THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM DOUBLE RIFLES FORUM

Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Here's another one!
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
Picture of 470Evans
posted
Sure wish Greener hadn't used that side safety! Looks to be in good shape.

http://www.collectorsfirearms.com/admin/product_details.php?itemID=18296
 
Posts: 1311 | Location: Texas | Registered: 29 August 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of MJines
posted Hide Post
Nice looking rifle and package.


Mike
 
Posts: 21719 | Registered: 03 January 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Hog Killer
posted Hide Post
Kind of looks like it has been refinished. Case colors are mighty strong for a 83 year old DR. Grip area checkering is a good bit darker than the rest of the wood finish.

Still it is a nice looking piece.

Keith


IGNORE YOUR RIGHTS AND THEY'LL GO AWAY!!!
------------------------------------
We Band of Bubbas & STC Hunting Club, The Whomper Club
 
Posts: 4553 | Location: Walker Co.,Texas | Registered: 05 September 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of jimatcat
posted Hide Post
glad that i'm in houstom for the week....


go big or go home ........

DSC-- Life Member
NRA--Life member
DRSS--9.3x74 r Chapuis
 
Posts: 2842 | Location: dividing my time between san angelo and victoria texas.......... USA | Registered: 26 July 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Hog Killer:
Kind of looks like it has been refinished. Case colors are mighty strong for a 83 year old DR. Grip area checkering is a good bit darker than the rest of the wood finish.

Still it is a nice looking piece.

Keith



Keith

I've got or had 3 DR's with more colour on them than that and they weren't refinished.

IMHO, you can't just assume it's been redone because of it's age - it has to be looked at as part of a whole package and whether the barrels et all have been redone, whether the gun has worn bores but the action is like new etc etc.
 
Posts: 3191 | Location: Victoria, Australia | Registered: 01 March 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of ozhunter
posted Hide Post
Is the side safety a problem?
It looks like it would work just fine and certainly better than the Kreighoff type used in a hurry.
 
Posts: 5886 | Location: Sydney,Australia  | Registered: 03 July 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Side Saftey's are fine and very easy to use.

Even if more used to the top safety,
the Greener is very quick to learn
even if not used before.
 
Posts: 3191 | Location: Victoria, Australia | Registered: 01 March 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
goodness, i'm surprised anyone is interested !

didn't they notice it is the 3 1/4" case ???

everybody is goo gaw about the hornaday 3" version 450/400


TOMO577
DOUBLE RIFLE SHOOTERS SOCIETY
 
Posts: 1144 | Location: west of erie, pa | Registered: 15 September 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by tomo577:
goodness, i'm surprised anyone is interested !

didn't they notice it is the 3 1/4" case ???

everybody is goo gaw about the hornaday 3" version 450/400



So what if it's the 3 1/4" case ?

It's still does it's job and IMHO, most DR shooters
reload anyway so it's not that much of an issue IMHO.

Nice gun for a Greener.
 
Posts: 3191 | Location: Victoria, Australia | Registered: 01 March 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I saw it today. Weighs 11 lbs, 15 oz without scope. Roll Eyes Completely redone by a 'Murrican'. Excellent bores and nice curb appeal, but when you look close...I hate it when that happens.
------------------------------------------------
"Serious rifles have two barrels, everything else just burns gunpowder."
 
Posts: 1742 | Location: Texas | Registered: 10 January 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Eeker 11 pounds 15 oz!!! That's 500 Nitro Express weight!!!!! shocker



Jack

OH GOD! {Seriously, we need the help.}

 
Posts: 2791 | Location: USA - East Coast | Registered: 10 December 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
jack-

maybe it's the MAGNUM model ?

that extra 1/4" of powder capacity takes it out of the league of the old jeffery model 3".

maybe hornaday will start loading this too ?

and ruger chambering for it.

wouldn't a ruger 77 chambered for this be a bust !

sure put those 303 enfields with rimmed cases to shame.


TOMO577
DOUBLE RIFLE SHOOTERS SOCIETY
 
Posts: 1144 | Location: west of erie, pa | Registered: 15 September 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by tomo577:
maybe it's the MAGNUM model ?

that extra 1/4" of powder capacity takes it out of the league of the old jeffery model 3".


No. The 3" case is larger than the 3 1/4". That's why is produces a half ton less pressure with the same load.
-----------------------------------------------
"Serious rifles have two barrels, everything else just burns gunpowder."
 
Posts: 1742 | Location: Texas | Registered: 10 January 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally by Mark C. - "No. The 3" case is larger than the 3 1/4".

That's why it produces a half ton less pressure with the same load."


The 3 inch has the shoulder further forward making more available space for

gun powder in the drawings that I've seen. A "side effect" is a shorter neck.



Jack

OH GOD! {Seriously, we need the help.}

 
Posts: 2791 | Location: USA - East Coast | Registered: 10 December 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by tomo577:
jack-

maybe it's the MAGNUM model ?

that extra 1/4" of powder capacity takes it out of the league of the old jeffery model 3".

maybe...


Tom, "Ah'm "SHER, yer jes' funnin"!



Jack

OH GOD! {Seriously, we need the help.}

 
Posts: 2791 | Location: USA - East Coast | Registered: 10 December 2005Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia