day ordinary Canadians do not need firearms for protection is pleasant but unrealistic. To discourage responsible deserving Canadians from possessing firearms for lawful self-defence and other legitimate purposes is to risk sacrificing them at the altar of political correctness." - Alberta Provincial Court Judge Demetrick | ||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia