Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
One of Us |
Skyline, you typically present a fairly reasonable point of view on here but you seem to have lost it on this one. For the last time, I have no interest in killing all bears, just one that took the life of a human in a highly utilized area of Alberta. Your premise that all bears are one step away from being a man killer is total BS. Very few bears will ever cross that line but those that do need to be destroyed. This isn't about being afraid of bears or being a pussy....it's about dealing with one individual bear that crossed the line. I really enjoy being around the big bears and have no ill will toward them but I'm not buying into the Disnification of them either. This one bear killed a human and she resides in an area of very high human traffic....I see no reason she should continue to live there. Let's stop the kill all bears BS and the I'm a more more manly man than you bravado because this discussion has never been about that and discuss this one bear that is a proven man killer. Why are we trying to save her? And why are we leaving her in an area where she will have close contact with hundreds of children each year. We know how they deal with man killers in the NWT and we know how they deal with man killers in Africa. Why is this bear sacred? This isn't some remote region of the arctic here....is a very popular summer hiking trail filled with innocent children. Seeing this bear killed would give me no pleasure...it's a simple matter of practicality. | |||
|
One of Us |
Grizzlies react to situations. Given the right set of circumstances (or perhaps we should say wrong) they will take a round out of you. Grizzlies on a kill, cubs, etc. If the situation is such that the person(s) and bear stumble into a specific set of circumstances they are going to react. There will always be grizzly attacks if you stick a lot of people in grizzly country or you are involved in killing game in grizzly country. That is the nature of the beast and it is something we have to take into consideration when we chose to work or recreate in their environment. If a grizzly attack is predatory in nature and not defensive that is one thing………. and that is rare with grizzlies……….. predatory behaviour certainly means the bear needs to be removed. But reactionary defensive attacks by bears that have not been in trouble before…… well I just do not believe the always have to be killed. We allow predators or our own species to get off with light sentences and then release them back into society to do it again………. and we know they will repeat the offences…….. but we should just kill a sow and her cubs because she reacted the way she did. And her behaviour is far from surprising, it is behaviour in a situation we all know could be dangerous. It has nothing to do with bravado or manliness…… that is certainly BS……. it has to do with taking responsibility for your actions and choices. If you chose to spend time in good grizzly country there is a chance you could get mauled if you inadvertently get yourself into a situation that triggers it. Please spare me the innocent children crap……. that does not wash with me and it is the typical line used by Liberal minded people to impose restrictions on all of us that are not required and are typically feel good. Killing the sow and her cubs is just that, feel good euthanasia. That sow and her cubs will most likely not ever find themselves in that situation again, as it is unlikely that another hominid will accidentally blunder into a kill and cubs situation with this bear again. Killing them is feel good euthanasia. Makes the people who are afraid of bear attacks and those who think that people are so much more deserving of life than anything else on the planet, feel safer……….. but is most likely needless. You have your views on this and I have mine. They are obviously not the same. Nothing you say is going to change my opinion on this as I have hunted and guided for grizzlies for many years and it is my opinion. Opinions are not worth a pinch of you know what. So I will leave it at that and I am not going to make any further comment on this thread. Cheers! ______________________________________________ The power of accurate observation is frequently called cynicism by those who are bereft of that gift. | |||
|
One of Us |
Skyline I respect your experience and your opinion but you've kept dodging the one question here....why save this one proven man killer? There are lots of other discussions to be had regarding the threat from bears and who has bigger testicles but I'm honestly interested in discussing this one single bear that killed a human with you....As for your comment about Liberals, I think you'll find yourself firmly entrenched in their camp on this issue. They are the ones screaming to save this man killer. The vast majority of serious mountain hunters I've talked to on this issue are all for putting a bullet in this man killer. If I had to guess, they vote conservative too. Do you feel the same every time a man-killing leopard or lion or croc strikes in Africa? What about that grizz in the NWT that recently killed the hunter? | |||
|
One of Us |
I've encountered many grizzly sows with cubs....many at close range and several unexpected. I've encountered several bears on kills, including sows with cubs twice....I'm still alive and I'm not more bush savvy than Mr. Cross was. I don't buy into the argument that this is natural behavior for bears. If it was there would be hundreds of human deaths by grizzly bears each year. I think this was one bear that acted inappropriately and I can't understand why some people are so willing to give her a pass. That's my logic. Human deaths by grizzlies are extremely rare especially when you take into account the extreme overlap in areas like where this event occurred. This is not natural behaviour! I'd be dead if it was and so would hundreds of others. And what the heck was she "defending" her cub and food from. Did Mr. Cross pose some threat? That whole defense argument is a red herring...there was nothing to defend from. | |||
|
One of Us |
Seems to be a disturbing trend. This is the 3rd hunter in Alberta to be killed by a Grizzly over the past 7 years. Hunters may be hesitant to fire upon an aggressive Grizzly before it's too late because of the consequences of killing a protected species even in self-defence? Grizzly hunting in Alberta has been suspended since 2006 - November 2007: http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/...led-by-bear-1.658839 October 2008: http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/...hunter-shot-1.701971 | |||
|
One of Us |
Definitely some truth in that. They charged a father a few years ago for shooting a bear that was trying to kill his kid...he beat the charges but it shows their mindset. | |||
|
One of Us |
Do you no more of what went on with this latest grizzly encounter then what has been posted in the media? | |||
|
One of Us |
The deterrent is considerable. The maximum penalty for killing a Grizzly in Alberta is a $100,000 fine and 2 years of imprisonment - http://www.westerncanadiangame...S2013MicroScope.html http://www.solgps.alberta.ca/n...grizzlypoachers.aspx | |||
|
One of Us |
No, no one knows what actually went down other than that Mr Cross, an experienced mountain hunter, was killed. I did video this bear two days before she killed Mr Cross. There but for the grace of God go I! | |||
|
One of Us |
killing a grizzly especially a sow is not an easy decision, TJ you should remember what happened in Banff where they shot the wrong sow and cub (thanks for the DNA) so death penalty is just a band aid plaster. you mentionned TJ that you videoed her and she didnt attack you so something happened that trigger that attack and nobody can say what make that attack. as far the info i have she didnt fed on him like in the NWT killing. | |||
|
One of Us |
They knew exactly which bear it was in this case. | |||
|
one of us |
Been communicating with a guy who got an archery moose on the Ya Ha Tinda. Had to argue with a sow Grizzly and two cubs for the second half of it. She was most reluctant to back off, even after a warning shot. Grizz Indeed, no human being has yet lived under conditions which, considering the prevailing climates of the past, can be regarded as normal. John E Pfeiffer, The Emergence of Man Those who can't skin, can hold a leg. Abraham Lincoln Only one war at a time. Abe Again. | |||
|
One of Us |
Familiar with that area as well. Surprised the sow let him have it! Grizzlies can be called in with elk or moose calls. Beware. | |||
|
One of Us |
"When there is a predatory attack that results in a (human) killing, policy is that bear is euthanized," said Duncan MacDonnell, spokesman for Sustainable Resource Development. "Once a bear considers humans as fair prey, that's a very dangerous situation." This is a quote from a Calgary Herald article in Oct 2008 when a grizzly sow with cubs killed a man near Sundre AB. Somewhere along the line policy must have changed. | |||
|
One of Us |
One of the Government's qualifications for a predatory attack is that flesh must be consumed. I don't believe it was in Mr. Cross' case. | |||
|
One of Us |
Well said Hunting isn't a mater of life and death......it's more important than that | |||
|
One of Us |
And six weeks later the area is still closed to protect hunters from a bear that poses no danger..... | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 2 |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia