The Accurate Reloading Forums
George Hoenig DR
23 March 2013, 21:05
fla3006George Hoenig DR
I borrowed this from the Custom Rifle forum, amazing:
GeorgeHoenigDR
NRA Life Member, Band of Bubbas Charter Member, PGCA, DRSS.
Shoot & hunt with vintage classics.
23 March 2013, 22:42
labdadWow!
24 March 2013, 01:36
surestrikeThose are super cool and super unique. But from a utility standpoint they look like they'd take a week to reload? I don't know that for sure has anybody ever played with one?
24 March 2013, 12:38
McKayyes many of us have played with them. Cool but I think a novelty. Great fit and finsh. Yes I believe they would be quite slow to reload.
Mac
25 March 2013, 00:17
BaxterBI would argue against the idea of the Rotary rifle as pure novelty. It wasn't designed just to be different, it is the result of a master gunbuilder's thoughts on rifle building and what works, what does not, and how to make a double with as few weaknesses (technically speaking) possible. And this based on many, many years of working on and building guns of all sorts. The reloading part is what most people get hung up on and I can see that, but if reloading were the only factor in building a rifle, they'd all be auto-loaders, bolt etc. And consider that most of these rifles have been built as 9.3x74 down to .17 HMR (although he now does offer a 450 NE), so the application of the rifle in the field doesn't necessarily hinge on quick reloading in the face of a charge as a sole point of performance.
25 March 2013, 20:28
MacD37.......................................................................

....Mac >>>===(x)===> MacD37, ...and DUGABOY1
DRSS Charter member
"If I die today, I've had a life well spent, for I've been to see the Elephant, and smelled the smoke of Africa!"~ME 1982
Hands of Old Elmer Keith
25 March 2013, 22:57
Cross LViolated the hell out of the K.I.S.S. principal
25 March 2013, 23:19
subsailor74quote:
Originally posted by MacD37:
.......................................................................
Don't sugar coat it Mac.....tell us how you really feel!
26 March 2013, 00:13
McKayquote:
Originally posted by MacD37:
.......................................................................
Wow....overly sensitive? I would love to own one, just not at that price. I just don't think they are that practical. Really cool though. I did not say that I think they are not worth the price for the work that is put in them. I stand by my comment. I think there is a lot better choices out there that will function quicker in the field.
Mac
30 March 2013, 09:20
NakihunterI really like that. Not the classic traditional look but still better than an O/U.
If one can load a CZ magnum bolt rifle from the shoulder then one can reload any gun quickly. JMHO
"When the wind stops....start rowing. When the wind starts, get the sail up quick."
30 March 2013, 11:03
BaxterBquote:
I really like that. Not the classic traditional look but still better than an O/U
It is an O/U , just loads as a SxS
30 March 2013, 17:50
D R HunterCool design and I'd have one in a collection if money was not an issue.
I have to say I think B. Bradshaw's D/R is the best action choice.
D/R Hunter
Correct bullet placement, combined with the required depth of bullet penetration, results in an anchored animal...
05 April 2013, 00:37
Use Enough GunI would have no interest in one.

I'm too much of a traditionalist when it comes to my double rifles!

05 April 2013, 02:23
richjscope mount is an abortion
05 April 2013, 08:46
Idaho SharpshooterThis would make a better conversation if ONE of you actually owned one of George's rifles and had hunted with it.
Or, had the technical background to be able to discuss the design intelligently.
Sadly, George's customers, and he is back ordered significantly; do not seem to have your grasp of the design issues and/or deficiencies.
06 April 2013, 02:13
BaxterBquote:
scope mount is an abortion
Good grief.
HEre is a video of George from SCI this year.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_dGD0lgZuPs06 April 2013, 02:31
Todd WilliamsWatching him open and close the action doesn't look that cumbersome after all. I think I'll stand corrected on my previous statements to field functionality.
06 April 2013, 02:44
McKayquote:
Originally posted by Idaho Sharpshooter:
This would make a better conversation if ONE of you actually owned one of George's rifles and had hunted with it.
Or, had the technical background to be able to discuss the design intelligently.
Sadly, George's customers, and he is back ordered significantly; do not seem to have your grasp of the design issues and/or deficiencies.
So do you enjoy yours?
Mac
06 April 2013, 20:19
mdstewartI have never had the pleasure of handling one of George's rifles, but I've always admired their beauty and original design. I'd like to play with one, shoot it a few times, and then make judgement on whether I think it would be comfortable for me to operate and whether I like the strength of the action. It sure looks strong as it gets.
JP Sauer Drilling 12x12x9.3x72
David Murray Scottish Hammer 12 Bore
Alex Henry 500/450 Double Rifle
Steyr Classic Mannlicher Fullstock 6.5x55
Steyr Classic Mannlicher Fullstock .30-06
Walther PPQ H2 9mm
Walther PPS M2
Cogswell & Harrison Hammer 12 Bore Damascus
And Too Many More
12 April 2013, 07:49
StormsGSPI've handled, but not shot one, and I thought it was superb.
-----------------------------------------
"I went to the woods because I wished to live deliberately, to front only the essential facts of life, and see if I could not learn what it had to teach, and not, when I came to die, discover that I had not lived. -Henry David Thoreau, Walden