Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
One of Us |
I'm glad my stupid question caused the professor (MacD37) to come out of his shell. I learned a lot, as I suppose most of you did. Thanks, Mac. | |||
|
One of Us |
Mac stated it about as well as can be said. Just one more point of clarification however and that is that the actual velocity of the load is not what had to be modified in my "scope load" but rather I had to find a combination of powder speed / bullet weight and design, i.e. acceleration rate up to that design velocity, that caused my bullet to remain in the barrel for the necessary time to exit at the appropriate point in the recoil arc. In other words, as Mac described, adding the scope added weight which slowed the recoil arc, so I had to find a bullet / powder combination that accelerated to design velocity at a slower rate allowing the bullet to remain in the barrel longer. I used this analogy a few times in the past but I'll do so again now. Think of two drag race cars racing each other. They may both cross the finish line at the same exact speed but one may get there quicker than the other does. That's a difference in accelerate rate. | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 2 |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia